• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较颈动脉和肱动脉僵硬度:迈向动脉树力学图谱绘制的第一步。

Comparing Carotid and Brachial Artery Stiffness: A First Step Toward Mechanical Mapping of the Arterial Tree.

作者信息

Maurice Roch L, Vaujois Laurence, Dahdah Nagib, Nuyt Anne-Monique, Bigras Jean-Luc

机构信息

Service de Cardiologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine (CHUSJ), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada; Centre de Recherche, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine (CRCHUSJ), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.

Service de Cardiologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine (CHUSJ), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.

出版信息

Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015 Jul;41(7):1808-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.02.013. Epub 2015 Apr 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.02.013
PMID:25840477
Abstract

Arterial stiffness is a predictor of cardiovascular mortality. It increases with age and is accelerated by hypertension and other cardiovascular risk factors. In addition to the disease state, arterial stiffness increases from the proximal to the distal arterial compartments. Concurrent assessment of various vessels from the same subjects is unavailable in the literature. The aim of this work was to quantify an intrinsic mechanical feature, namely, wall stiffness, of the common carotid artery (CCA) and brachial artery (BA). CCAs and BAs of healthy adolescents were investigated. Cine loops of CCA and BA B-mode data were digitally recorded at the same clinical examination, and arterial elastic moduli were estimated off-line with our proprietary non-invasive Imaging-based BioMarker (ImBioMark) algorithm. The 11 study subjects were 14.4 ± 1.2 years old, with normal body habitus and blood pressures 112.3 ± 10.6/63.6 ± 5.7 mm Hg. BAs had a higher elastic modulus than CCAs (arterial elastic moduli: 129.73 ± 25.67 kPa vs. 49.55 ± 14.75 kPa, p < 0.001). There was a positive correlation between the BA and CCA (slope = 0.36, intercept = 111.62 kPa, R(2) = 0.045). This article documents, for the first time, a correlation between the CCA and BA of the same subject, under the same conditions. We previously reported preliminary data for the aorta and documented the effect of aging on the CCA; we now intend to study the femoral artery as well and include age stratification to pursue our investigations. The results reported here can be seen as the first step toward mechanical mapping of the arterial tree.

摘要

动脉僵硬度是心血管疾病死亡率的一个预测指标。它随年龄增长而增加,并因高血压和其他心血管危险因素而加速上升。除了疾病状态外,动脉僵硬度从近端到远端动脉节段也会增加。文献中尚无对同一受试者的不同血管进行同步评估的报道。本研究的目的是量化颈总动脉(CCA)和肱动脉(BA)的一种内在力学特征,即管壁僵硬度。对健康青少年的CCA和BA进行了研究。在同一次临床检查中对CCA和BA的B模式数据进行数字记录,并使用我们专有的基于成像的无创生物标志物(ImBioMark)算法离线估计动脉弹性模量。11名研究对象的年龄为14.4±1.2岁,身体状况正常,血压为112.3±10.6/63.6±5.7 mmHg。BA的弹性模量高于CCA(动脉弹性模量:129.73±25.67 kPa对49.55±14.75 kPa,p<0.001)。BA和CCA之间存在正相关(斜率=0.36,截距=111.62 kPa,R²=0.045)。本文首次记录了在相同条件下同一受试者的CCA和BA之间的相关性。我们之前报告了主动脉的初步数据,并记录了衰老对CCA的影响;我们现在打算对股动脉也进行研究,并纳入年龄分层以继续我们的研究。这里报告的结果可被视为动脉树力学图谱研究的第一步。

相似文献

1
Comparing Carotid and Brachial Artery Stiffness: A First Step Toward Mechanical Mapping of the Arterial Tree.比较颈动脉和肱动脉僵硬度:迈向动脉树力学图谱绘制的第一步。
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015 Jul;41(7):1808-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.02.013. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
2
Carotid wall elastography to assess midterm vascular dysfunction secondary to intrauterine growth restriction: feasibility and comparison with standardized intima-media thickness.颈动脉壁弹性成像评估宫内生长受限继发的中期血管功能障碍:可行性及与标准化内膜中层厚度的比较
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2014 May;40(5):864-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2013.11.013. Epub 2014 Feb 2.
3
Assessment of the arterial stiffness in patients with acute ischemic stroke using longitudinal elasticity modulus measurements obtained with Shear Wave Elastography.使用剪切波弹性成像获得的纵向弹性模量测量值评估急性缺血性中风患者的动脉僵硬度。
Med Ultrason. 2016 Jun;18(2):182-9. doi: 10.11152/mu.2013.2066.182.wav.
4
Study of the effects of age and body mass index on the carotid wall vibration: extraction methodology and analysis.年龄和体重指数对颈动脉壁振动的影响研究:提取方法与分析
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2014 Jul;228(7):714-29. doi: 10.1177/0954411914541090. Epub 2014 Jun 27.
5
Associations of arterial distensibility between carotid arteries and abdominal aorta by MR.通过磁共振成像(MR)研究颈动脉与腹主动脉之间动脉扩张性的相关性。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Apr;41(4):1138-42. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24631. Epub 2014 Apr 4.
6
Axial and radial waveforms in common carotid artery: an advanced method for studying arterial elastic properties in ultrasound imaging.颈总动脉的轴向和径向波形:超声成像中研究动脉弹性特性的一种先进方法。
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013 Jul;39(7):1168-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2013.01.018. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
7
Echo-tracking technology assessment of carotid artery stiffness in patients with coronary slow flow.冠状动脉慢血流患者颈动脉僵硬度的回声跟踪技术评估
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015 Jan;41(1):72-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2014.08.015. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
8
Estimated glomerular filtration rate and urinary albumin excretion are independently associated with greater arterial stiffness: the Hoorn Study.估算肾小球滤过率和尿白蛋白排泄与更高的动脉僵硬度独立相关:霍恩研究。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007 Jun;18(6):1942-52. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2006111217. Epub 2007 Apr 25.
9
Arterial stiffness increases with deteriorating glucose tolerance status: the Hoorn Study.动脉僵硬度随葡萄糖耐量状态恶化而增加:霍恩研究
Circulation. 2003 Apr 29;107(16):2089-95. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000065222.34933.FC. Epub 2003 Apr 14.
10
Ultrasound-based radial and longitudinal strain estimation of the carotid artery: a feasibility study.基于超声的颈动脉径向和纵向应变评估:一项可行性研究。
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2011 Oct;58(10):2244-51. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2011.2074.

引用本文的文献

1
The "Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" of Endothelial Dysfunction Markers in Human Fertility.内皮功能障碍标志物在人类生育中的“星际迷航指南”。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Mar 4;22(5):2584. doi: 10.3390/ijms22052584.