Kläning Eva, Christensen Brian, Bajic Goran, Hoffmann Søren V, Jones Nykola C, Callesen Morten M, Andersen Gregers R, Sørensen Esben S, Vorup-Jensen Thomas
Dept. of Molecular Biology and Genetics Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Dept. of Biomedicine, Denmark.
Dept. of Molecular Biology and Genetics Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015 Aug;1854(8):930-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2015.03.008. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
Integrin α(X)β(2) (also known as complement receptor 4, p150,95, or CD11c/CD18) is expressed in the cell membrane of myeloid leukocytes. α(X)β(2) has been reported to bind a large number of structurally unrelated ligands, often with a shared molecular character in the presence of polyanionic stretches in poorly folded proteins or glucosaminoglycans. Nevertheless, it is unclear what chemical sources of polyanionicity enable the binding by α(X)β(2). Osteopontin (OPN) is an intrinsically disordered protein, which facilitates phagocytosis via the integrin α(X)β(2). Unlike for other integrins, neither the RGD nor the SVVYGLR motifs account for this binding, and the molecular basis of OPN binding by α(X)β(2) remains uncharacterized. Here, we show that the monovalent interactions between the ligand-binding domain of α(X)β(2) and OPN, its fragments, or caseins are weak, with dissociation constants higher than 10(-5)M but with high apparent stoichiometries. From comparison with cell adhesion studies, the discrimination between α(X)β(2) ligands and non-ligands appears to rely on these apparent stoichiometries in a way, which involves glutamate rather than aspartate side chains. Surprisingly, the extensive, negatively charged phosphorylation of OPN is not contributing to α(X)β(2) binding. Furthermore, synchrotron radiation circular spectroscopy excludes that the phosphorylation affects the general folding of OPN. Taken together, our quantitative analyses reveal a mode of ligand recognition by integrin α(X)β(2), which seem to differ in principles considerably from other OPN receptors.
整合素α(X)β(2)(也称为补体受体4、p150,95或CD11c/CD18)在髓系白细胞的细胞膜中表达。据报道,α(X)β(2)可结合大量结构不相关的配体,这些配体在折叠不良的蛋白质或糖胺聚糖中存在聚阴离子片段时通常具有共同的分子特征。然而,尚不清楚何种聚阴离子化学来源能够使α(X)β(2)进行结合。骨桥蛋白(OPN)是一种内在无序的蛋白质,它通过整合素α(X)β(2)促进吞噬作用。与其他整合素不同,RGD和SVVYGLR基序均不能解释这种结合,α(X)β(2)与OPN结合的分子基础仍未明确。在这里,我们表明α(X)β(2)的配体结合域与OPN、其片段或酪蛋白之间的单价相互作用较弱,解离常数高于10^(-5)M,但具有较高的表观化学计量。通过与细胞粘附研究的比较,α(X)β(2)配体与非配体之间的区分似乎在某种程度上依赖于这些表观化学计量,其中涉及谷氨酸而非天冬氨酸侧链。令人惊讶的是,OPN广泛的负电荷磷酸化对α(X)β(2)的结合没有贡献。此外,同步辐射圆二色光谱排除了磷酸化影响OPN的总体折叠。综上所述,我们的定量分析揭示了整合素α(X)β(2)识别配体的一种模式,这似乎在原则上与其他OPN受体有很大不同。