• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

检测耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的四种诊断方法的比较

Comparison of four diagnostic methods for detection of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

作者信息

Pourmand Mohammad Reza, Hassanzadeh Sepideh, Mashhadi Rahil, Askari Emran

机构信息

Department of Pathobiology, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Biotechnology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Iran J Microbiol. 2014 Oct;6(5):341-4.

PMID:25848525
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4385575/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a well-known pathogen with a worldwide distribution. Given the increasing rate of MRSA infections, implementing of reliable, accurate and rapid testing for diagnosis of MRSA is necessary. The aim of this study was to compare four diagnostic methods for detection of MRSA isolates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From December 2012 to April 2014, 120 S. aureus isolates were collected from three hospitals affiliated with Tehran University of Medical Sciences. MRSA isolates were detected by four different methods including cefoxitin disc diffusion test, oxacillin disc diffusion test, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of oxacillin as determined by MIC test strip, and mecA detection by PCR.

RESULTS

Out of 120 S. aureus isolates, cefoxitin disc diffusion test, oxacillin disc diffusion test and MIC test strip identified 60 (50%), 48 (40%), 55 (45.83%) isolates as MRSA, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for oxacillin disc diffusion, cefoxitin disc diffusion and MIC of oxacillin were 80% and 100%, 100% and 100%, and 91.6% and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Cefoxitin disc diffusion test is reliable substitute for detection of MRSA in clinical laboratory where MIC detection and molecular methods are not accessible.

摘要

背景与目的

耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)是一种广为人知且在全球范围内分布的病原体。鉴于MRSA感染率不断上升,实施可靠、准确且快速的检测方法以诊断MRSA十分必要。本研究旨在比较四种检测MRSA分离株的诊断方法。

材料与方法

2012年12月至2014年4月,从德黑兰医科大学附属的三家医院收集了120株金黄色葡萄球菌分离株。通过四种不同方法检测MRSA分离株,包括头孢西丁纸片扩散法、苯唑西林纸片扩散法、用MIC试纸条测定苯唑西林的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)以及通过聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测mecA。

结果

在120株金黄色葡萄球菌分离株中,头孢西丁纸片扩散法、苯唑西林纸片扩散法和MIC试纸条分别鉴定出60株(50%)、48株(40%)、55株(45.83%)为MRSA。苯唑西林纸片扩散法、头孢西丁纸片扩散法和苯唑西林MIC的敏感性和特异性分别为80%和100%、100%和100%、91.6%和100%。

结论

在无法进行MIC检测和分子方法检测的临床实验室中,头孢西丁纸片扩散法是检测MRSA的可靠替代方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64c1/4385575/63c14c10a2f8/IJM-6-341f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64c1/4385575/63c14c10a2f8/IJM-6-341f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64c1/4385575/63c14c10a2f8/IJM-6-341f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of four diagnostic methods for detection of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus.检测耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的四种诊断方法的比较
Iran J Microbiol. 2014 Oct;6(5):341-4.
2
mecA-positive methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates in Zenica-Doboj Canton, Bosnia and Herzegovina.波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那泽尼察-多博伊州的携带mecA基因的甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌临床分离株
J Chemother. 2015;27(6):330-6. doi: 10.1179/1973947814Y.0000000207. Epub 2014 Aug 11.
3
Comparison of cefoxitin disc diffusion test, oxacillin screen agar, and PCR for mecA gene for detection of MRSA.头孢西丁纸片扩散试验、苯唑西林筛选琼脂和用于检测耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的mecA基因的聚合酶链反应(PCR)的比较。
Indian J Med Microbiol. 2009 Jan-Mar;27(1):27-9.
4
[Comparison of Cefoxitin Disk Diffusion Test, Automated System and Chromogenic Medium for Detection of Methicillin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus Isolates].[头孢西丁纸片扩散试验、自动化系统及显色培养基检测金黄色葡萄球菌分离株耐甲氧西林情况的比较]
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2013 Jan;47(1):11-8. doi: 10.5578/mb.4304.
5
[Phenotypic methods for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus].[检测耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的表型方法]
Rev Esp Quimioter. 2015 Apr;28(2):98-100.
6
Prevalence and genotypic relatedness of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a tertiary care hospital.一家三级护理医院中耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的患病率及基因型相关性
J Postgrad Med. 2014 Oct-Dec;60(4):386-9. doi: 10.4103/0022-3859.143964.
7
Assessment of different tests to detect methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus.检测耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的不同试验评估
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2009 Jul;40(4):801-6.
8
Evaluation and comparison of tests to detect methicillin resistant S. aureus.检测耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的试验评估与比较
Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2010 Jan-Mar;53(1):79-82. doi: 10.4103/0377-4929.59189.
9
Evaluation of a disk diffusion method with cefoxitin (30 microg) for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.用头孢西丁(30微克)纸片扩散法检测耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的评估。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2004 May;23(5):389-92. doi: 10.1007/s10096-004-1130-8. Epub 2004 Apr 27.
10
[Short communication: use of cefoxitin disc diffusion method for the detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates].[简短通讯:用头孢西丁纸片扩散法检测金黄色葡萄球菌临床分离株的耐甲氧西林情况]
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2007 Jan;41(1):109-13.

引用本文的文献

1
Discordant β-Lactam Susceptibility in Clinical Isolates: A Molecular and Phenotypical Exploration to Detect the BORSA/MODSA Isolates in Bogotá, Colombia.临床分离株中β-内酰胺敏感性不一致:对哥伦比亚波哥大检测BORSA/MODSA分离株的分子与表型探索
Microorganisms. 2024 Dec 16;12(12):2598. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12122598.
2
Increased incidence of methicillin resistant and methicillin resistant in the skin and nasal carriage among healthcare workers and inanimate hospital surfaces after the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情后,医护人员皮肤和鼻腔携带以及医院无生命表面的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌和耐甲氧西林表皮葡萄球菌发病率增加。
Iran J Microbiol. 2024 Oct;16(5):584-597. doi: 10.18502/ijm.v16i5.16791.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of different phenotypic and genotypic methods for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.不同表型和基因型方法检测耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的比较
N Am J Med Sci. 2013 Nov;5(11):637-40. doi: 10.4103/1947-2714.122305.
2
Evaluation of phenotypic with genotypic methods for species identification and detection of methicillin resistant in Staphylococcus aureus.采用表型和基因型方法对金黄色葡萄球菌进行菌种鉴定及耐甲氧西林检测的评估。
Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2012 Jul;2(2):84-91. doi: 10.4103/2229-516X.106348.
3
Detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus by polymerase chain reaction and conventional methods: a comparative study.
Epidemiology of clinically isolated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and its susceptibility to linezolid and vancomycin in Egypt: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
埃及临床分离耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的流行病学及其对利奈唑胺和万古霉素的敏感性:系统评价与荟萃分析。
BMC Infect Dis. 2023 Apr 26;23(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08202-2.
4
Development of a High Sensitive Multiplex Lateral Flow Immunoassay (LFIA) System for Rapid Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA).用于快速检测耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的高灵敏度多重侧向流动免疫分析(LFIA)系统的开发。
Avicenna J Med Biotechnol. 2023 Apr-Jun;15(2):100-107.
5
Comparison of Phenotypic and Genotypic Characterization Methods for the Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus.用于检测耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的表型和基因型鉴定方法的比较
Cureus. 2022 Mar 22;14(3):e23396. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23396. eCollection 2022 Mar.
6
Prevalence and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profile of in Milk and Traditionally Processed Dairy Products in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.在埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴的牛奶和传统加工乳制品中 的流行情况和抗菌药物敏感性分析。
Biomed Res Int. 2021 Jul 16;2021:5576873. doi: 10.1155/2021/5576873. eCollection 2021.
7
Comparison of PCR and phenotypic methods for the detection of methicillin resistant .用于检测耐甲氧西林的聚合酶链反应(PCR)方法与表型方法的比较
Iran J Microbiol. 2021 Feb;13(1):31-36. doi: 10.18502/ijm.v13i1.5489.
8
Methicillin-Resistant (MRSA) in Slaughter Houses and Meat Shops in Capital Territory of Pakistan During 2018-2019.2018 - 2019年期间巴基斯坦首都地区屠宰场和肉店中的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)
Front Microbiol. 2020 Sep 28;11:577707. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.577707. eCollection 2020.
9
Monitoring and Characteristics of Major Mastitis Pathogens from Bulk Tank Milk in Korea.韩国原料奶中主要乳腺炎病原体的监测与特征
Animals (Basel). 2020 Sep 2;10(9):1562. doi: 10.3390/ani10091562.
10
Molecular analysis of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from four teaching hospitals in Iran: the emergence of novel MRSA clones.对伊朗 4 家教学医院耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌分离株的分子分析:新型耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌克隆的出现。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2020 Jul 17;9(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s13756-020-00777-8.
通过聚合酶链反应和传统方法检测金黄色葡萄球菌中的耐甲氧西林情况:一项比较研究。
J Lab Physicians. 2012 Jul;4(2):83-8. doi: 10.4103/0974-2727.105587.
4
Global epidemiology of community-associated methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA).社区相关性耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(CA-MRSA)的全球流行病学。
Curr Opin Microbiol. 2012 Oct;15(5):588-95. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2012.08.003. Epub 2012 Oct 5.
5
Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): global epidemiology and harmonisation of typing methods.耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA):全球流行病学和分型方法的协调统一。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2012 Apr;39(4):273-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2011.09.030. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
6
Slime layer formation and the prevalence of mecA and aap genes in Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates.表皮葡萄球菌分离株中黏液层形成以及mecA和aap基因的流行情况。
J Infect Dev Ctries. 2011 Feb 1;5(1):34-40. doi: 10.3855/jidc.984.
7
Comparison of polymerase chain reaction and conventional methods in detecting methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.聚合酶链反应与传统方法在检测耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌中的比较。
J Infect Dev Ctries. 2008 Feb 1;2(1):46-50. doi: 10.3855/jidc.321.
8
Two time-series analyses of the impact of antibiotic consumption and alcohol-based hand disinfection on the incidences of nosocomial methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection and Clostridium difficile infection.两项关于抗生素使用和酒精基手部消毒对医院获得性耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染和艰难梭菌感染发生率影响的时间序列分析。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009 Apr;30(4):346-53. doi: 10.1086/596605.
9
Comparison of cefoxitin disc diffusion test, oxacillin screen agar, and PCR for mecA gene for detection of MRSA.头孢西丁纸片扩散试验、苯唑西林筛选琼脂和用于检测耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的mecA基因的聚合酶链反应(PCR)的比较。
Indian J Med Microbiol. 2009 Jan-Mar;27(1):27-9.
10
Comparison of cefoxitin and oxacillin disk diffusion methods for detection of mecA-mediated resistance in Staphylococcus aureus in a large-scale study.在一项大规模研究中,头孢西丁和苯唑西林纸片扩散法检测金黄色葡萄球菌中mecA介导耐药性的比较
J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Jan;47(1):217-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01506-08. Epub 2008 Nov 19.