Jones Craig, Finison Karl, McGraves-Lloyd Katharine, Tremblay Timothy, Mohlman Mary Kate, Tanzman Beth, Hazard Miki, Maier Steven, Samuelson Jenney
1 Vermont Blueprint for Health , Department of Health Access, Williston, Vermont.
2 Onpoint Health Data , Portland, Maine.
Popul Health Manag. 2016 Jun;19(3):196-205. doi: 10.1089/pop.2015.0055. Epub 2015 Sep 8.
Patient-centered medical home programs using different design and implementation strategies are being tested across the United States, and the impact of these programs on outcomes for a general population remains unclear. Vermont has pursued a statewide all-payer program wherein medical home practices are supported with additional staffing from a locally organized shared resource, the community health team. Using a 6-year, sequential, cross-sectional methodology, this study reviewed annual cost, utilization, and quality outcomes for patients attributed to 123 practices participating in the program as of December 2013 versus a comparison population from each year attributed to nonparticipating practices. Populations are grouped based on their practices' stage of participation in a calendar year (Pre-Year, Implementation Year, Scoring Year, Post-Year 1, Post-Year 2). Annual risk-adjusted total expenditures per capita at Pre-Year for the participant group and comparison group were not significantly different. The difference-in-differences change from Pre-Year to Post-Year 2 indicated that the participant group's expenditures were reduced by -$482 relative to the comparison (95% CI, -$573 to -$391; P < .001). The lower costs were driven primarily by inpatient (-$218; P < .001) and outpatient hospital expenditures (-$154; P < .001), with associated changes in inpatient and outpatient hospital utilization. Medicaid participants also had a relative increase in expenditures for dental, social, and community-based support services ($57; P < .001). Participants maintained higher rates on 9 of 11 effective and preventive care measures. These results suggest that Vermont's community-oriented medical home model is associated with improved outcomes for a general population at lower expenditures and utilization. (Population Health Management 2016;19:196-205).
美国各地正在测试采用不同设计和实施策略的以患者为中心的医疗之家项目,而这些项目对普通人群治疗效果的影响仍不明确。佛蒙特州推行了一项全州范围的全付费者项目,通过当地组织的共享资源社区健康团队提供的额外人员配置来支持医疗之家实践。本研究采用为期6年的序列横断面方法,回顾了截至2013年12月参与该项目的123家医疗机构的患者的年度成本、利用率和质量结果,并与每年归因于未参与项目的医疗机构的对照人群进行比较。人群根据其所在医疗机构在日历年中的参与阶段进行分组(前一年、实施年、评分年、后第1年、后第2年)。参与者组和对照组在前一年的年度风险调整后人均总支出无显著差异。从前一年到后第2年的差异变化表明,参与者组的支出相对于对照组减少了482美元(95%CI,-573美元至-391美元;P < 0.001)。成本降低主要由住院支出(-218美元;P < 0.001)和门诊医院支出(-154美元;P < 0.001)推动,同时住院和门诊医院利用率也发生了相应变化。医疗补助参与者在牙科、社会和社区支持服务方面的支出也相对增加(57美元;P < 0.001)。参与者在11项有效和预防保健措施中的9项上保持了更高的比率。这些结果表明,佛蒙特州以社区为导向的医疗之家模式与普通人群以更低的支出和利用率获得更好的治疗效果相关。(《人口健康管理》2016年;19:第196 - 205页)