Cobben Rachel E, Collins Clare E, Charlton Karen E, Bucher Tamara, Stanford Jordan
School of Health Sciences, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.
Food and Nutrition Research Program, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305, Australia.
Am Heart J Plus. 2024 Aug 23;45:100448. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2024.100448. eCollection 2024 Sep.
The aim was to quantify and compare the environmental and financial impact of two diets: a heart-healthy Australian diet (HAD) and the typical Australian diet (TAD).
The study involved a secondary analysis of two modelled dietary patterns used in a cross-over feeding trial.
The evaluation focused on two-week (7-day cyclic) meal plans designed to meet the nutritional requirements for a reference 71-year-old male (9000 kJ) for each dietary pattern.
The environmental footprint of each dietary pattern was calculated using the Global Warming Potential (GWP*) metric, taking into account single foods, multi-ingredient foods, and mixed dishes. Prices were obtained from a large Australian supermarket.
The HAD produced 23.8 % less CO equivalents (COe) per day (2.16 kg COe) compared to the TAD (2.83 kg COe per day). Meat and discretionary foods were the primary contributors to the environmental footprint of the TAD, whereas dairy and vegetables constituted the largest contributors to the HAD footprint. However, the HAD was 51 % more expensive than the TAD.
Transitioning from a TAD to a HAD could significantly reduce CO emissions and with benefits for human health and the environment. Affordability will be a major barrier. Strategies to reduce costs of convenient healthy food are needed. Future studies should expand the GWP* database and consider additional environmental dimensions to comprehensively assess the impact of dietary patterns. Current findings have implications for menu planning within feeding trials and for individuals seeking to reduce their carbon footprint while adhering to heart-healthy eating guidelines.
本研究旨在量化并比较两种饮食方式对环境和经济的影响,这两种饮食方式分别为:有益心脏健康的澳大利亚饮食(HAD)和典型的澳大利亚饮食(TAD)。
本研究对交叉喂养试验中使用的两种模拟饮食模式进行了二次分析。
评估聚焦于为期两周(7天循环)的饮食计划模式,该模式旨在满足一名71岁参考男性(9000千焦)对每种饮食模式的营养需求。
每种饮食模式的环境足迹通过全球变暖潜能值(GWP*)指标进行计算,同时考虑单一食物、多成分食物和混合菜肴。价格取自一家大型澳大利亚超市。
与TAD(每天2.83千克二氧化碳当量)相比,HAD每天产生的二氧化碳当量(COe)少23.8%(2.16千克COe)。肉类和随意性食物是TAD环境足迹的主要贡献者,而乳制品和蔬菜是HAD足迹的最大贡献者。然而,HAD的价格比TAD贵51%。
从TAD转变为HAD可显著减少碳排放,并对人类健康和环境有益。可承受性将是一个主要障碍。需要制定降低健康方便食品成本的策略。未来的研究应扩展GWP*数据库,并考虑其他环境维度,以全面评估饮食模式的影响。目前的研究结果对喂养试验中的菜单规划以及寻求在遵循有益心脏健康的饮食指南的同时减少碳足迹的个人具有启示意义。