Moeller Joensson Iben, Hagstroem Soren, Siggaard Charlotte, Bower Wendy, Djurhuus Jens Christian, Krogh Klaus
*Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University†Department of Pediatrics, Aarhus University Hospital‡Neurogastroenterology Unit, Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2015 Jul;61(1):80-84. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000000802.
Neurostimulation is increasingly used in treating bladder and bowel dysfunction, but its effect on rectal motility is obscure. The aim of the study was to evaluate the acute effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on rectal motility in children with overactive bladder (OAB).
In this double-blind placebo-controlled study in 20 children with OAB (mean age 8.6 ± 1.8 years; 7 girls), 48-hour urodynamic monitoring including rectal manometry was performed. After 24-hours of baseline investigation without stimulation the children were randomised to either active TENS (n = 10) or placebo (n = 10). Surface electrodes were placed over the sacral bone. The exterior of active and placebo stimulators was identical. Starting in the morning, the children received either continuous TENS stimulation or placebo until bedtime. Rectal contractions were defined as pressure runs exceeding 5 cm H2O and lasting ≥3 minutes.
At baseline there was no significant difference in proportion of time with rectal contractions in the 2 groups (TENS group median 31% [range 12%-66%] vs placebo group median 31% [range 10%-66%]; P = 0.75); however, on the day of stimulation there was more time with rectal contractions in the group receiving TENS (median 51% [range 25%-78%]) compared with placebo (median 32% [range 4%-68%]; P = 0.02). Also, there was an increase in time with rectal contractions in the TENS group (P = 0.007) but not in the placebo group (P = 0.39). The night after the TENS was disabled, rectal activity in both groups returned to baseline level.
TENS acutely increases time with rectal contractions in children undergoing urodynamic investigation. The effect disappears when the stimulator is turned off.
神经刺激在膀胱和肠道功能障碍治疗中的应用日益广泛,但其对直肠动力的影响尚不明确。本研究旨在评估经皮电神经刺激(TENS)对膀胱过度活动症(OAB)患儿直肠动力的急性影响。
在这项针对20例OAB患儿(平均年龄8.6±1.8岁;7名女孩)的双盲安慰剂对照研究中,进行了包括直肠测压在内的48小时尿动力学监测。在无刺激的24小时基线调查后,将患儿随机分为主动TENS组(n = 10)和安慰剂组(n = 10)。将表面电极置于骶骨上方。主动刺激器和安慰剂刺激器的外观相同。从早晨开始,患儿接受持续TENS刺激或安慰剂直至就寝时间。直肠收缩定义为压力上升超过5 cm H2O且持续≥3分钟。
基线时,两组直肠收缩时间比例无显著差异(TENS组中位数31%[范围12%-66%],安慰剂组中位数31%[范围10%-66%];P = 0.75);然而,在刺激当天,接受TENS组的直肠收缩时间比安慰剂组更多(中位数51%[范围25%-78%])(中位数32%[范围4%-68%];P = 0.02)。此外,TENS组直肠收缩时间增加(P = 0.007),而安慰剂组未增加(P = 0.39)。停用TENS后的当晚,两组的直肠活动均恢复至基线水平。
TENS可使接受尿动力学检查的患儿直肠收缩时间急性增加。刺激器关闭后,该效应消失。