Takach Mary, Townley Charles, Yalowich Rachel, Kinsler Sarah
Mary Takach (
Charles Townley is a policy specialist at NASHP.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Apr;34(4):662-72. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.1083.
Multipayer collaboratives of all types will encounter legal, logistical, and often political obstacles that multipayer medical home initiatives have already overcome. The seventeen multipayer medical home initiatives launched between 2008 and 2014 all navigated four critical decision-making points: convening stakeholders; establishing provider participation criteria; determining payment; and measuring performance. Although we observed trends toward voluntary payer participation and more flexible participation criteria for both payers and providers, initiatives continue to vary widely, each shaped largely by its insurance market and policy environment. Medical home initiatives across the United States are demonstrating that multipayer reform, although complex and difficult to implement, is feasible when committed stakeholders negotiate strategies that are responsive to the local context. Their experiences can inform, and perhaps expedite, negotiations in current and future multipayer collaborations.
各类多方支付合作组织都会遇到多方支付医疗之家倡议已经克服的法律、后勤以及常常是政治上的障碍。2008年至2014年间启动的17个多方支付医疗之家倡议都经历了四个关键决策点:召集利益相关者;确立提供者参与标准;确定支付方式;以及衡量绩效。尽管我们观察到了自愿支付方参与的趋势以及针对支付方和提供者的更灵活参与标准,但各倡议之间仍存在很大差异,每个倡议在很大程度上都由其保险市场和政策环境所塑造。美国各地的医疗之家倡议表明,多方支付改革虽然复杂且难以实施,但当坚定的利益相关者协商出适应当地情况的策略时,就是可行的。它们的经验可以为当前和未来多方支付合作中的谈判提供参考,或许还能加快谈判进程。