• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

罗马尼亚一家三级心脏病学中心患者对参与基于生物标志物的临床试验的态度——调查方法

The Attitude of Patients from a Romanian Tertiary Cardiology Center as Regards Participation in Biomarker-Based Clinical Trials - Survey Methodology.

作者信息

Mihaela Micheu Miruna, Udrea Oana-Maria, Octavia Popa Mihaela, Rusu Iulia, Gheorghe-Fronea Oana, Scafa-Udriste Alexandru, Dorobantu Maria

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Clinical Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.

Department of Psychology, "Grigore Alexandrescu" Clinical Hospital of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.

出版信息

J Med Life. 2018 Oct-Dec;11(4):320-327. doi: 10.25122/jml-2018-0072.

DOI:10.25122/jml-2018-0072
PMID:30894889
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6418342/
Abstract

One of the challenges faced when conducting a clinical trial is the recruitment of the proposed number of participants. Accordingly, identifying barriers to patients' enrollment and developing effective strategies to overcome them is mandatory. One of the main strategies employed to improve participation rate consists of designing the informed consent forms based on patients' feedback. This survey aims to explore the attitude of patients admitted in a Romanian tertiary cardiology center to take part in biomarker-based clinical trials. This is a descriptive, prospective and longitudinal single-center study. Participants will be recruited until the planned sample size will be reached (n=333). The patients will be interviewed based on a semi-structured questionnaire which includes four sections: demographics (7 items), personal medical history (7 items), attitudes (9 items) and trust (4 items). Descriptive statistics will be used to illustrate patients' demographics, medical history, attitudes toward biomarker-based clinical trials and trust in medical researchers. Logistic regression models will be employed to assess relations between patients' attitudes, trust, and different socio-demographic variables. Data analysis will offer answers to key questions addressed by this survey: What amount of and in what form should information be disclosed? Who should make the invitation to participate? The information gained will facilitate tailoring informed consent forms to suit the needs of patients with various demographic, social and educational backgrounds.

摘要

开展临床试验时面临的挑战之一是招募到计划数量的参与者。因此,识别患者入组的障碍并制定有效的克服策略是必不可少的。提高参与率的主要策略之一是根据患者反馈设计知情同意书。本调查旨在探讨罗马尼亚一家三级心脏病中心收治的患者参与基于生物标志物的临床试验的态度。这是一项描述性、前瞻性和纵向的单中心研究。将持续招募参与者,直至达到计划样本量(n = 333)。将根据一份半结构化问卷对患者进行访谈,该问卷包括四个部分:人口统计学(7项)、个人病史(7项)、态度(9项)和信任(4项)。描述性统计将用于说明患者的人口统计学特征、病史、对基于生物标志物的临床试验的态度以及对医学研究人员的信任。将采用逻辑回归模型评估患者的态度、信任与不同社会人口学变量之间的关系。数据分析将为本次调查提出的关键问题提供答案:应披露多少信息以及以何种形式披露?应由谁发出参与邀请?所获得的信息将有助于量身定制知情同意书,以满足不同人口统计学、社会和教育背景患者的需求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc38/6418342/cc89bc8303ed/JMedLife-11-320-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc38/6418342/cc89bc8303ed/JMedLife-11-320-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc38/6418342/cc89bc8303ed/JMedLife-11-320-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The Attitude of Patients from a Romanian Tertiary Cardiology Center as Regards Participation in Biomarker-Based Clinical Trials - Survey Methodology.罗马尼亚一家三级心脏病学中心患者对参与基于生物标志物的临床试验的态度——调查方法
J Med Life. 2018 Oct-Dec;11(4):320-327. doi: 10.25122/jml-2018-0072.
2
The Attitude of Patients from a Romanian Tertiary Cardiology Center Regarding Participation in Biomarker-Based Clinical Trials.罗马尼亚一家三级心脏病学中心患者对参与基于生物标志物的临床试验的态度。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Oct 31;57(11):1180. doi: 10.3390/medicina57111180.
3
Determinants of informed consent in a cataract surgery clinical trial: why patients participate.白内障手术临床试验中知情同意的决定因素:患者为何参与。
Can J Ophthalmol. 2012 Apr;47(2):118-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2012.01.006.
4
Levels of knowledge and perceived understanding among participants in cancer clinical trials - factors related to the informed consent procedure.癌症临床试验参与者的知识水平和认知理解——与知情同意程序相关的因素。
Clin Trials. 2011 Feb;8(1):77-84. doi: 10.1177/1740774510384516. Epub 2010 Nov 25.
5
Clinical trials perception in rheumatology patients: experience from a single rheumatology tertiary center.风湿病患者对临床试验的认知:来自一家单一风湿病三级中心的经验
J Rheumatol. 2015 Jun;42(6):988-93. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.141091. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
6
Comparable indicators of therapeutic misconception between epilepsy or Parkinson's disease patients between those with clinical trial experience and trial non-participants.比较有临床试验经验和无临床试验经验的癫痫或帕金森病患者在治疗误解方面的可比指标。
Seizure. 2018 Aug;60:61-67. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2018.06.006. Epub 2018 Jun 9.
7
A Patient-Centered Approach to Informed Consent: Results from a Survey and Randomized Trial.以患者为中心的知情同意方法:一项调查和随机试验的结果
Med Decis Making. 2016 Aug;36(6):726-40. doi: 10.1177/0272989X16636844. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
8
Impact of individual clinical outcomes on trial participants' perspectives on enrollment in emergency research without consent.个体临床结果对试验参与者在未经同意情况下参与紧急研究的招募观点的影响。
Clin Trials. 2017 Apr;14(2):180-186. doi: 10.1177/1740774516677276. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
9
Factors associated with refusal or acceptance of older patients (≥ 65 years) to provide consent to participate in clinical research in cardiology: a qualitative study.与老年患者(≥65 岁)拒绝或同意参与心脏病学临床研究相关的因素:一项定性研究。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2020 Jan;32(1):133-140. doi: 10.1007/s40520-019-01172-z. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
10
Attitudes, understanding, and concerns regarding medical research amongst Egyptians: a qualitative pilot study.埃及人对医学研究的态度、理解和担忧:一项定性试点研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2007 Aug 29;8:9. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-8-9.

引用本文的文献

1
The Attitude of Patients from a Romanian Tertiary Cardiology Center Regarding Participation in Biomarker-Based Clinical Trials.罗马尼亚一家三级心脏病学中心患者对参与基于生物标志物的临床试验的态度。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Oct 31;57(11):1180. doi: 10.3390/medicina57111180.

本文引用的文献

1
Broad Consent for Research on Biospecimens: The Views of Actual Donors at Four U.S. Medical Centers.生物样本研究的广泛同意:美国四个医疗中心实际捐赠者的观点。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2018 Apr;13(2):115-124. doi: 10.1177/1556264617751204. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
2
Clinical trials recruitment planning: A proposed framework from the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative.临床试验招募规划:来自临床试验转型倡议的一个拟议框架
Contemp Clin Trials. 2018 Mar;66:74-79. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2018.01.003. Epub 2018 Jan 9.
3
Participatory improvement of a template for informed consent documents in biobank research - study results and methodological reflections.
生物样本库研究中知情同意书模板的参与式改进——研究结果与方法学思考
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Dec 20;18(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0232-7.
4
The Influence of Race and Ethnicity on Becoming a Human Subject: Factors Associated with Participation in Research.种族和族裔对成为人类受试者的影响:与参与研究相关的因素。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2017 Sep;7:57-63. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2017.05.009. Epub 2017 May 24.
5
Enduring and emerging challenges of informed consent.知情同意的持久和新兴挑战。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Feb 26;372(9):855-62. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1411250.
6
Patient and public attitudes towards informed consent models and levels of awareness of Electronic Health Records in the UK.英国患者及公众对知情同意模式和电子健康记录知晓程度的态度。
Int J Med Inform. 2015 Apr;84(4):237-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.01.008. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
7
Unsuccessful trial accrual and human subjects protections: an empirical analysis of recently closed trials.试验招募失败与人体受试者保护:对近期结束试验的实证分析
Clin Trials. 2015 Feb;12(1):77-83. doi: 10.1177/1740774514558307. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
8
Informed consent: how much awareness is there?知情同意:有多少认知?
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 16;9(10):e110139. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110139. eCollection 2014.
9
Informed consent for biobanking: consensus-based guidelines for adequate comprehension.生物样本库的知情同意:基于共识的充分理解指南。
Genet Med. 2015 Mar;17(3):226-33. doi: 10.1038/gim.2014.102. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
10
Genomic testing in cancer: patient knowledge, attitudes, and expectations.癌症的基因组检测:患者的知识、态度和期望。
Cancer. 2014 Oct 1;120(19):3066-73. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28807. Epub 2014 Jun 24.