• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

质量改进措施对变应原免疫治疗实施的影响:2 年随访。

Impact of quality improvement measures on the delivery of allergy immunotherapy: a 2-year follow-up.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2015 Jun;5(6):513-6. doi: 10.1002/alr.21487. Epub 2015 Apr 6.

DOI:10.1002/alr.21487
PMID:25845709
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Anaphylaxis is the most serious potential complication from allergy treatment with subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT). Quality measures were developed with the goal to decrease the incidence of complications resulting from SCIT and improve the safety of care provided.

METHODS

The incidence and characteristics of anaphylaxis episodes resulting from SCIT was measured between 2008 and 2012 prior to implementation of quality measures including vial verification, vial testing, and standardized training across 6 allergy delivery sites. Errors and anaphylaxis rates were then tracked prospectively over a 2-year period after implementation of these process measures.

RESULTS

From 2008 to 2012 there were 9 episodes of anaphylaxis or 0.02% of injections/year. Eight patients had sufficient information from which to derive meaningful data. Patient identification error led to anaphylaxis in 2 patients, dosing error in 2, and compounding error in 1 patient. In 2 patients, anaphylaxis occurred with advancement during pollen season, and in 1 patient no clear reason could be identified although she had asthma as a risk factor. After implementation of quality improvement measures the anaphylaxis rate fell to 0 of 8948 injections for years 2013 and 2014.

CONCLUSION

Errors in the mixing and administration of allergy serum comprised the majority of identifiable factors that led to anaphylaxis. Implementation of quality measures, including vial verification and vial testing, can improve safety and decrease anaphylaxis rates in the delivery of allergy immunotherapy.

摘要

背景

过敏治疗的皮下免疫疗法(SCIT)最严重的潜在并发症是过敏反应。制定质量措施的目的是降低因 SCIT 引起的并发症发生率,提高提供的护理安全性。

方法

在实施质量措施(包括小瓶验证、小瓶测试和 6 个过敏治疗点的标准化培训)之前,测量了 2008 年至 2012 年 SCIT 引起的过敏反应的发生率和特征。然后,在实施这些流程措施后的 2 年内,前瞻性地跟踪错误和过敏反应率。

结果

2008 年至 2012 年期间,有 9 例过敏反应或每年 0.02%的注射,8 名患者有足够的信息来获得有意义的数据。患者识别错误导致 2 例过敏反应,剂量错误 2 例,配药错误 1 例。在 2 例患者中,过敏反应发生在花粉季节进展期间,1 例患者无明确原因,尽管她有哮喘作为危险因素。在实施质量改进措施后,2013 年和 2014 年,过敏反应率从 8948 次注射中降至 0。

结论

在混合和管理过敏血清过程中的错误是导致过敏反应的大多数可识别因素。实施质量措施,包括小瓶验证和小瓶测试,可以提高过敏免疫治疗的安全性并降低过敏反应率。

相似文献

1
Impact of quality improvement measures on the delivery of allergy immunotherapy: a 2-year follow-up.质量改进措施对变应原免疫治疗实施的影响:2 年随访。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2015 Jun;5(6):513-6. doi: 10.1002/alr.21487. Epub 2015 Apr 6.
2
Defining quality metrics and improving safety and outcome in allergy care.定义过敏护理质量指标,提高安全性和改善结果。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2014 Apr;4(4):284-91. doi: 10.1002/alr.21284. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
3
Anaphylaxis: still a ghost behind allergen immunotherapy.过敏反应:仍是变应原免疫疗法背后的幽灵。
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014 Aug;14(4):316-22. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000075.
4
Allergy immunotherapy safety: location matters!变应原免疫治疗的安全性:位置很重要!
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2013 Sep-Oct;1(5):455-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2013.08.001. Epub 2013 Aug 30.
5
Safety considerations in providing allergen immunotherapy in the office.在诊所提供变应原免疫疗法的安全考量
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Jun;24(3):226-30. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000257.
6
Immunologic effect and tolerability of intra-seasonal subcutaneous immunotherapy with an 8-day up-dosing schedule to 10,000 standardized quality-units: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.免疫效果和耐受性的季节性皮下免疫治疗与 8 天增毒方案到 10000 标准化质量单位:一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。
Clin Ther. 2012 Oct;34(10):2072-81. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.09.006.
7
Novel routes for allergen immunotherapy: safety, efficacy and mode of action.新型变应原免疫治疗途径:安全性、疗效和作用模式。
Immunotherapy. 2012 Feb;4(2):201-12. doi: 10.2217/imt.11.171.
8
Safety of home-based and office allergy immunotherapy: A multicenter prospective study.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999 Nov;121(5):553-61. doi: 10.1016/S0194-5998(99)70055-0.
9
Oral immunotherapy for peanut allergy: multipractice experience with epinephrine-treated reactions.口服免疫疗法治疗花生过敏:接受肾上腺素治疗的过敏反应的多实践经验。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2014 Jan-Feb;2(1):91-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2013.10.001.
10
AAAAI/ACAAI surveillance study of subcutaneous immunotherapy, years 2008-2012: an update on fatal and nonfatal systemic allergic reactions.AAAAI/ACAAI 监测研究:皮下免疫治疗,2008-2012 年:全身性过敏反应致死和非致死的最新情况。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2014 Mar-Apr;2(2):161-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2014.01.004.