• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会经济地位高低不同的老年人群体食物选择的影响因素:一项离散选择实验

Factors affecting food choices of older adults from high and low socioeconomic groups: a discrete choice experiment.

作者信息

Kamphuis Carlijn B M, de Bekker-Grob Esther W, van Lenthe Frank J

机构信息

From the Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Am J Clin Nutr. 2015 Apr;101(4):768-74. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.114.096776. Epub 2015 Jan 28.

DOI:10.3945/ajcn.114.096776
PMID:25833974
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Healthiness, price, and convenience are typically indicated as important motives for food choices; however, it is largely unknown to what extent older adults from high and low socioeconomic groups differ in these underlying motives. A discrete choice experiment (DCE) is an innovative way to elicit implicit motives for food choices.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to investigate differences in food motives between socioeconomic groups by means of a DCE.

DESIGN

A DCE was carried out during a face-to-face interview among older adults as part of the Health and Living Conditions in Eindhoven and surrounding cities (GLOBE) cohort study, The Netherlands. Participants (n = 399; mean age: 63.3 y) were offered a series of choice sets about a usual dinner at home and were asked to choose in each choice set between 2 meals and an opt-out choice, with different combinations of attribute levels. We included 5 meal attributes (taste, healthiness, preparation time, travel time to shops, and price) and 3 or 4 levels for each attribute. Data were analyzed by multinomial logit models.

RESULTS

Healthiness, taste, price, and travel time to the grocery store proved to significantly influence older adults' meal decisions; preparation time was not significant. Healthiness was the most important attribute for all of the participants. More highly educated participants rated a healthy and less expensive meal to be more important than did less educated participants. Those with a high income rated a meal that was healthy and very tasteful to be more important than did those with a lower income.

CONCLUSIONS

Healthiness, taste, price, and travel time to grocery shops influenced older adults' meal decisions. Higher socioeconomic groups valued health more than did lower socioeconomic groups. DCEs represent a promising method to gain insight into the relative importance of motives for food choices. This trial was registered at www.isrctn.com as ISRCTN60293770.

摘要

背景

健康、价格和便利性通常被认为是食物选择的重要动机;然而,社会经济地位高低不同的老年人在这些潜在动机方面的差异程度在很大程度上尚不清楚。离散选择实验(DCE)是一种引出食物选择隐含动机的创新方法。

目的

旨在通过离散选择实验研究社会经济群体之间在食物动机上的差异。

设计

作为荷兰埃因霍温及周边城市健康与生活状况(GLOBE)队列研究的一部分,在对老年人进行面对面访谈期间开展了离散选择实验。参与者(n = 399;平均年龄:63.3岁)被提供了一系列关于在家中常吃晚餐的选择集,并被要求在每个选择集中在两餐和一个退出选择之间进行选择,各属性水平有不同组合。我们纳入了5个餐食属性(口味、健康程度、准备时间、去商店的行程时间和价格),每个属性有3或4个水平。数据通过多项逻辑回归模型进行分析。

结果

健康程度、口味、价格和去杂货店的行程时间被证明对老年人的餐食决策有显著影响;准备时间不显著。健康程度是所有参与者最重要的属性。受教育程度较高的参与者比受教育程度较低的参与者更看重健康且价格较低的餐食。高收入者比低收入者更看重健康且非常美味的餐食。

结论

健康程度、口味、价格和去杂货店的行程时间影响了老年人的餐食决策。社会经济地位较高的群体比社会经济地位较低的群体更重视健康。离散选择实验是一种很有前景的方法,可用于深入了解食物选择动机的相对重要性。该试验在www.isrctn.com上注册,注册号为ISRCTN60293770。

相似文献

1
Factors affecting food choices of older adults from high and low socioeconomic groups: a discrete choice experiment.社会经济地位高低不同的老年人群体食物选择的影响因素:一项离散选择实验
Am J Clin Nutr. 2015 Apr;101(4):768-74. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.114.096776. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
2
Ranking of meal preferences and interactions with demographic characteristics: a discrete choice experiment in young adults.饮食偏好排序及与人口特征的相互关系:一项针对青年成年人的离散选择实验。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Dec 1;17(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-01059-7.
3
Understanding Meal Choices in Young Adults and Interactions with Demographics, Diet Quality, and Health Behaviors: A Discrete Choice Experiment.了解年轻人的膳食选择及其与人口统计学、饮食质量和健康行为的相互作用:一项离散选择实验。
J Nutr. 2021 Aug 7;151(8):2361-2371. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxab106.
4
Assessment of the influence of food attributes on meal choice selection by socioeconomic status and race/ethnicity among women living in Chicago, USA: A discrete choice experiment.评估食物属性对美国芝加哥女性膳食选择的影响:基于离散选择实验的社会经济地位和种族/民族差异分析。
Appetite. 2019 Aug 1;139:19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.04.003. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
5
Personal values, motives, and healthy and sustainable food choices: Examining differences between home meals and restaurant meals.个人价值观、动机与健康可持续食物选择:比较家庭餐与餐馆餐的差异。
Appetite. 2023 Mar 1;182:106432. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2022.106432. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
6
Organic food consumption in Poland: Motives and barriers.波兰的有机食品消费:动机和障碍。
Appetite. 2016 Oct 1;105:737-46. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.07.012. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
7
Motives for dish choices during home meal preparation: results from a large sample of the NutriNet-Santé study.家庭用餐准备过程中菜肴选择的动机:来自NutriNet-Santé研究的大量样本结果
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 Sep 30;12:120. doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0270-9.
8
Association between Motives for Dish Choices during Home Meal Preparation and Weight Status in the NutriNet-Santé Study.NutriNet-Santé研究中家庭用餐准备期间菜肴选择动机与体重状况之间的关联
Nutrients. 2016 Jul 5;8(7):413. doi: 10.3390/nu8070413.
9
Food choice motives including sustainability during purchasing are associated with a healthy dietary pattern in French adults.在法国成年人中,购买食品时的选择动机(包括可持续性)与健康的饮食模式有关。
Nutr J. 2017 Sep 18;16(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12937-017-0279-9.
10
Food choice motives among two disparate socioeconomic groups in Brazil.巴西两个截然不同社会经济群体的食物选择动机。
Appetite. 2020 Dec 1;155:104790. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.104790. Epub 2020 Jul 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Educational Attainment as a Super Determinant of Diet Quality and Dietary Inequities.教育程度作为饮食质量和饮食不平等的超级决定因素。
Adv Nutr. 2025 Jul 17;16(9):100482. doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2025.100482.
2
Adherence to the planetary health diet reduces dietary costs by 21% supporting affordable healthy eating among older adults in Iran.坚持行星健康饮食可使饮食成本降低21%,有助于伊朗老年人实现可负担得起的健康饮食。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 20;15(1):9586. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-93835-3.
3
Association between socioeconomic status and the triglyceride glucose index: a cross-sectional study based on NHANES 2007-2016.
社会经济地位与甘油三酯葡萄糖指数之间的关联:一项基于2007 - 2016年美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)的横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 10;25(1):934. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22085-9.
4
Task Shifting, eHealth and Shared Decision-Making-Preference Heterogeneity in the Adult Population for Developments in Outpatient Primary Healthcare.任务转移、电子健康与共同决策——成年人群对门诊初级医疗保健发展的偏好异质性
Health Expect. 2025 Feb;28(1):e70060. doi: 10.1111/hex.70060.
5
COVID and consumers' food strategies in Madrid, Spain: Towards a resilient city-region food system approach.西班牙马德里的新冠疫情与消费者的食品策略:迈向具有韧性的城市区域食品系统方法
Heliyon. 2024 Nov 20;10(23):e40565. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40565. eCollection 2024 Dec 15.
6
Nutrition and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.老年人的营养与口腔健康相关生活质量:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Evid Based Dent. 2025 Jun;26(2):109. doi: 10.1038/s41432-024-01088-2. Epub 2024 Nov 27.
7
Time-varying exposure to food retailers and cardiovascular disease hospitalization and mortality in the netherlands: a nationwide prospective cohort study.荷兰:时间变化的食物零售商暴露与心血管疾病住院和死亡的关系:一项全国性前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Med. 2024 Oct 8;22(1):427. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03648-w.
8
Sustainability and cost of typical and heart-healthy dietary patterns in Australia.澳大利亚典型饮食模式与心脏健康饮食模式的可持续性及成本
Am Heart J Plus. 2024 Aug 23;45:100448. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2024.100448. eCollection 2024 Sep.
9
Farmers' Willingness to Participate in a Carbon Sequestration Program - A Discrete Choice Experiment.农民参与碳封存计划的意愿——离散选择实验。
Environ Manage. 2024 Aug;74(2):332-349. doi: 10.1007/s00267-024-01963-9. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
10
Drivers of consumer food choices of multinational corporations' products over local foods in Ghana: a maximum difference scaling study.跨国公司产品相对于加纳本地食品,消费者选择其作为食物的驱动因素:最大差异标度研究。
Global Health. 2024 Mar 19;20(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12992-024-01027-x.