Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California; Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Jun 1;92(2):376-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.01.029. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
Relevant clinical data are needed given the increasing national interest in charged particle radiation therapy (CPT) programs. Here we report long-term outcomes from the only randomized, stratified trial comparing CPT with iodine-125 plaque therapy for choroidal and ciliary body melanoma.
From 1985 to 1991, 184 patients met eligibility criteria and were randomized to receive particle (86 patients) or plaque therapy (98 patients). Patients were stratified by tumor diameter, thickness, distance to disc/fovea, anterior extension, and visual acuity. Tumors close to the optic disc were included. Local tumor control, as well as eye preservation, metastases due to melanoma, and survival were evaluated.
Median follow-up times for particle and plaque arm patients were 14.6 years and 12.3 years, respectively (P=.22), and for those alive at last follow-up, 18.5 and 16.5 years, respectively (P=.81). Local control (LC) for particle versus plaque treatment was 100% versus 84% at 5 years, and 98% versus 79% at 12 years, respectively (log rank: P=.0006). If patients with tumors close to the disc (<2 mm) were excluded, CPT still resulted in significantly improved LC: 100% versus 90% at 5 years and 98% versus 86% at 12 years, respectively (log rank: P=.048). Enucleation rate was lower after CPT: 11% versus 22% at 5 years and 17% versus 37% at 12 years, respectively (log rank: P=.01). Using Cox regression model, likelihood ratio test, treatment was the most important predictor of LC (P=.0002) and eye preservation (P=.01). CPT was a significant predictor of prolonged disease-free survival (log rank: P=.001).
Particle therapy resulted in significantly improved local control, eye preservation, and disease-free survival as confirmed by long-term outcomes from the only randomized study available to date comparing radiation modalities in choroidal and ciliary body melanoma.
鉴于国家对带电粒子放射治疗(CPT)项目的兴趣日益浓厚,因此需要相关的临床数据。在此,我们报告了唯一一项比较 CPT 与碘 125 贴敷治疗脉络膜和睫状体黑色素瘤的随机、分层试验的长期结果。
1985 年至 1991 年,184 名患者符合入选标准,并被随机分配接受粒子(86 例)或贴敷(98 例)治疗。患者按肿瘤直径、厚度、距视盘/黄斑的距离、前伸和视力进行分层。包括靠近视盘的肿瘤。评估局部肿瘤控制、眼球保留、黑色素瘤转移和生存情况。
粒子和贴敷臂患者的中位随访时间分别为 14.6 年和 12.3 年(P=.22),截至最后一次随访时仍存活的患者分别为 18.5 年和 16.5 年(P=.81)。粒子治疗与贴敷治疗的局部控制率(LC)分别为 5 年时 100%比 84%,12 年时 98%比 79%(对数秩检验:P=.0006)。如果排除靠近视盘(<2mm)的肿瘤患者,CPT 仍可显著提高 LC:5 年时分别为 100%和 90%,12 年时分别为 98%和 86%(对数秩检验:P=.048)。CPT 后眼球摘除率较低:5 年时分别为 11%和 22%,12 年时分别为 17%和 37%(对数秩检验:P=.01)。使用 Cox 回归模型、似然比检验,治疗是 LC(P=.0002)和眼球保留(P=.01)的最重要预测因素。CPT 是无病生存时间延长的显著预测因素(对数秩检验:P=.001)。
粒子治疗可显著提高局部控制率、眼球保留率和无病生存率,这是迄今为止唯一一项比较脉络膜和睫状体黑色素瘤放射治疗方式的随机研究的长期结果证实的。