• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

协同外科医生模式对双侧自体乳房重建的影响。

The Impact of the Cosurgeon Model on Bilateral Autologous Breast Reconstruction.

作者信息

Razdan Shantanu N, Panchal Hina J, Hespe Geoffrey E, Disa Joseph J, McCarthy Colleen M, Allen Robert J, Dayan Joseph H, Pusic Andrea, Mehrara Babak, Cordeiro Peter G, Matros Evan

机构信息

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.

出版信息

J Reconstr Microsurg. 2017 Nov;33(9):624-629. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1604106. Epub 2017 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1055/s-0037-1604106
PMID:28759936
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9066824/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Microsurgical breast reconstructions (MBRs) are time and labor intensive procedures. To circumvent these barriers, plastic surgeons have started working together as cosurgeons (CSs). This study aims to evaluate the impact of the CS model (CSM) specifically on bilateral MBR. The hypothesis is that CS procedures reduce operative time and surgical complications.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a single institutional retrospective cohort study, which included all consecutive patients who underwent bilateral MBR from 2014 to 2016. Patients were grouped into single surgeon (SS) or CSs based on the number of the attending plastic surgeons present. Demographic and clinical characteristics including age, body mass index, smoking, American Society of Anesthesiologist class, radiation, and the timing of the reconstruction were assessed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for outcomes including operative time and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Of the 136 patients included in the study, 41% had breast reconstruction performed by CSs, whereas 59% had a SS. Sociodemographic features were evenly distributed with the exception of a greater number of delayed reconstructions in the SS group (33 vs. 13%; <0.01). Pedicle TRAMS (transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps) were performed in 5 versus 0% of SS versus CS cases, respectively. Rates of major (4 vs. 16%) and minor (11 vs. 24%) complications were significantly lower in CS procedures. Multivariate analyses demonstrated CS operations required significantly shorter operative time by 73 minutes ( <0.001), and trended toward a reduced postoperative complication rate ( 0.07).

CONCLUSION

The CSM is associated with improved operative efficiency for bilateral MBR. Further evaluation of the CSM may prove useful in other surgical disciplines with time and labor intense procedures.

摘要

背景

显微外科乳房重建术(MBR)是耗时且费力的手术。为了克服这些障碍,整形外科医生开始作为联合外科医生(CS)共同开展手术。本研究旨在评估联合外科医生模式(CSM)对双侧MBR的具体影响。假设是联合外科医生手术可减少手术时间和手术并发症。

研究设计

这是一项单机构回顾性队列研究,纳入了2014年至2016年期间所有连续接受双侧MBR的患者。根据主刀整形外科医生的数量,将患者分为单外科医生(SS)组或联合外科医生组。评估了人口统计学和临床特征,包括年龄、体重指数、吸烟情况、美国麻醉医师协会分级、放疗以及重建时间。对包括手术时间和术后并发症在内的结果进行了单因素和多因素分析。

结果

在纳入研究的136例患者中,41%接受了联合外科医生手术,而59%接受了单外科医生手术。社会人口学特征分布均匀,但单外科医生组延迟重建的患者数量更多(33%对13%;<0.01)。分别有5%和0%的单外科医生组和联合外科医生组患者接受了带蒂腹直肌肌皮瓣(TRAM)手术。联合外科医生手术的严重(4%对16%)和轻微(11%对24%)并发症发生率显著更低。多因素分析表明,联合外科医生手术所需的手术时间显著缩短73分钟(<0.001),且术后并发症发生率有降低趋势(P = 0.07)。

结论

CSM与双侧MBR手术效率的提高相关。对CSM的进一步评估可能在其他耗时且费力的外科领域中证明是有用的。

相似文献

1
The Impact of the Cosurgeon Model on Bilateral Autologous Breast Reconstruction.协同外科医生模式对双侧自体乳房重建的影响。
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2017 Nov;33(9):624-629. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1604106. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
2
Autologous options for postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a comparison of outcomes based on the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.乳腺癌根治术后自体乳房重建的选择:基于美国外科医师学会国家手术质量改进计划的结果比较。
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Feb;216(2):229-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.11.003. Epub 2012 Dec 2.
3
Predictors of readmission after breast reconstruction: a multi-institutional analysis of 5012 patients.乳房重建术后再入院的预测因素:对5012例患者的多机构分析
Ann Plast Surg. 2013 Oct;71(4):335-41. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3182a0df25.
4
Microvascular Breast Reconstruction in the Era of Value-Based Care: Use of a Cosurgeon Is Associated with Reduced Costs, Improved Outcomes, and Added Value.基于价值医疗时代的微血管乳房重建:联合整形外科医生可降低成本、改善预后并增加价值。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 Feb 1;149(2):338-348. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008715.
5
Does Pregnancy Predict Incisional Hernia Repair after Abdominally Based Autologous Breast Reconstruction? A Retrospective Review of 890 Free Flaps.妊娠是否可预测腹直肌肌皮瓣乳房重建术后的切口疝?890 例游离皮瓣的回顾性研究
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 May;145(5):909e-916e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006723.
6
The Effect of Resident Involvement on Postoperative Short-Term Surgical Outcomes in Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Study of 24,005 Patients.住院医师参与对即刻乳房重建术后短期手术结局的影响:一项针对24005例患者的国家外科质量改进计划研究
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Jun;139(6):1325-1334. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003346.
7
Perforator flap breast reconstruction after unsatisfactory implant reconstruction.不满意的植入物重建术后的穿支皮瓣乳房重建。
Ann Plast Surg. 2011 May;66(5):513-7. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3182012597.
8
Outcomes of delayed abdominal-based autologous reconstruction versus latissimus dorsi flap plus implant reconstruction in previously irradiated patients.延迟腹部自体组织重建与背阔肌肌皮瓣加植入物重建用于既往接受过放疗患者的效果比较
Ann Plast Surg. 2012 Oct;69(4):380-2. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31824b3d6b.
9
Cost and outcome analysis of breast reconstruction paradigm shift.乳房重建模式转变的成本与结果分析
Ann Plast Surg. 2014 Aug;73(2):141-9. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e318276d979.
10
Comparing thirty-day outcomes in prosthetic and autologous breast reconstruction: a multivariate analysis of 13,082 patients?比较假体和自体乳房重建 30 天的结果:13082 例患者的多变量分析
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013 Jul;66(7):917-25. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2013.03.009. Epub 2013 Apr 4.

引用本文的文献

1
A Multi-institutional Analysis of a Textbook Outcome Among Patients Undergoing Microvascular Breast Reconstruction.多机构分析接受微血管乳房重建术患者的教科书式结局。
Ann Plast Surg. 2024 Jun 1;92(6S Suppl 4):S453-S460. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003950.
2
Simultaneous Co-surgeon Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) Flap Breast Reconstructions: Feasibility and Clinical Outcomes.同期双外科医师施行腹壁下动脉穿支(DIEP)皮瓣乳房重建术:可行性和临床结果。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Aug;31(8):5409-5416. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15266-0. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
3
The Value of a Co-surgeon in Microvascular Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.微血管乳房重建中共同外科医生的价值:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Feb 5;12(2):e5624. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005624. eCollection 2024 Feb.
4
How to Start and Build a Practice in Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction: Success and Sustainability in a Private Practice Setting.如何开展和建立显微外科乳房重建业务:私人执业环境下的成功与可持续发展
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Feb 5;12(2):e5267. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005267. eCollection 2024 Feb.
5
Building Complex Autologous Breast Reconstruction Program: A Preliminary Experience.构建复杂自体乳房重建项目:初步经验
J Clin Med. 2023 Oct 27;12(21):6810. doi: 10.3390/jcm12216810.
6
The impact of co-surgeons on complication rates and healthcare cost in patients undergoing microsurgical breast reconstruction: analysis of 8680 patients.共同手术医生对接受显微乳房重建术患者的并发症发生率和医疗成本的影响:8680 例患者分析。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Nov;184(2):345-356. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05845-6. Epub 2020 Aug 16.
7
Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: Exploring Plastic Surgeon Practice Patterns and Perspectives.乳腺癌根治术后乳房再造:探索整形医师的实践模式和观点。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Apr;145(4):865-876. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006627.
8
Bilateral mastectomies: can a co-surgeon technique offer improvements over the single-surgeon method?双侧乳房切除术:辅助手术医师技术是否优于单手术医师方法?
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Aug;170(3):641-646. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-4794-y. Epub 2018 Apr 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of Continuous Two-Team Approach in Autologous Breast Reconstruction.连续双组方法在自体乳房重建中的影响
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2017 May;33(4):298-304. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1598199. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
2
The Impact of Two Operating Surgeons on Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction.两位手术医生对显微外科乳房重建的影响。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Feb;139(2):277-284. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002946.
3
The Plastic Surgeon at Work and Play: Surgeon Health, Practice Stress, and Work-Home Balance.工作与生活中的整形外科医生:外科医生的健康、执业压力与工作-家庭平衡
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016 Oct 5;4(10):e1081. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001081. eCollection 2016 Oct.
4
A Comparison of Psychological Response, Body Image, Sexuality, and Quality of Life between Immediate and Delayed Autologous Tissue Breast Reconstruction: A Prospective Long-Term Outcome Study.即刻与延迟自体组织乳房重建的心理反应、身体意象、性功能及生活质量比较:一项前瞻性长期结局研究。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Oct;138(4):772-780. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002536.
5
Operative Duration and Risk of Surgical Site Infection in Neurosurgery.神经外科手术的手术时长与手术部位感染风险
World Neurosurg. 2016 Oct;94:551-555.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.07.077. Epub 2016 Jul 30.
6
Surgeon Burnout: A Systematic Review.外科医生职业倦怠:一项系统综述。
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Jun;222(6):1230-1239. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.03.022. Epub 2016 Mar 25.
7
Benefits of two or more senior microsurgeons operating simultaneously in microsurgical breast reconstruction: Experience in a swedish medical center.两名或更多资深显微外科医生同时进行显微外科乳房重建的益处:瑞典一家医疗中心的经验
Microsurgery. 2017 Jul;37(5):416-420. doi: 10.1002/micr.30039. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
8
Does "Two is Better Than One" Apply to Surgeons? Comparing Single-Surgeon Versus Co-surgeon Bilateral Mastectomies.“两人比一人强”适用于外科医生吗?单主刀与双主刀双侧乳房切除术的比较。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Apr;23(4):1111-6. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4956-7. Epub 2015 Oct 29.
9
National trends and complication rates after bilateral mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction from 2005 to 2012.2005年至2012年双侧乳房切除术及即刻乳房重建术后的全国趋势和并发症发生率
Am J Surg. 2015 Sep;210(3):512-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.03.019. Epub 2015 May 14.
10
Bilateral Mastectomy versus Breast-Conserving Surgery for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: The Role of Breast Reconstruction.早期乳腺癌的双侧乳房切除术与保乳手术:乳房重建的作用
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Jun;135(6):1518-1526. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001276.