Langereis Margreet, Vermeulen Anneke
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Hearing and Implants, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Hearing and Implants, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Jun;79(6):834-839. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.03.014. Epub 2015 Mar 23.
This study aimed to evaluate the long term effects of CI on auditory, language, educational and social-emotional development of deaf children in different educational-communicative settings.
The outcomes of 58 children with profound hearing loss and normal non-verbal cognition, after 60 months of CI use have been analyzed. At testing the children were enrolled in three different educational settings; in mainstream education, where spoken language is used or in hard-of-hearing education where sign supported spoken language is used and in bilingual deaf education, with Sign Language of the Netherlands and Sign Supported Dutch. Children were assessed on auditory speech perception, receptive language, educational attainment and wellbeing.
Auditory speech perception of children with CI in mainstream education enable them to acquire language and educational levels that are comparable to those of their normal hearing peers. Although the children in mainstream and hard-of-hearing settings show similar speech perception abilities, language development in children in hard-of-hearing settings lags significantly behind. Speech perception, language and educational attainments of children in deaf education remained extremely poor. Furthermore more children in mainstream and hard-of-hearing environments are resilient than in deaf educational settings. Regression analyses showed an important influence of educational setting.
Children with CI who are placed in early intervention environments that facilitate auditory development are able to achieve good auditory speech perception, language and educational levels on the long term. Most parents of these children report no social-emotional concerns.
本研究旨在评估人工耳蜗植入(CI)对处于不同教育交流环境中的失聪儿童的听觉、语言、教育和社会情感发展的长期影响。
分析了58名重度听力损失且非语言认知正常的儿童在使用人工耳蜗60个月后的结果。测试时,这些儿童被纳入三种不同的教育环境;在使用口语的主流教育环境中,或在使用手语辅助口语的重听教育环境中,以及在使用荷兰手语和手语辅助荷兰语的双语失聪教育环境中。对儿童进行了听觉言语感知、接受性语言、学业成绩和幸福感方面的评估。
在主流教育环境中使用人工耳蜗的儿童的听觉言语感知能力使他们能够获得与听力正常的同龄人相当的语言和教育水平。尽管主流教育环境和重听教育环境中的儿童表现出相似的言语感知能力,但重听教育环境中的儿童的语言发展明显滞后。失聪教育环境中的儿童的言语感知、语言和学业成绩仍然极其糟糕。此外,主流教育环境和重听教育环境中的儿童比失聪教育环境中的儿童更有适应能力。回归分析显示教育环境有重要影响。
处于有助于听觉发展的早期干预环境中的人工耳蜗植入儿童能够长期获得良好的听觉言语感知、语言和教育水平。这些儿童的大多数家长表示没有社会情感方面的担忧。