Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research Centre, Lethbridge, Alberta T1J 4B1, Canada.
Alberta Innovates Technology Futures, Edmonton, Alberta T6N 1E4, Canada.
Sci Total Environ. 2015 Jul 15;521-522:191-9. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.03.080. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
Veterinary antimicrobials are introduced to wider environments by manure application to agricultural fields or through leaching or runoff from manure storage areas (feedlots, stockpiles, windrows, lagoons). Detected in manure, manure-treated soils, and surface and ground water near intensive cattle feeding operations, there is a concern that environmental contamination by these chemicals may promote the development of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria. Surface runoff and leaching appear to be major transport pathways by which veterinary antimicrobials eventually contaminate surface and ground water, respectively. A study was conducted to investigate the transport of three veterinary antimicrobials (chlortetracycline, sulfamethazine, tylosin), commonly used in beef cattle production, in simulated rainfall runoff from feedlot pens. Mean concentrations of veterinary antimicrobials were 1.4 to 3.5 times higher in surface material from bedding vs. non-bedding pen areas. Runoff rates and volumetric runoff coefficients were similar across all treatments but both were significantly higher from non-bedding (0.53Lmin(-1); 0.27) than bedding areas (0.40Lmin(-1); 0.19). In keeping with concentrations in pen surface material, mean concentrations of veterinary antimicrobials were 1.4 to 2.5 times higher in runoff generated from bedding vs. non-bedding pen areas. Water solubility and sorption coefficient of antimicrobials played a role in their transport in runoff. Estimated amounts of chlortetracycline, sulfamethazine, and tylosin that could potentially be transported to the feedlot catch basin during a one in 100-year precipitation event were 1.3 to 3.6ghead(-1), 1.9ghead(-1), and 0.2ghead(-1), respectively. This study demonstrates the magnitude of veterinary antimicrobial transport in feedlot pen runoff and supports the necessity of catch basins for runoff containment within feedlots.
兽医抗菌药物通过施用于农田的粪便或通过粪肥储存区(饲养场、堆存区、条垛、泻湖)的沥滤或径流而进入更广泛的环境。在粪便、施用过粪便的土壤以及集约化养牛场附近的地表水和地下水都检测到这些化学物质,人们担心这些化学物质对环境的污染可能会促进细菌对抗菌药物耐药性的发展。地表径流和沥滤似乎是兽医抗菌药物最终分别污染地表水和地下水的主要迁移途径。本研究旨在调查三种常用于肉牛生产的兽医抗菌药物(金霉素、磺胺嘧啶、泰乐菌素)在饲养场畜栏模拟降雨径流下的迁移情况。垫料区和非垫料区畜栏表面物质中的兽医抗菌药物浓度平均分别高出 1.4 至 3.5 倍。所有处理的径流出流率和体积径流出流系数相似,但非垫料区(0.53Lmin(-1);0.27)显著高于垫料区(0.40Lmin(-1);0.19)。与畜栏表面材料中的浓度一致,垫料区和非垫料区畜栏产生的径流中的兽医抗菌药物浓度平均分别高出 1.4 至 2.5 倍。抗菌药物的水溶性和吸附系数在其径流迁移中起作用。在 100 年一遇的降水事件中,有可能通过径流输送到饲养场集水池的金霉素、磺胺嘧啶和泰乐菌素的估计量分别为 1.3 至 3.6ghead(-1)、1.9ghead(-1)和 0.2ghead(-1)。本研究证明了饲养场畜栏径流中兽医抗菌药物迁移的规模,并支持在饲养场中使用集水池来控制径流。