Suppr超能文献

急性胰腺炎:病情严重程度如何评估?

Acute Pancreatitis: What's the Score?

作者信息

Kuo Dick C, Rider Ashley C, Estrada Paul, Kim Daniel, Pillow Malford T

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Section of Emergency Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.

出版信息

J Emerg Med. 2015 Jun;48(6):762-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.02.018. Epub 2015 Apr 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common presentation in the emergency department (ED). Severity of pancreatitis is an important consideration for ED clinicians making admission judgments. Validated scoring systems can be a helpful tool in this process.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this review is to give a general outline on the subject of AP and compare different criteria used to predict severity of disease for use in the ED.

DISCUSSION

This review updates the classifications and scoring systems for AP and the relevant parameters of each. This article assesses past and current scoring systems for AP, including Ranson criteria, Glasgow criteria, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), computed tomography imaging scoring systems, Bedside Index of Severity in Acute Pancreatitis (BISAP) score, Panc 3, Harmless Acute Pancreatitis Score (HAPS), and the Japanese Severity Score. This article also describes the potential use of single variable predictors. Finally, this article discusses risk factors for early readmission, an outcome pertinent to emergency physicians. These parameters may be used to risk-stratify patients presenting to the ED into mild, moderate, and severe pancreatitis for determination of appropriate disposition.

CONCLUSION

Rapid, reliable, and validated means of predicting patient outcome from rapid clinical assessment are of value to the emergency physician. Scoring systems such as BISAP, HAPS, and single-variable predictors may assist in decision-making due to their simplicity of use and applicability within the first 24 h.

摘要

背景

急性胰腺炎(AP)是急诊科常见的病症。胰腺炎的严重程度是急诊科医生做出入院判断时的重要考量因素。经过验证的评分系统在此过程中可能是一个有用的工具。

目的

本综述的目的是对AP主题进行总体概述,并比较用于预测急诊科疾病严重程度的不同标准。

讨论

本综述更新了AP的分类和评分系统以及各自的相关参数。本文评估了过去和当前用于AP的评分系统,包括兰森标准、格拉斯哥标准、急性生理与慢性健康状况评估II(APACHE II)、计算机断层扫描成像评分系统、急性胰腺炎床边严重程度指数(BISAP)评分、Panc 3、无害急性胰腺炎评分(HAPS)以及日本严重程度评分。本文还描述了单变量预测指标的潜在用途。最后,本文讨论了早期再入院的危险因素,这是与急诊医生相关的一个结果。这些参数可用于将急诊科就诊的患者按轻度、中度和重度胰腺炎进行风险分层,以确定合适的处置方式。

结论

通过快速临床评估快速、可靠且经过验证的预测患者预后的方法对急诊医生具有价值。诸如BISAP、HAPS等评分系统以及单变量预测指标因其使用简便且在前24小时内具有适用性,可能有助于决策制定。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验