Rumbaugh Gavin, Daws Stephanie E, Ozkan Emin D, Rojas Camilo S, Hubbs Christopher R, Aceti Massimiliano, Kilgore Mark, Kudugunti Shashi, Puthanveettil Sathyanarayanan V, Sweatt J David, Rusche James, Miller Courtney A
Department of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, FL, USA.
1] Department of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, FL, USA [2] Department of Metabolism and Aging, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, FL, USA.
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2015 Sep;40(10):2307-16. doi: 10.1038/npp.2015.93. Epub 2015 Apr 3.
Histone deacetylases (HDACs) are promising therapeutic targets for neurological and psychiatric disorders that impact cognitive ability, but the relationship between various HDAC isoforms and cognitive improvement is poorly understood, particularly in mouse models of memory impairment. A goal shared by many is to develop HDAC inhibitors with increased isoform selectivity in order to reduce unwanted side effects, while retaining procognitive effects. However, studies addressing this tack at the molecular, cellular and behavioral level are limited. Therefore, we interrogated the biological effects of class I HDAC inhibitors with varying selectivity and assessed a subset of these compounds for their ability to regulate transcriptional activity, synaptic function and memory. The HDAC-1, -2, and -3 inhibitors, RGFP963 and RGFP968, were most effective at stimulating synaptogenesis, while the selective HDAC3 inhibitor, RGFP966, with known memory enhancing abilities, had minimal impact. Furthermore, RGFP963 increased hippocampal spine density, while HDAC3 inhibition was ineffective. Genome-wide gene expression analysis by RNA sequencing indicated that RGFP963 and RGFP966 induce largely distinct transcriptional profiles in the dorsal hippocampus of mature mice. The results of bioinformatic analyses were consistent with RGFP963 inducing a transcriptional program that enhances synaptic efficacy. Finally, RGFP963, but not RGFP966, rescued memory in a mouse model of Alzheimer's Disease. Together, these studies suggest that the specific memory promoting properties of class I HDAC inhibitors may depend on isoform selectivity and that certain pathological brain states may be more receptive to HDAC inhibitors that improve network function by enhancing synapse efficacy.
组蛋白去乙酰化酶(HDACs)是治疗影响认知能力的神经和精神疾病的有前景的治疗靶点,但各种HDAC亚型与认知改善之间的关系尚不清楚,尤其是在记忆障碍的小鼠模型中。许多人的共同目标是开发具有更高亚型选择性的HDAC抑制剂,以减少不必要的副作用,同时保留促认知作用。然而,在分子、细胞和行为水平上针对这一方向的研究有限。因此,我们研究了具有不同选择性的I类HDAC抑制剂的生物学效应,并评估了这些化合物中的一部分调节转录活性、突触功能和记忆的能力。HDAC-1、-2和-3抑制剂RGFP963和RGFP968在刺激突触形成方面最有效,而具有已知记忆增强能力的选择性HDAC3抑制剂RGFP966影响最小。此外,RGFP963增加了海马棘密度,而抑制HDAC3则无效。通过RNA测序进行的全基因组基因表达分析表明,RGFP963和RGFP966在成熟小鼠的背侧海马中诱导出基本不同的转录谱。生物信息学分析结果与RGFP963诱导增强突触效能的转录程序一致。最后,RGFP963而非RGFP966挽救了阿尔茨海默病小鼠模型中的记忆。总之,这些研究表明I类HDAC抑制剂的特定记忆促进特性可能取决于亚型选择性,并且某些病理性脑状态可能对通过增强突触效能来改善网络功能的HDAC抑制剂更敏感。