• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受乳房手术患者乳房重建术后的静脉血栓栓塞:美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划分析

Venous Thromboembolism after Breast Reconstruction in Patients Undergoing Breast Surgery: An American College of Surgeons NSQIP Analysis.

作者信息

Nwaogu Iheoma, Yan Yan, Margenthaler Julie A, Myckatyn Terence M

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.

Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.

出版信息

J Am Coll Surg. 2015 May;220(5):886-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.01.031. Epub 2015 Jan 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.01.031
PMID:25840544
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Given the grave consequences of venous thromboembolic (VTE) events, we examined the impact of breast reconstruction on VTE incidence in patients undergoing breast operations and, secondarily, assess the risk factors associated with VTE.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients undergoing breast operations were identified in the 2007 to 2011 American College of Surgeons NSQIP database. The patients were divided into the following treatment categories: lumpectomy, mastectomy, mastectomy with reconstruction, and reconstruction. Missing data were imputed and propensity score weighting was used to balance confounders in each group. Venous thromboembolism incidence was compared across the groups and risk factors for VTE were analyzed using stepwise multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

Overall, 68,285 patients were identified. The global incidence of VTE was 0.27%. The incidence of VTE was highest in the reconstruction and mastectomy with reconstruction groups (0.41% and 0.52% compared with 0.13% in the lumpectomy and 0.29% in the mastectomy groups; p < 0.0001). Independent risk factors for VTE included operation in the 30 days preceding breast surgery (0.56% vs 0.26% for none; p = 0.002), higher BMI (p < 0.0001), increased operative time (p < 0.0001), increased length of hospital stay (p < 0.0001), and oddly, nonsmoking status (0.29% vs 0.14% for smokers; p = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

Breast reconstruction, higher BMI, increased operative time, operation within 30 days preceding breast surgery, and nonsmoking status are independent risk factors for VTE. The association of lower VTE rates with smoking is counterintuitive and might represent more aggressive VTE prophylaxis in this patient population. Additional investigation is warranted to understand this relationship.

摘要

背景

鉴于静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)事件的严重后果,我们研究了乳房重建对接受乳房手术患者VTE发生率的影响,其次,评估与VTE相关的危险因素。

研究设计

在2007年至2011年美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(NSQIP)数据库中识别接受乳房手术的患者。患者分为以下治疗类别:乳房肿瘤切除术、乳房切除术、乳房切除术后重建术和单纯重建术。对缺失数据进行插补,并使用倾向评分加权来平衡每组中的混杂因素。比较各组之间的静脉血栓栓塞发生率,并使用逐步多因素逻辑回归分析VTE的危险因素。

结果

总体而言,共识别出68285例患者。VTE的总体发生率为0.27%。VTE发生率在重建组和乳房切除术后重建组中最高(分别为0.41%和0.52%,而乳房肿瘤切除术组为0.13%,乳房切除术组为0.29%;p<0.0001)。VTE的独立危险因素包括在乳房手术前30天内进行手术(有手术与无手术相比为0.56%对0.26%;p = 0.002)、较高的体重指数(p<0.0001)、手术时间延长(p<0.0001)、住院时间延长(p<0.0001),奇怪的是,还有非吸烟状态(非吸烟者为0.29%,吸烟者为0.14%;p = 0.012)。

结论

乳房重建、较高的体重指数、手术时间延长、乳房手术前30天内进行手术以及非吸烟状态是VTE的独立危险因素。VTE发生率较低与吸烟之间的关联有悖常理,可能代表该患者群体中更积极的VTE预防措施。有必要进行进一步调查以了解这种关系。

相似文献

1
Venous Thromboembolism after Breast Reconstruction in Patients Undergoing Breast Surgery: An American College of Surgeons NSQIP Analysis.接受乳房手术患者乳房重建术后的静脉血栓栓塞:美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划分析
J Am Coll Surg. 2015 May;220(5):886-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.01.031. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
2
Balancing venous thromboembolism and hematoma after breast surgery.平衡乳房手术后的静脉血栓栓塞和血肿。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Oct;19(10):3230-5. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2524-y. Epub 2012 Jul 21.
3
Predictive risk factors of venous thromboembolism in autologous breast reconstruction surgery.自体乳房重建手术中静脉血栓栓塞的预测风险因素
Ann Plast Surg. 2014 Jan;72(1):30-3. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000003.
4
Venous Thromboembolism After Surgical Treatment of Breast Cancer.乳腺癌手术治疗后的静脉血栓栓塞
Ann Plast Surg. 2018 Feb;80(2):188-192. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001249.
5
Risk factors associated with venous thromboembolism in 49,028 mastectomy patients.49028 例乳房切除术患者静脉血栓栓塞的相关风险因素。
Breast. 2013 Aug;22(4):444-8. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2013.04.018. Epub 2013 May 18.
6
Does the presence of thyroid cancer increase the risk of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing thyroidectomy?甲状腺癌患者行甲状腺切除术是否会增加静脉血栓栓塞的风险?
Surgery. 2011 Dec;150(6):1275-85. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.09.040.
7
Contributors to post-operative venous thromboembolism risk after breast cancer surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.乳腺癌手术后术后静脉血栓栓塞风险的相关因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2024 Jul;94:106-118. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.05.003. Epub 2024 May 10.
8
Incidence and risk factors for venous thromboembolism in bilateral breast reduction surgery: An analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.双侧乳房缩小手术中静脉血栓栓塞的发生率及危险因素:一项国家外科质量改进计划分析
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017 Nov;70(11):1514-1519. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2017.05.050. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
9
Risk factors for post-discharge venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing colorectal resection: a NSQIP analysis.接受结直肠切除术的患者出院后静脉血栓栓塞的风险因素:NSQIP 分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2018 Dec;22(12):955-964. doi: 10.1007/s10151-018-1909-8. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
10
Clinical factors associated with venous thromboembolism risk in patients undergoing craniotomy.开颅手术患者静脉血栓栓塞风险的相关临床因素。
J Neurosurg. 2015 May;122(5):1004-11. doi: 10.3171/2014.10.JNS14632. Epub 2014 Dec 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Mapping the clinical topography and progression of venous thromboembolism in Chinese breast cancer surgical patients: a prospective longitudinal study.绘制中国乳腺癌手术患者静脉血栓栓塞的临床地形图及进展:一项前瞻性纵向研究。
Breast Cancer. 2025 Jul 24. doi: 10.1007/s12282-025-01748-w.
2
Impact of COVID-19 on Thrombotic Complications in Microsurgery: Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Outcomes Amid Pandemic.2019冠状病毒病对显微外科血栓形成并发症的影响:大流行期间腹壁下深动脉穿支皮瓣手术的结果
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025 Feb 14;13(2):e6544. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006544. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Efficacy and Safety of Low Molecular Weight Heparin and Mechanical Thromboprophylaxis in Immediate Implant-based Breast Reconstruction: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis.
低分子量肝素与机械性血栓预防在即刻植入式乳房重建中的疗效与安全性:一项回顾性对比分析
In Vivo. 2025 Jan-Feb;39(1):318-324. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13830.
4
Independent Predictors of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients Undergoing Reconstructive Breast Cancer Surgery.接受乳腺癌重建手术患者静脉血栓栓塞的独立预测因素
Plast Surg (Oakv). 2021 Aug;29(3):160-168. doi: 10.1177/2292550320967397. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
5
A Comparison of Common Plastic Surgery Operations Using the NSQIP and TOPS Databases.使用NSQIP和TOPS数据库对常见整形手术进行的比较。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 May 27;8(5):e2841. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002841. eCollection 2020 May.
6
Enhanced Recovery for Breast Reconstruction Surgery.乳腺癌重建手术的加速康复。
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2019 Mar 14;23(4):27. doi: 10.1007/s11916-019-0761-5.
7
The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 30-Day Challenge: Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Reporting Reliability.国家外科质量改进计划30天挑战:显微外科乳房重建结果报告的可靠性
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Mar 6;6(3):e1643. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001643. eCollection 2018 Mar.
8
Bilateral mastectomies: can a co-surgeon technique offer improvements over the single-surgeon method?双侧乳房切除术:辅助手术医师技术是否优于单手术医师方法?
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Aug;170(3):641-646. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-4794-y. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
9
The Impact of the Cosurgeon Model on Bilateral Autologous Breast Reconstruction.协同外科医生模式对双侧自体乳房重建的影响。
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2017 Nov;33(9):624-629. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1604106. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
10
Consensus Review of Optimal Perioperative Care in Breast Reconstruction: Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations.乳房重建最佳围手术期护理的共识性综述:术后加速康复(ERAS)学会推荐意见
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 May;139(5):1056e-1071e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003242.