Suppr超能文献

在神经伦理学课程中进行主动学习对本科生的道德判断发展有积极影响。

Active learning in a neuroethics course positively impacts moral judgment development in undergraduates.

作者信息

Abu-Odeh Desiree, Dziobek Derek, Jimenez Nathalia Torres, Barbey Christopher, Dubinsky Janet M

机构信息

M.A. Program in Bioethics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455; ; Doctor of Philosophy Program, Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032;

Graduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455;

出版信息

J Undergrad Neurosci Educ. 2015 Mar 15;13(2):A110-9. eCollection 2015 Spring.

Abstract

The growing neuroscientific understanding of the biological basis of behaviors has profound social and ethical implications. To address the need for public awareness of the consequences of these advances, we developed an undergraduate neuroethics course, Neuroscience and Society, at the University of Minnesota. Course evolution, objectives, content, and impact are described here. To engage all students and facilitate undergraduate ethics education, this course employed daily reading, writing, and student discussion, case analysis, and team presentations with goals of fostering development of moral reasoning and judgment and introducing application of bioethical frameworks to topics raised by neuroscience. Pre- and post-course Defining Issues Test (DIT) scores and student end-of-course reflections demonstrated that course objectives for student application of bioethical frameworks to neuroethical issues were met. The active-learning, student-centered pedagogical approaches used to achieve these goals serve as a model for how to effectively teach neuroethics at the undergraduate level.

摘要

神经科学对行为生物学基础的理解不断深入,具有深远的社会和伦理意义。为满足公众对这些进展后果的认识需求,我们在明尼苏达大学开设了一门本科神经伦理学课程——《神经科学与社会》。本文描述了该课程的演变、目标、内容和影响。为了让所有学生参与进来并促进本科伦理教育,本课程采用每日阅读、写作、学生讨论、案例分析和小组展示的方式,目标是培养道德推理和判断能力,并介绍生物伦理框架在神经科学提出的主题中的应用。课程前后的界定问题测试(DIT)分数以及学生课程结束时的反思表明,课程关于学生将生物伦理框架应用于神经伦理问题的目标得以实现。用于实现这些目标的主动学习、以学生为中心的教学方法,为本科阶段有效教授神经伦理学提供了一个范例。

相似文献

1
Active learning in a neuroethics course positively impacts moral judgment development in undergraduates.
J Undergrad Neurosci Educ. 2015 Mar 15;13(2):A110-9. eCollection 2015 Spring.
4
Lessons learned from undergraduate students in designing a science-based course in bioethics.
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2013 Winter;12(4):701-10. doi: 10.1187/cbe.13-01-0012.
5
A comparative review on neuroethical issues in neuroscientific and neuroethical journals.
Front Neurosci. 2023 Sep 14;17:1160611. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1160611. eCollection 2023.
6
Brain literate: making neuroscience accessible to a wider audience of undergraduates.
J Undergrad Neurosci Educ. 2015 Mar 15;13(2):A64-73. eCollection 2015 Spring.
7
Changes in moral reasoning and the teaching of medical ethics.
Med Educ. 1995 Nov;29(6):420-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1995.tb02865.x.
8
The New Ethics of Neuroethics.
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2018 Oct;27(4):558-565. doi: 10.1017/S0963180118000087.
9
Development of a moral judgment measure for veterinary education.
J Vet Med Educ. 2014 Autumn;41(3):258-64. doi: 10.3138/jvme.1113-152R1.
10
Validity study using factor analyses on the Defining Issues Test-2 in undergraduate populations.
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 31;15(8):e0238110. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238110. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
How to Integrate Neuroethics into a Neuroscience Course - And Drive Student Engagement with Core Concepts.
J Undergrad Neurosci Educ. 2024 Dec 24;23(1):A26-A34. doi: 10.59390/ZBGO4273. eCollection 2024 Fall.
2
East Asian perspective of responsible research and innovation in neurotechnology.
IBRO Neurosci Rep. 2024 May 5;16:582-597. doi: 10.1016/j.ibneur.2024.04.009. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Effective Use of Student-Created Case Studies as Assessment in an Undergraduate Neuroscience Course.
J Undergrad Neurosci Educ. 2021 Jun 20;19(2):A141-A162. eCollection 2021 Spring.

本文引用的文献

1
What ethics integration looks like in neuroscience research.
Ann Neurol. 2014 May;75(5):623-4. doi: 10.1002/ana.24177. Epub 2014 May 19.
2
The Presidential Bioethics Commission: pedagogical materials and bioethics education.
Hastings Cent Rep. 2013 Sep-Oct;43(5):16-9. doi: 10.1002/hast.207.
4
Science, human nature, and a new paradigm for ethics education.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2012 Sep;18(3):543-9. doi: 10.1007/s11948-012-9373-8. Epub 2012 Jun 19.
5
Fostering critical thinking, reasoning, and argumentation skills through bioethics education.
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36791. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036791. Epub 2012 May 11.
6
The effectiveness of ethics education: a quasi-experimental field study.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2013 Jun;19(2):545-68. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9349-0. Epub 2012 Jan 3.
7
More education, less administration: reflections of neuroimagers' attitudes to ethics through the qualitative looking glass.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2012 Dec;18(4):775-88. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9282-2. Epub 2011 May 28.
9
Neurotalk: improving the communication of neuroscience research.
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010 Jan;11(1):61-9. doi: 10.1038/nrn2773. Epub 2009 Dec 2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验