Oran Betül, de Lima Marcos, Garcia-Manero Guillermo, Thall Peter F, Lin Ruitao, Popat Uday, Alousi Amin M, Hosing Chitra, Giralt Sergio, Rondon Gabriela, Woodworth Glenda, Champlin Richard E
Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
University Hospitals of Cleveland and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH.
Blood Adv. 2020 Nov 10;4(21):5580-5588. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002544.
This study investigated the efficacy and safety of azacitidine maintenance in the posttransplant setting based on the encouraging phase 1/2 reports for azacitidine maintenance in patients with acute myeloid leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome (AML/MDS). Between 2009 and 2017, a total of 187 patients aged 18 to 75 years were entered into a randomized controlled study of posttransplant azacitidine if they were in complete remission. Patients randomized to the treatment arm (n = 93) were scheduled to receive azacitidine, given as 32 mg/m2 per day subcutaneously for 5 days every 28 days for 12 cycles. The control arm (n = 94) had no intervention. Eighty-seven of the 93 patients started azacitidine maintenance. The median number of cycles received was 4; a total of 29 patients relapsed on study, and 23 patients withdrew from the study due to toxicity, patient's preference, or logistical reasons. Median relapse-free survival (RFS) was 2.07 years in the azacitidine group vs 1.28 years in the control group (P = .43). There was also no significant difference for overall survival, with a median of 2.52 years vs 2.56 years in the azacitidine and control groups (P = .85), respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed no improvement in RFS or overall survival with the use of azacitidine as maintenance compared with the control group (hazard ratios of 0.73 [95% confidence interval, 0.49-1.1; P = .14] and 0.84 [95% confidence interval, 0.55-1.29; P = .43]) [corrected]. This randomized trial with azacitidine maintenance showed that a prospective trial in the posttransplant setting was feasible and safe but challenging. Although RFS was comparable between the 2 arms, we believe the strategy of maintenance therapy merits further study with a goal to reduce the risk of relapse in patients with AML/MDS. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00887068.
基于急性髓系白血病/骨髓增生异常综合征(AML/MDS)患者接受阿扎胞苷维持治疗的1/2期报告令人鼓舞,本研究调查了移植后应用阿扎胞苷维持治疗的疗效和安全性。2009年至2017年期间,共有187名年龄在18至75岁之间、处于完全缓解状态的患者进入移植后阿扎胞苷的随机对照研究。随机分配至治疗组(n = 93)的患者计划接受阿扎胞苷治疗,剂量为每天32 mg/m²,皮下注射,每28天给药5天,共12个周期。对照组(n = 94)不进行干预。93名患者中有87名开始阿扎胞苷维持治疗。接受治疗的周期数中位数为4;共有29名患者在研究期间复发,23名患者因毒性、患者偏好或后勤原因退出研究。阿扎胞苷组的无复发生存期(RFS)中位数为2.07年,而对照组为1.28年(P = 0.43)。总生存期也无显著差异,阿扎胞苷组和对照组的中位数分别为2.52年和2.56年(P = 0.85)。多变量Cox回归分析显示,与对照组相比,使用阿扎胞苷作为维持治疗并未改善RFS或总生存期(风险比分别为0.73 [95%置信区间,0.49 - 1.1;P = 0.14]和0.84 [95%置信区间,0.55 - 1.29;P = 0.43])[校正后]。这项阿扎胞苷维持治疗的随机试验表明,在移植后环境中进行前瞻性试验是可行且安全的,但具有挑战性。尽管两组之间的RFS相当,但我们认为维持治疗策略值得进一步研究,目标是降低AML/MDS患者的复发风险。本试验在www.clinicaltrials.gov上注册,注册号为#NCT008