Adida Marc, Jollant Fabrice, Clark Luke, Guillaume Sebastien, Goodwin Guy M, Azorin Jean-Michel, Courtet Philippe
Timone Neurosciences Institute (INT), UMR 7289 CNRS-AMU, Timone Health Campus, Marseille, France; Sainte Marguerite Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Mediterranean University, Marseille, France.
McGill University, Mental Health University Institute Douglas & McGill Group for Suicide Studies, Montréal Québec, Canada.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2015 Jun;25(6):788-97. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.03.003. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
Bipolar disorder is associated with impaired decision-making. Little is known about how treatment, especially lithium, influences decision-making abilities in bipolar patients when euthymic. We aimed at testing for an association between lithium medication and decision-making performance in remitted bipolar patients. Decision-making was measured using the Iowa Gambling Task in 3 groups of subjects: 34 and 56 euthymic outpatients with bipolar disorder, treated with lithium (monotherapy and lithium combined with anticonvulsant or antipsychotic) and without lithium (anticonvulsant, antipsychotic and combination treatment), respectively, and 152 matched healthy controls. Performance was compared between the 3 groups. In the 90 euthymic patients, the relationship between different sociodemographic and clinical variables and decision-making was assessed by stepwise multivariate regression analysis. Euthymic patients with lithium (p=0.007) and healthy controls (p=0.001) selected significantly more cards from the safe decks than euthymic patients without lithium, with no significant difference between euthymic patients with lithium and healthy controls (p=0.9). In the 90 euthymic patients, the stepwise linear multivariate regression revealed that decision-making was significantly predicted (p<0.001) by lithium dose, level of education and no family history of bipolar disorder (all p≤0.01). Because medication was not randomized, it was not possible to discriminate the effect of different medications. Lithium medication might be associated with better decision-making in remitted bipolar patients. A randomized trial is required to test for the hypothesis that lithium, but not other mood stabilizers, may specifically improve decision-making abilities in bipolar disorder.
双相情感障碍与决策能力受损有关。对于治疗尤其是锂盐如何影响双相情感障碍患者在病情缓解期的决策能力,我们知之甚少。我们旨在测试锂盐治疗与双相情感障碍缓解期患者决策表现之间的关联。使用爱荷华赌博任务对三组受试者的决策能力进行测量:分别为34名和56名双相情感障碍病情缓解期的门诊患者,其中一组接受锂盐治疗(单药治疗以及锂盐与抗惊厥药或抗精神病药联合治疗),另一组未接受锂盐治疗(接受抗惊厥药、抗精神病药及联合治疗),还有152名匹配的健康对照者。比较了三组之间的表现。在90名病情缓解期的患者中,通过逐步多元回归分析评估了不同社会人口统计学和临床变量与决策能力之间的关系。接受锂盐治疗的病情缓解期患者(p = 0.007)和健康对照者(p = 0.001)从安全牌组中选择的牌显著多于未接受锂盐治疗的病情缓解期患者,接受锂盐治疗的病情缓解期患者与健康对照者之间无显著差异(p = 0.9)。在90名病情缓解期的患者中,逐步线性多元回归显示,锂盐剂量、受教育程度和无双相情感障碍家族史显著预测了决策能力(p < 0.001,所有p≤0.01)。由于药物治疗并非随机分配,因此无法区分不同药物的效果。锂盐治疗可能与双相情感障碍缓解期患者更好的决策能力有关。需要进行一项随机试验来检验锂盐而非其他心境稳定剂可能特异性改善双相情感障碍患者决策能力这一假设。