Topçuoglu Hüseyin S, Akti Ahmet, Düzgün Salih, Ceyhanli Kadir Tolga, Topçuoglu Gamze
1 Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Erciyes University, Kayseri - Turkey.
Int J Artif Organs. 2015 Mar;38(3):165-9. doi: 10.5301/ijao.5000398. Epub 2015 Mar 26.
The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of different final irrigation techniques to remove artificially placed dentinal debris from a simulated internal root resorption (IRR) cavity.
Seventy teeth were prepared using the ProTaper system. The roots were then split longitudinally into two halves, in each of which standardized IRR cavities were prepared. Five teeth were set aside to serve as negative control group. Each cavity of the remaining 65 teeth was filled with dentin debris mixed with 2.5% NaOCl. Another 5 teeth (positive control) were not subjected to the debris removal procedure. Sixty teeth were randomly divided into four experimental groups (n = 15), according to the final irrigation technique used: conventional syringe irrigation (CSI), the Self-Adjusting File (SAF), passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), and the EndoActivator (EA). Ten milliliters of 2.5% NaOCl was used during the debris removal procedure. The root halves were disassembled, and the amount of remaining debris was evaluated under a stereomicroscope at 30× magnification.
SAF and PUI removed debris significantly better than CSI and EA (P<.05). CSI was the least effective in debris removal (p<0.05).
None of the irrigation techniques used was able to completely remove debris from simulated IRR cavities.
本研究旨在比较不同的最终冲洗技术从模拟的牙根内吸收(IRR)腔中清除人工放置的牙本质碎屑的效率。
使用ProTaper系统制备70颗牙齿。然后将牙根纵向劈成两半,在每一半中制备标准化的IRR腔。留出5颗牙齿作为阴性对照组。其余65颗牙齿的每个腔都填充有与2.5%次氯酸钠混合的牙本质碎屑。另外5颗牙齿(阳性对照组)未进行碎屑清除程序。根据使用的最终冲洗技术,将60颗牙齿随机分为四个实验组(n = 15):传统注射器冲洗(CSI)、自调式锉(SAF)、被动超声冲洗(PUI)和EndoActivator(EA)。在碎屑清除程序中使用10毫升2.5%次氯酸钠。将牙根半体拆开,在30倍放大率的体视显微镜下评估残留碎屑的量。
SAF和PUI清除碎屑的效果明显优于CSI和EA(P<.05)。CSI在清除碎屑方面效果最差(p<0.05)。
所使用的冲洗技术均无法完全从模拟的IRR腔中清除碎屑。