Choi Victor, Kate Mahesh, Kosior Jayme C, Buck Brian, Steve Trevor, McCourt Rebecca, Jeerakathil Thomas, Shuaib Ashfaq, Emery Derek, Butcher Ken
Division of Neurology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Int J Stroke. 2015 Jun;10(4):582-8. doi: 10.1111/ijs.12438. Epub 2015 Apr 6.
Perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging is not routinely used to investigate stroke/transient ischemic attack. Many clinicians use perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging selectively in patients with more severe neurological deficits, but optimal selection criteria have never been identified.
AIMS AND/OR HYPOTHESIS: We tested the hypothesis that a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score threshold can be used to predict the presence of perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging deficits in patients with acute ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack.
National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores were prospectively assessed in 131 acute stroke/transient ischemic attack patients followed by magnetic resonance imaging, including perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging within 72 h of symptom onset. Patients were dichotomized based on the presence or absence of perfusion deficits using a threshold of Tmax (time to peak maps after the impulse response) delay ≥four-seconds and a hypoperfused tissue volume of ≥1 ml.
Patients with perfusion deficits (77/131, 59%) had higher median (interquartile range) National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores (8 [12]) than those without perfusion deficits (3 [4], P < 0.001). A receiver operator characteristic analysis indicated poor to moderate sensitivity of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores for predicting perfusion deficits (area under the curve = 0.787). A National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of ≥6 was associated with specificity of 85%, but sensitivity of only 69%. No National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score threshold identified all cases of perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging deficits with sensitivity >94%.
Although higher National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores are predictive of perfusion deficits, many patients with no clinically detectable signs have persisting cerebral blood flow changes. A National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score threshold should therefore not be used to select patients for perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging should be considered in all patients presenting with acute focal neurological deficits, even if these deficits are transient.
灌注加权磁共振成像并非常规用于研究中风/短暂性脑缺血发作。许多临床医生仅在神经功能缺损较严重的患者中选择性地使用灌注加权磁共振成像,但尚未确定最佳选择标准。
目的和/或假设:我们检验了这样一个假设,即美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分阈值可用于预测急性缺血性中风/短暂性脑缺血发作患者是否存在灌注加权磁共振成像缺损。
前瞻性评估了131例急性中风/短暂性脑缺血发作患者的NIHSS评分,随后进行磁共振成像检查,包括在症状发作后72小时内进行灌注加权磁共振成像。根据Tmax(脉冲响应后的峰值时间图)延迟≥4秒和灌注不足组织体积≥1ml的阈值,将患者分为有灌注缺损和无灌注缺损两组。
有灌注缺损的患者(77/131,59%)的NIHSS评分中位数(四分位间距)(8[12])高于无灌注缺损的患者(3[4],P<0.001)。受试者工作特征分析表明,NIHSS评分对预测灌注缺损的敏感性较差至中等(曲线下面积=0.787)。NIHSS评分≥6与特异性85%相关,但敏感性仅为69%。没有NIHSS评分阈值能识别出所有灌注加权磁共振成像缺损病例,且敏感性>94%。
尽管较高的NIHSS评分可预测灌注缺损,但许多无临床可检测体征的患者仍存在持续的脑血流变化。因此,不应使用NIHSS评分阈值来选择进行灌注加权磁共振成像的患者。对于所有出现急性局灶性神经功能缺损的患者,即使这些缺损是短暂性的,也应考虑进行灌注加权磁共振成像。