Yoon Richard S, Bible Jesse, Marcus Matthew S, Donegan Derek J, Bergmann Karl A, Siebler Justin C, Mir Hassan R, Liporace Frank A
Division of Orthopaedic Trauma, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY 10003, United States.
Division of Orthopaedic Trauma, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, United States.
Injury. 2015;46(6):1097-101. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.03.019. Epub 2015 Mar 26.
Concomitant plate fixation as an adjunct to intramedullary nailing (IMN) of proximal third tibia fractures is a proven technique. Benefits include its role as a minimally invasive reduction aid, allowing for minimal soft tissue disruption. Expanding its indications as adjunct fixation to IMN throughout the tibia, we aimed to study outcomes in a multi-centre initiative.
From May 1999 to March 2010, a total of 1302 operatively treated tibial fractures (including plateau and pilon fractures) with complete medical records were identified for review. Of these, 376 cases were treated via IMN, of which 30 cases were treated via combined IMN and plating, meeting inclusion criteria. Primary outcome was union rates, time to union, and complication rates. Secondary outcomes included mean alignment from the immediate postoperative period to the time of final follow-up.
Twenty-seven out of 30 patients were available for follow-up. Twenty-five (93%) achieved bony union; the remaining two patients, sustained Type IIIA and B injuries respectively, went onto non-union secondary to deep infection and required multiple re-operations before achieving ultimate union. Mean time at final follow-up was 20 ± 10 months, 96% were ambulatory at full weight bearing status with no malunions. No significant changes in alignment in either the coronal or sagittal planes were noted at time of final follow-up.
Combined IMN and plate fixation is a reliable tool not only in the treatment of fractures of the proximal tibia, but also for those fractures in the diaphysis and segmental fractures with proximal and/or distal metadiaphyseal extension with consistent ability to maintain high union rates and maintained alignment. However, longer-term follow-up and prospective trials will be necessary before coming to a definitive conclusion.
对于胫骨近端三分之一骨折,采用钢板固定辅助髓内钉固定(IMN)是一种已被证实的技术。其优点包括作为一种微创复位辅助手段,可使软组织破坏降至最低。为了将其作为IMN在整个胫骨的辅助固定适应证进行扩展,我们旨在通过一项多中心研究来探讨其疗效。
从1999年5月至2010年3月,共确定了1302例有完整病历的接受手术治疗的胫骨骨折(包括平台骨折和Pilon骨折)进行回顾性研究。其中,376例采用IMN治疗,其中30例采用IMN联合钢板固定治疗,符合纳入标准。主要结局指标为愈合率、愈合时间和并发症发生率。次要结局指标包括从术后即刻至最终随访时的平均对线情况。
30例患者中有27例可供随访。25例(93%)实现了骨愈合;其余2例患者分别为ⅢA型和B型损伤,因深部感染导致骨不连,在最终实现愈合之前需要多次再次手术。最终随访时的平均时间为20±10个月,96%的患者在完全负重状态下可行走,无畸形愈合。在最终随访时,冠状面或矢状面的对线均未发现明显变化。
IMN联合钢板固定不仅是治疗胫骨近端骨折的可靠工具,对于骨干骨折以及伴有近端和/或远端干骺端延伸的节段性骨折,也能持续保持高愈合率和良好对线。然而,在得出明确结论之前,还需要进行长期随访和前瞻性试验。