• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A Simple Prediction Score for Diagnosis of Acute Pancreatitis.简单的急性胰腺炎诊断预测评分。
In Vivo. 2022 Sep-Oct;36(5):2287-2296. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12958.
2
A Diagnostic Score (DS) in the Difficult Diagnosis of Non-specific Abdominal Pain (NSAP).一种用于诊断非特异性腹痛(NSAP)的困难诊断的诊断评分(DS)。
In Vivo. 2021 Sep-Oct;35(5):2729-2738. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12557.
3
History-taking, Clinical Signs, Tests and Scores for Detection of Non-organic Dyspepsia (NOD) Among Patients With Acute Abdominal Pain (AAP).急性腹痛(AAP)患者中用于检测非器质性消化不良(NOD)的病史采集、临床体征、检查及评分
Cancer Diagn Progn. 2021 Jul 3;1(4):265-274. doi: 10.21873/cdp.10034. eCollection 2021 Sep-Oct.
4
Accuracy of Prediction Models in Diagnosis of Acute Diverticulitis.预测模型在急性憩室炎诊断中的准确性。
In Vivo. 2023 Nov-Dec;37(6):2597-2608. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13367.
5
A Diagnostic Score for Acute Small Bowel Obstruction.急性小肠梗阻的诊断评分。
Anticancer Res. 2021 Apr;41(4):1959-1970. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.14963.
6
A Diagnostic Score (DS) Is a Powerful Tool in Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis in Elderly Patients With Acute Abdominal Pain.诊断评分(DS)是诊断老年腹痛患者急性阑尾炎的有力工具。
Anticancer Res. 2021 Mar;41(3):1459-1469. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.14904.
7
A Diagnostic Score for Reliable Confirmation of Acute Renal Colic Among Patients With Acute Abdominal Pain.用于可靠确认急性腹痛患者急性肾绞痛的诊断评分。
Anticancer Res. 2021 Jun;41(6):3045-3054. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.15087.
8
Pediatric Acute Appendicitis Score in Children With Acute Abdominal Pain (AAP).儿童急性腹痛的儿科急性阑尾炎评分(AAP)。
Anticancer Res. 2021 Jan;41(1):297-306. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.14776.
9
Performance of a Diagnostic Score in Confirming Acute Cholecystitis Among Patients With Acute Abdominal Pain.诊断评分在确认急性腹痛患者急性胆囊炎中的表现。
Anticancer Res. 2020 Dec;40(12):6947-6956. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.14719. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
10
Comparison of Ranson, APACHE II and APACHE III scoring systems in acute pancreatitis.兰森、急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)和急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统III(APACHE III)在急性胰腺炎中的比较。
Pancreas. 2002 Nov;25(4):331-5. doi: 10.1097/00006676-200211000-00002.

引用本文的文献

1
Accuracy of Prediction Models in Diagnosis of Acute Diverticulitis.预测模型在急性憩室炎诊断中的准确性。
In Vivo. 2023 Nov-Dec;37(6):2597-2608. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13367.

本文引用的文献

1
Development of a Score for Predicting Severe Acute Pancreatitis at Admission.入院时预测重症急性胰腺炎的评分的制定。
Pancreas. 2022 Feb 1;51(2):128-134. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001984.
2
Acute Pancreatitis: A Review.急性胰腺炎:综述。
JAMA. 2021 Jan 26;325(4):382-390. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.20317.
3
Performance of a Diagnostic Score in Confirming Acute Cholecystitis Among Patients With Acute Abdominal Pain.诊断评分在确认急性腹痛患者急性胆囊炎中的表现。
Anticancer Res. 2020 Dec;40(12):6947-6956. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.14719. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
4
Gender-specific Performance of a Diagnostic Score in Acute Appendicitis.诊断评分在急性阑尾炎中的性别特异性表现。
In Vivo. 2020 Nov-Dec;34(6):3687-3703. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12217.
5
Leucocyte Count Does Not Improve the Diagnostic Performance of a Diagnostic Score (DS) in Distinguishing Acute Appendicitis (AA) from Nonspecific Abdominal Pain (NSAP).白细胞计数不能提高诊断评分(DS)鉴别急性阑尾炎(AA)与非特异性腹痛(NSAP)的诊断性能。
In Vivo. 2020 Nov-Dec;34(6):3327-3339. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12171.
6
Acute pancreatitis.急性胰腺炎。
Lancet. 2020 Sep 5;396(10252):726-734. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31310-6.
7
2019 WSES guidelines for the management of severe acute pancreatitis.2019 WSES 急性胰腺炎严重程度分级与管理指南。
World J Emerg Surg. 2019 Jun 13;14:27. doi: 10.1186/s13017-019-0247-0. eCollection 2019.
8
Acute Pancreatitis: What's the Score?急性胰腺炎:病情严重程度如何评估?
J Emerg Med. 2015 Jun;48(6):762-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.02.018. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
9
American College of Gastroenterology guideline: management of acute pancreatitis.美国胃肠病学会指南:急性胰腺炎的管理。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Sep;108(9):1400-15; 1416. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.218. Epub 2013 Jul 30.
10
The epidemiology of pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer.胰腺炎和胰腺癌的流行病学。
Gastroenterology. 2013 Jun;144(6):1252-61. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.01.068.

简单的急性胰腺炎诊断预测评分。

A Simple Prediction Score for Diagnosis of Acute Pancreatitis.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Kuopio University Hospital and University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland;

Department of Surgery, Kuopio University Hospital and University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.

出版信息

In Vivo. 2022 Sep-Oct;36(5):2287-2296. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12958.

DOI:10.21873/invivo.12958
PMID:36099125
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9463918/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: The diagnostic accuracy (DA) for patients with acute pancreatitis (AcPa) has been rarely evaluated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In the AcPa study group, there were 22 patients versus 1,311 patients in the non-AcPa group. The clinical history-taking variables (CHT) (n=22), clinical signs & tests details (CST) (n=14), and laboratory analyses (n=3) were recorded in each patient. Meta-analytical techniques were used to detect the summary sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) estimates for each data set; CHT, CST, and diagnostic scores (DS).

RESULTS

In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the area under curve (AUC) values for i) CHT, ii) CST, and iii) DS were as follows: i) AUC=0.640 (95%CI=0.550-0.730); ii) AUC=0.588 (95%CI=0.520-0.656), and iii) AUC=0.943 (95%CI=0.910-0.976). The differences between these AUC values (roccomp analysis) are as follows: i) versus ii) p=0.155; i) versus iii) p<0.0001; ii) versus iii) p<0.0001.

CONCLUSION

The new DS introduced in this study proved to be far superior to both symptoms and signs & tests in its DA for AcPa, as demonstrated by HSROC analysis.

摘要

背景/目的:急性胰腺炎(AcPa)患者的诊断准确性(DA)很少得到评估。

患者和方法

在 AcPa 研究组中,有 22 例患者,而非 AcPa 组有 1311 例患者。每位患者记录了临床病史采集变量(CHT)(n=22)、临床体征和检查细节(CST)(n=14)和实验室分析(n=3)。使用荟萃分析技术检测每个数据集的汇总敏感性(Se)和特异性(Sp)估计值;CHT、CST 和诊断评分(DS)。

结果

在受试者工作特征(ROC)分析中,i)CHT、ii)CST 和 iii)DS 的曲线下面积(AUC)值如下:i)AUC=0.640(95%CI=0.550-0.730);ii)AUC=0.588(95%CI=0.520-0.656),iii)AUC=0.943(95%CI=0.910-0.976)。这些 AUC 值之间的差异(roccomp 分析)如下:i)与 ii)p=0.155;i)与 iii)p<0.0001;ii)与 iii)p<0.0001。

结论

本研究中引入的新 DS 在其对 AcPa 的 DA 方面证明远优于症状和体征与检查,这通过 HSROC 分析得到了证明。