Murphy David J, Ogbu Ogbonna C, Coopersmith Craig M
Emory Critical Care Center, Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Atlanta, GA; Department of Surgery, Atlanta, GA.
Emory Critical Care Center, Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Atlanta, GA; Department of Surgery, Atlanta, GA.
Chest. 2015 Apr;147(4):1168-1178. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-1567.
Improving value within critical care remains a priority because it represents a significant portion of health-care spending, faces high rates of adverse events, and inconsistently delivers evidence-based practices. ICU directors are increasingly required to understand all aspects of the value provided by their units to inform local improvement efforts and relate effectively to external parties. A clear understanding of the overall process of measuring quality and value as well as the strengths, limitations, and potential application of individual metrics is critical to supporting this charge. In this review, we provide a conceptual framework for understanding value metrics, describe an approach to developing a value measurement program, and summarize common metrics to characterize ICU value. We first summarize how ICU value can be represented as a function of outcomes and costs. We expand this equation and relate it to both the classic structure-process-outcome framework for quality assessment and the Institute of Medicine's six aims of health care. We then describe how ICU leaders can develop their own value measurement process by identifying target areas, selecting appropriate measures, acquiring the necessary data, analyzing the data, and disseminating the findings. Within this measurement process, we summarize common metrics that can be used to characterize ICU value. As health care, in general, and critical care, in particular, changes and data become more available, it is increasingly important for ICU leaders to understand how to effectively acquire, evaluate, and apply data to improve the value of care provided to patients.
提高重症监护的价值仍然是一个优先事项,因为它占医疗保健支出的很大一部分,面临着高比例的不良事件,并且循证实践的实施情况参差不齐。重症监护病房主任越来越需要了解其所在科室所提供价值的各个方面,以便为当地的改进工作提供信息,并与外部各方进行有效沟通。清楚地了解衡量质量和价值的整体过程以及各个指标的优势、局限性和潜在应用,对于支持这项任务至关重要。在本综述中,我们提供了一个理解价值指标的概念框架,描述了制定价值衡量计划的方法,并总结了用于描述重症监护病房价值的常见指标。我们首先总结了重症监护病房的价值如何表示为结果和成本的函数。我们扩展这个等式,并将其与质量评估的经典结构-过程-结果框架以及医学研究所提出的医疗保健六大目标联系起来。然后,我们描述了重症监护病房的领导者如何通过确定目标领域、选择合适的措施、获取必要的数据、分析数据以及传播研究结果来制定自己的价值衡量过程。在这个衡量过程中,我们总结了可用于描述重症监护病房价值的常见指标。随着总体医疗保健,尤其是重症监护领域的变化以及数据越来越容易获取,重症监护病房的领导者了解如何有效地获取、评估和应用数据以提高为患者提供的护理价值变得越来越重要。