Oran Betül, Jimenez Antonio M, De Lima Marcos, Popat Uday R, Bassett Roland, Andersson Borje, Borthakur Gautam, Bashir Qaiser, Chen Julianne, Ciurea Stefan O, Jabbour Elias, Cortes Jorge, Kebriaei Partow, Khouri Issa F, Qazilbash Muzaffar H, Ravandi Farhad, Rondon Gabriela, Lu Xinyan, Shpall Elizabeth J, Champlin Richard E
Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
University Hospitals and Case Western Reserve University, , Cleveland, OH.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015 Aug;21(8):1405-1412. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.03.023. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
We evaluated the prognostic significance of a modified European LeukemiaNet (ELN) classification for patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) while in first complete remission (CR1). We analyzed 464 AML patients with matched related (n = 211, 45.5%), matched unrelated (n = 176, 37.9%), and mismatched donors (n = 77, 16.6%). Patients were classified into 4 modified ELN risk groups (favorable, intermediate-I, intermediate-II, and adverse) separately for 354 patients age < 60 years and 110 patients age ≥ 60 years. In this modified version of ELN classification, patients with normal cytogenetic were classified by FLT3-ITD mutational status: favorable risk if FLT3-ITDwild and intermediate-I if FLT3-ITDmut. The best outcomes occurred in the ELN favorable and intermediate-II groups in younger AML patients and in the favorable and intermediate-I groups in older AML patients. Older AML patients had worse transplant outcomes within each modified ELN risk group except intermediate-I when compared with younger patients; leukemia-free survival at 3 years was 67.8% versus 49.8% in favorable, 53.4% versus 50.7% in intermediate-I, 65.7% versus 20.2% in intermediate-II, and 44.6% versus 23.8% in adverse group younger and older patients, respectively. Among lesion-specific abnormalities, del5q/-5 and abnl(17p) had the worse transplant outcomes, with 3-year leukemia-free survival rates of 18.4% and 20% in younger CR1 patients. In conclusion, the modified ELN prognostic classification developed for chemotherapy outcomes also identifies prognostic groups for HSCT, which is useful for a selection of patients for post-transplant strategies to improve outcomes.
我们评估了改良版欧洲白血病网络(ELN)分类对首次完全缓解(CR1)期接受造血干细胞移植(HSCT)的急性髓系白血病(AML)患者的预后意义。我们分析了464例AML患者,其中有匹配的亲属供者(n = 211,45.5%)、匹配的非亲属供者(n = 176,37.9%)和不匹配供者(n = 77,16.6%)。分别将354例年龄<60岁和110例年龄≥60岁的患者分为4个改良ELN风险组(低危、中危-I、中危-II和高危)。在这个改良版ELN分类中,细胞遗传学正常的患者根据FLT3-ITD突变状态分类:FLT3-ITD野生型为低危,FLT3-ITD突变型为中危-I。在年轻AML患者中,最佳预后出现在ELN低危和中危-II组;在老年AML患者中,最佳预后出现在低危和中危-I组。与年轻患者相比,除中危-I组外,老年AML患者在每个改良ELN风险组中的移植结局都更差;低危组3年无白血病生存率在年轻和老年患者中分别为67.8%和49.8%,中危-I组分别为53.4%和50.7%,中危-II组分别为65.7%和20.2%,高危组分别为44.6%和23.8%。在特定病变异常中,del5q/-5和abnl(17p)的移植结局最差,CR1期年轻患者的3年无白血病生存率分别为18.4%和20%。总之,为化疗结局制定的改良ELN预后分类也可识别HSCT的预后组,这有助于选择患者进行移植后策略以改善结局。