• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

联邦和州级碰撞事故数据库中大型卡车数量统计不足:问题程度及提高卡车分类准确性的方法。

Undercounting of large trucks in federal and state crash databases: Extent of problem and how to improve accuracy of truck classifications.

作者信息

Cheung Ivan, Braver Elisa R

机构信息

a National Transportation Safety Board , Washington, D.C.

b Department of Epidemiology and Public Health , University of Maryland School of Medicine , Baltimore , Maryland.

出版信息

Traffic Inj Prev. 2016;17(2):202-8. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1034273. Epub 2015 Apr 2.

DOI:10.1080/15389588.2015.1034273
PMID:25837865
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Prior research suggested that single-unit trucks are undercounted when using vehicle body codes in the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS). This study explored the extent of the misclassification and undercounting problem for crashes in FARS and state crash databases.

METHODS

Truck misclassifications for fatal crashes were explored by comparing the Trucks Involved in Fatal Accidents (TIFA) database with FARS. TIFA used vehicle identification numbers (VINs) and survey information to classify large trucks. This study used VINs to improve the accuracy of large truck classifications in state crash databases from 5 states (Delaware, Maryland, Minnesota, Nebraska, and Utah).

RESULTS

The vehicle body type codes resulted in a 19% undercount of single-unit trucks in FARS and a 23% undercount of single-unit trucks in state databases. Tractor-trailers were misclassified less often. Misclassifications occurred most frequently among single-unit trucks in the weight classes of 10,001-14,000 pounds.

CONCLUSIONS

The amount of misclassification of large trucks is large enough to potentially affect federal and state decisions on traffic safety. Using information from VINs results in more complete and accurate counts of large trucks involved in crashes. The National Transportation Safety Board recommended actions to improve federal and state crash data.

摘要

目的

先前的研究表明,在使用死亡分析报告系统(FARS)中的车身代码时,单单元卡车被低估。本研究探讨了FARS和州碰撞数据库中碰撞事故的错误分类和计数不足问题的程度。

方法

通过将致命事故中涉及的卡车(TIFA)数据库与FARS进行比较,探讨致命碰撞事故中卡车的错误分类情况。TIFA使用车辆识别号码(VIN)和调查信息对大型卡车进行分类。本研究使用VIN来提高来自5个州(特拉华州、马里兰州、明尼苏达州、内布拉斯加州和犹他州)的州碰撞数据库中大型卡车分类的准确性。

结果

车身类型代码导致FARS中单单元卡车被低估19%,州数据库中单单元卡车被低估23%。牵引式挂车的错误分类较少。错误分类在重量等级为10,001 - 14,000磅的单单元卡车中最为频繁发生。

结论

大型卡车的错误分类数量大到足以潜在地影响联邦和州关于交通安全的决策。使用VIN中的信息可使涉及碰撞事故的大型卡车的计数更完整和准确。国家运输安全委员会建议采取行动改进联邦和州的碰撞数据。

相似文献

1
Undercounting of large trucks in federal and state crash databases: Extent of problem and how to improve accuracy of truck classifications.联邦和州级碰撞事故数据库中大型卡车数量统计不足:问题程度及提高卡车分类准确性的方法。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2016;17(2):202-8. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1034273. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
2
Potential benefits of underride guards in large truck side crashes.大型卡车侧面碰撞中防钻入装置的潜在好处。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2012;13(6):592-9. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2012.666595.
3
Hospitalizations and fatalities in crashes with light trucks.与轻型卡车碰撞导致的住院和死亡。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15(2):165-71. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2013.803279.
4
Defective equipment and tractor-trailer crash involvement.设备故障与牵引式挂车碰撞事故
Accid Anal Prev. 1989 Oct;21(5):469-81. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(89)90007-9.
5
Crash avoidance potential of four large truck technologies.四种大型卡车技术的防撞潜力。
Accid Anal Prev. 2012 Nov;49:338-46. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.10.033. Epub 2012 Jul 2.
6
Crash risk factors for interstate large trucks in North Carolina.北卡罗来纳州州际大型卡车的碰撞风险因素。
J Safety Res. 2017 Sep;62:13-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2017.05.002. Epub 2017 May 13.
7
Effectiveness of front crash prevention systems in reducing large truck real-world crash rates.正面碰撞预防系统在降低大型卡车实际碰撞率方面的有效性。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2021;22(4):284-289. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2021.1893700. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
8
Assessing crash risk considering vehicle interactions with trucks using point detector data.利用点探测器数据评估考虑与卡车相互作用的碰撞风险。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Sep;130:75-83. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
9
Occupant deaths in large truck crashes in the United States: 25 years of experience.美国大型卡车碰撞事故中的驾乘人员死亡情况:25年的经验总结。
Accid Anal Prev. 2003 Sep;35(5):731-9. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(02)00053-2.
10
An empirical analysis of run-off-road injury severity crashes involving large trucks.涉及大型卡车的冲出道路伤害严重程度事故的实证分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 May;102:93-100. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.02.024. Epub 2017 Mar 6.