• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对3岁以下药物难治性癫痫儿童进行迷走神经刺激。

Vagus nerve stimulation in children less than 3 years with medically intractable epilepsy.

作者信息

Fernandez Luis, Gedela Satyanarayana, Tamber Mandeep, Sogawa Yoshimi

机构信息

Division of Child Neurology, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.

Division of Child Neurology, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, United States; University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics and Neurology, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.

出版信息

Epilepsy Res. 2015 May;112:37-42. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2015.02.009. Epub 2015 Feb 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2015.02.009
PMID:25847337
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe the characteristics of children less than three years of age with medically intractable epilepsy, who underwent Vagus Nerve Stimulator (VNS) therapy at Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh between 2004 and 2011.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients were identified; adequate follow-up was available for 15. Median follow up duration was 4.3 years (1.4-10.2 years). 12/15 (80%) had a known etiology for their epilepsy. All patients had more than 1 seizure per week prior to VNS and a history of status epilepticus was frequent (40%, 6/15). Five patients (33%) reported improved seizure frequency at one year after VNS. A normal MRI was associated with seizure improvement (p=0.007). No patient had status epilepticus after VNS at one-year follow-up. At three years after VNS, four patients had experienced status epilepticus with only one patient experiencing multiple episodes. Complications were seen in 2/15 (13%) patients and in 2/21 (9.5%) procedures.

SIGNIFICANCE

A normal MRI was associated with seizure improvement at one year in children less than three years of age at the time of VNS implant. The degree of overall seizure reduction was modest, but the frequency of status epilepticus was decreased after VNS implant. VNS was tolerated well in this age group.

摘要

目的

描述2004年至2011年间在匹兹堡儿童医院接受迷走神经刺激器(VNS)治疗的3岁以下难治性癫痫患儿的特征。

方法

回顾性病历审查。

结果

确定了17例患者;15例有足够的随访资料。中位随访时间为4.3年(1.4 - 10.2年)。15例中有12例(80%)癫痫病因明确。所有患者在VNS治疗前每周发作超过1次,癫痫持续状态病史常见(40%,6/15)。5例患者(33%)报告VNS治疗1年后癫痫发作频率有所改善。MRI正常与癫痫发作改善相关(p = 0.007)。1年随访时,VNS治疗后无患者发生癫痫持续状态。VNS治疗3年后,4例患者发生癫痫持续状态,仅1例患者发作多次。15例患者中有2例(13%)出现并发症,21例手术中有2例(9.5%)出现并发症。

意义

VNS植入时年龄小于3岁的儿童,MRI正常与1年后癫痫发作改善相关。癫痫发作总体减少程度适中,但VNS植入后癫痫持续状态的频率降低。该年龄组对VNS耐受性良好。

相似文献

1
Vagus nerve stimulation in children less than 3 years with medically intractable epilepsy.对3岁以下药物难治性癫痫儿童进行迷走神经刺激。
Epilepsy Res. 2015 May;112:37-42. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2015.02.009. Epub 2015 Feb 16.
2
Vagus nerve stimulation for drug-resistant epilepsy: a European long-term study up to 24 months in 347 children.迷走神经刺激术治疗耐药性癫痫:一项针对347名儿童长达24个月的欧洲长期研究。
Epilepsia. 2014 Oct;55(10):1576-84. doi: 10.1111/epi.12762. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
3
Refractory epilepsy in tuberous sclerosis: vagus nerve stimulation with or without subsequent resective surgery.结节性硬化症的耐药性癫痫:迷走神经刺激术联合或不联合后续切除术。
Epilepsy Behav. 2009 Nov;16(3):454-60. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2009.08.018. Epub 2009 Sep 19.
4
Vagus nerve stimulation for children with treatment-resistant epilepsy: a consecutive series of 141 cases.迷走神经刺激术治疗难治性癫痫患儿:141例连续病例系列研究
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2011 May;7(5):491-500. doi: 10.3171/2011.2.PEDS10505.
5
Vagus nerve stimulation for refractory epilepsy in children: More to VNS than seizure frequency reduction.儿童难治性癫痫的迷走神经刺激:迷走神经刺激的作用不止于降低癫痫发作频率。
Epilepsia. 2009 May;50(5):1220-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.01940.x. Epub 2009 Dec 15.
6
The effect of vagus nerve stimulator in controlling status epilepticus in children.迷走神经刺激器对控制儿童癫痫持续状态的作用。
Seizure. 2018 Feb;55:66-69. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2018.01.010. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
7
Long term effect of vagus nerve stimulation in pediatric intractable epilepsy: an extended follow-up.迷走神经刺激术治疗小儿难治性癫痫的长期疗效:延长随访
Childs Nerv Syst. 2016 Apr;32(4):641-6. doi: 10.1007/s00381-015-3004-z. Epub 2016 Jan 15.
8
Long-term outcome of vagus nerve stimulation therapy after failed epilepsy surgery.癫痫手术后失败的迷走神经刺激治疗的长期结果。
Seizure. 2011 Apr;20(3):244-8. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2010.12.003. Epub 2010 Dec 31.
9
Effect of vagus nerve stimulation on emergency department utilization in children with drug-resistant epilepsy: a retrospective cohort study.迷走神经刺激对耐药性癫痫患儿急诊科利用的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2024 Jun 21;34(3):260-267. doi: 10.3171/2024.4.PEDS23310. Print 2024 Sep 1.
10
The efficacy of vagal nerve stimulation in children with pharmacoresistant epilepsy: practical experience at a Turkish tertiary referral center.迷走神经刺激术治疗药物难治性癫痫儿童的疗效:土耳其三级转诊中心的实践经验。
Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2010 Jul;14(4):334-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2009.09.010. Epub 2009 Oct 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation would be an alternative to implantable cervical vagus nerve stimulation in some situation.经皮耳迷走神经刺激在某些情况下可能是植入式颈部迷走神经刺激的替代方法。
J Tradit Chin Med. 2023 Jun;43(3):627-630. doi: 10.19852/j.cnki.jtcm.20230308.002.
2
Up to What Extent Does Dravet Syndrome Benefit From Neurostimulation Techniques?德拉韦特综合征在多大程度上受益于神经刺激技术?
Front Neurol. 2022 Apr 13;13:843975. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.843975. eCollection 2022.
3
[Results of vagus nerve stimulator implantation in children and adolescents with treatment-refractory epilepsy].
[迷走神经刺激器植入治疗儿童及青少年难治性癫痫的结果]
HNO. 2022 May;70(5):389-395. doi: 10.1007/s00106-022-01164-y. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
4
Hospital costs associated with vagus nerve stimulation and medical treatment in pediatric patients with refractory epilepsy.难治性癫痫患儿迷走神经刺激术及药物治疗的住院费用。
Epilepsia. 2022 May;63(5):1141-1151. doi: 10.1111/epi.17208. Epub 2022 Mar 13.
5
Preliminary analysis of the effect of vagus nerve stimulation in the treatment of children with intractable epilepsy.迷走神经刺激术治疗儿童难治性癫痫效果的初步分析
World J Clin Cases. 2020 Dec 6;8(23):5918-5925. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i23.5918.
6
Health Technology Assessment Report on Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Drug-Resistant Epilepsy.《迷走神经刺激治疗耐药性癫痫的卫生技术评估报告》
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 24;17(17):6150. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176150.
7
Non-pharmacological Interventions for Intractable Epilepsy.难治性癫痫的非药物干预措施
Saudi Pharm J. 2020 Aug;28(8):951-962. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2020.06.016. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
8
Research progress of vagus nerve stimulation in the treatment of epilepsy.迷走神经刺激术治疗癫痫的研究进展。
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2019 Nov;25(11):1222-1228. doi: 10.1111/cns.13209. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
9
The Present and Future of Vagus Nerve Stimulation.迷走神经刺激术的现状与未来
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2019 May;62(3):344-352. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2019.0037. Epub 2019 May 1.
10
A review of vagus nerve stimulation as a therapeutic intervention.迷走神经刺激作为一种治疗干预手段的综述。
J Inflamm Res. 2018 May 16;11:203-213. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S163248. eCollection 2018.