Suppr超能文献

风湿病患者对临床试验的认知:来自一家单一风湿病三级中心的经验

Clinical trials perception in rheumatology patients: experience from a single rheumatology tertiary center.

作者信息

Ciurtin Coziana, Leandro Maria, Fitz-Clarence Halina, Nguyen Hanh, Walsh Stephen B, Isenberg David A

机构信息

From the Department of Rheumatology, University College London Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust; Centre for Nephrology, University College London, London, UK.C. Ciurtin, PhD, Consultant Rheumatologist; M. Leandro, PhD, Consultant Rheumatologist; H. Fitz-Clarence, PhD, Consultant Rheumatologist; H. Nguyen, MSc, Rheumatology Researcher; D.A. Isenberg, MD, Academic Director, Centre for Rheumatology Research, Department of Rheumatology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; S.B. Walsh, PhD, Senior Lecturer in Experimental Medicine and Honorary Consultant Nephrologist, Centre for Nephrology, University College London.

出版信息

J Rheumatol. 2015 Jun;42(6):988-93. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.141091. Epub 2015 Apr 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the perception and willingness of rheumatology patients to participate in clinical trials. No previous similar studies are available.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional survey of rheumatology patients using a questionnaire, which comprised 2 demographic questions, two 5-point Likert opinion questions, 19 true/false/unsure knowledge questions, and 1 open question addressing what would help the participant to gain a better understanding about clinical trials.

RESULTS

Eighty-five patients returned the questionnaires (response rate 84.1%). The mean number of correct answers to the 19 knowledge questions was 10.5 ± 2.87. Patients with higher versus lower levels of education had significantly higher knowledge scores (mean correct answers 59.4 ± 13.1 vs 39.8 ± 20.4, p = 0.013). They also expressed greater willingness to take part in research (87.5% vs 48.2%, p < 0.001). The patients who agreed to participate in research provided significantly more correct answers (59.4 ± 15.3% vs 47.7 ± 27.2%, p = 0.032). Poor disease control as the main reason to join a clinical trial correlated well with patients' previous participation in research (r = 0.71; p < 0.05) and the lack of understanding of research principles (defined as less than 50% correct answers to the knowledge questions) correlated with the lack of willingness to participate in clinical trials (r = 0.72; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The results of our study revealed that patients lack information about clinical trials (the correct response rate was only slightly above 50%), and that they had a moderate willingness to take part in clinical trials. The need for educational programs about clinical research was highlighted by the participants to the survey.

摘要

目的

调查风湿病患者对参与临床试验的认知和意愿。此前尚无类似研究。

方法

我们使用问卷对风湿病患者进行了横断面调查,问卷包括2个人口统计学问题、两个5级李克特意见问题、19个是非/不确定知识问题以及1个开放式问题,该开放式问题询问什么有助于参与者更好地了解临床试验。

结果

85名患者返还了问卷(回复率84.1%)。19个知识问题的平均正确答案数为10.5±2.87。教育水平较高与较低的患者知识得分显著更高(平均正确答案数59.4±13.1对39.8±20.4,p = 0.013)。他们也表现出更强的参与研究意愿(87.5%对48.2%,p < 0.001)。同意参与研究的患者提供的正确答案显著更多(59.4±15.3%对47.7±27.2%,p = 0.032)。将疾病控制不佳作为参加临床试验的主要原因与患者此前参与研究情况密切相关(r = 0.71;p < 0.05),而对研究原则缺乏理解(定义为知识问题正确答案少于50%)与缺乏参与临床试验的意愿相关(r = 0.72;p < 0.05)。

结论

我们的研究结果显示,患者缺乏关于临床试验的信息(正确回复率仅略高于50%),并且他们参与临床试验的意愿中等。调查参与者强调了开展临床研究教育项目的必要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验