Suppr超能文献

临床医生与患者关于动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病预防的风险讨论:对实施2013年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会指南的重要性。

Clinician-patient risk discussion for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease prevention: importance to implementation of the 2013 ACC/AHA Guidelines.

作者信息

Martin Seth S, Sperling Laurence S, Blaha Michael J, Wilson Peter W F, Gluckman Ty J, Blumenthal Roger S, Stone Neil J

机构信息

Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Heart Disease, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Apr 7;65(13):1361-1368. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.01.043.

Abstract

Successful implementation of the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association cholesterol guidelines hinges on a clear understanding of the clinician-patient risk discussion (CPRD). This is a dialogue between the clinician and patient about potential for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk reduction benefits, adverse effects, drug-drug interactions, and patient preferences. Designed especially for primary prevention patients, this process of shared decision making establishes the appropriateness of a statin for a specific patient. CPRD respects the autonomy of an individual striving to make an informed choice aligned with personal values and preferences. Dedicating sufficient time to high-quality CPRD offers an opportunity to strengthen clinician-patient relationships, patient engagement, and medication adherence. We review the guideline-recommended CPRD, the general concept of shared decision making and decision aids, the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Risk Estimator application as an implementation tool, and address potential barriers to implementation.

摘要

2013年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会胆固醇指南的成功实施取决于对临床医生与患者风险讨论(CPRD)的清晰理解。这是临床医生与患者之间关于降低动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病风险的益处、不良反应、药物相互作用以及患者偏好的对话。该共同决策过程专为一级预防患者设计,确定了他汀类药物对特定患者的适用性。CPRD尊重个人自主权,使患者努力做出符合个人价值观和偏好的明智选择。投入足够时间进行高质量的CPRD,为加强临床医生与患者关系、患者参与度和药物依从性提供了机会。我们回顾了指南推荐的CPRD、共同决策和决策辅助工具的一般概念、作为实施工具的美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会风险评估器应用程序,并探讨了实施过程中的潜在障碍。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Evidence-based risk communication: a systematic review.循证风险沟通:系统评价。
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Aug 19;161(4):270-80. doi: 10.7326/M14-0295.
3
Implementation of shared decision making in cardiovascular care: past, present, and future.心血管护理中共同决策的实施:过去、现在与未来。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014 Sep;7(5):797-803. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000351. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
5
The new cholesterol treatment guidelines.新的胆固醇治疗指南。
N Engl J Med. 2014 May 15;370(20):1957. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1403438.
6
Addressing statin adverse effects in the clinic: the 5 Ms.解决临床中的他汀类药物不良反应:5Ms 原则
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2014 Nov;19(6):533-42. doi: 10.1177/1074248414529622. Epub 2014 Apr 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验