Suppr超能文献

作为消费者的患者:赋权还是商品化?当代生物伦理学的潮流。

The patient as consumer: empowerment or commodification? Currents in contemporary bioethics.

作者信息

Goldstein Melissa M, Bowers Daniel G

机构信息

Associate Professor of Health Policy at the Milken Institute School of Public Health at the George Washington University in Washington, D.C.

出版信息

J Law Med Ethics. 2015 Spring;43(1):162-5. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12203.

Abstract

Discussions surrounding patient engagement and empowerment often use the terms "patient" and "consumer" interchangeably. But do the two terms hold the same meaning, or is a "patient" a passive actor in the health care arena and a "consumer" an informed, rational decision-maker? Has there been a shift in our usage of the two terms that aligns with the increasing commercialization of health care in the U.S. or has the patient/consumer dynamic always been a part of the buying and selling of health care in the American system? Recent discussions of the issue exist in the popular press and in social media forums such as TEDMED, but few direct analyses of the ethical, legal, and policy ramifications of this possible shift in terminology are available in the academic literature. This paper analyzes our usage of the terms and any recent changes in the dynamic and discusses the ethical, legal, and policy implications of this simple terminology for the physicianpatient relationship.

摘要

围绕患者参与和赋权的讨论经常互换使用“患者”和“消费者”这两个术语。但这两个术语的含义相同吗?或者说,“患者”在医疗保健领域是被动参与者,而“消费者”是明智、理性的决策者吗?随着美国医疗保健商业化程度的提高,我们对这两个术语的使用是否发生了转变?还是说患者/消费者的这种动态关系一直是美国医疗保健买卖体系的一部分?近期大众媒体以及TEDMED等社交媒体论坛都对该问题进行了讨论,但学术文献中很少有对这种术语转变可能带来的伦理、法律和政策影响的直接分析。本文分析了我们对这些术语的使用情况以及动态关系中的任何近期变化,并讨论了这种简单术语转变对医患关系的伦理、法律和政策影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验