Suppr超能文献

电子临床数据如何改善卫生技术评估。

How electronic clinical data can improve health technology assessment.

作者信息

Treadwell Jonathan R, Erinoff Eileen, Coates Vivian

机构信息

ECRI Institute.

出版信息

EGEMS (Wash DC). 2013 Oct 28;1(2):1028. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1028. eCollection 2013.

Abstract

Health technology assessments represent comprehensive summaries of available evidence and information on a technology. They are used by medical decision makers in a variety of ways, including diagnostic testing, treatment selection, care management, patient perspectives, patient safety, insurance coverage, pharmaceutical innovation, equipment planning, device purchasing, and total cost-of-care. Electronic clinical data, which are captured routinely by clinicians and hospitals, are only rarely incorporated into formal health technology assessments. This disconnect reveals a key opportunity. In this paper, we discuss current uses of electronic clinical data, several benefits of including it in health technology assessments, potential pitfalls of that inclusion, and the implications for better medical decisions.

摘要

卫生技术评估代表了关于某项技术的现有证据和信息的全面总结。医疗决策者以多种方式使用这些评估,包括诊断测试、治疗选择、护理管理、患者观点、患者安全、保险覆盖范围、药物创新、设备规划、设备采购以及总护理成本。临床医生和医院常规收集的电子临床数据很少被纳入正式的卫生技术评估中。这种脱节揭示了一个关键机遇。在本文中,我们讨论了电子临床数据的当前用途、将其纳入卫生技术评估的若干益处、纳入过程中可能存在的陷阱以及对做出更好医疗决策的影响。

相似文献

1
How electronic clinical data can improve health technology assessment.电子临床数据如何改善卫生技术评估。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2013 Oct 28;1(2):1028. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1028. eCollection 2013.
2
Health technology assessment, value-based decision making, and innovation.卫生技术评估、基于价值的决策与创新。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013 Oct;29(4):353-9. doi: 10.1017/S0266462313000378. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
4
Understanding the medical and nonmedical value of diagnostic testing.了解诊断检测的医学和非医学价值。
Value Health. 2010 Mar-Apr;13(2):310-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00597.x. Epub 2009 Sep 10.
5
Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 2 of 4).加拿大避孕共识(共四部分,第二部分)
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Nov;37(11):1033-9. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30054-8.
6
Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 1 of 4).加拿大避孕共识(共4部分,第1部分)
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Oct;37(10):936-42. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30033-0.
7
Hospital-based expert model for health technology procurement planning in hospitals.
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2014;2014:3504-7. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2014.6944378.

引用本文的文献

1
A SWOT analysis of the development of health technology assessment in Iran.伊朗卫生技术评估发展的 SWOT 分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 30;18(3):e0283663. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283663. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

3
A review of evidence on consent bias in research.关于研究中同意偏差的证据综述。
Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(4):42-4. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2013.767958.
5
Does consent bias research?同意会影响研究吗?
Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(4):27-37. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2013.767955.
9
Informed consent: a broken contract.知情同意:一份破裂的契约。
Nature. 2012 Jun 20;486(7403):312-4. doi: 10.1038/486312a.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验