• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
How electronic clinical data can improve health technology assessment.电子临床数据如何改善卫生技术评估。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2013 Oct 28;1(2):1028. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1028. eCollection 2013.
2
Health technology assessment, value-based decision making, and innovation.卫生技术评估、基于价值的决策与创新。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013 Oct;29(4):353-9. doi: 10.1017/S0266462313000378. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
3
Purchasing of medical equipment in public hospitals: the mini-HTA tool.公立医院医疗设备采购:小型-HTA 工具。
S Afr Med J. 2011 Nov 1;101(11):807-8.
4
Understanding the medical and nonmedical value of diagnostic testing.了解诊断检测的医学和非医学价值。
Value Health. 2010 Mar-Apr;13(2):310-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00597.x. Epub 2009 Sep 10.
5
Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 2 of 4).加拿大避孕共识(共四部分,第二部分)
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Nov;37(11):1033-9. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30054-8.
6
Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 1 of 4).加拿大避孕共识(共4部分,第1部分)
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Oct;37(10):936-42. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30033-0.
7
Hospital-based expert model for health technology procurement planning in hospitals.
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2014;2014:3504-7. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2014.6944378.
8
请你提供一下具体的原文内容,以便我进行翻译。
9
Going digital: a checklist in preparing for hospital-wide electronic medical record implementation and digital transformation.走向数字化:医院全面实施电子病历及数字化转型的准备清单。
Aust Health Rev. 2019 Jul;43(3):302-313. doi: 10.1071/AH17153.
10
Laboratory testing in primary care: A systematic review of health IT impacts.基层医疗中的实验室检测:健康信息技术影响的系统评价。
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Aug;116:52-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.05.009. Epub 2018 May 21.

引用本文的文献

1
A SWOT analysis of the development of health technology assessment in Iran.伊朗卫生技术评估发展的 SWOT 分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 30;18(3):e0283663. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283663. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Non-randomized studies as a source of complementary, sequential or replacement evidence for randomized controlled trials in systematic reviews on the effects of interventions.在关于干预措施效果的系统评价中,非随机研究作为随机对照试验补充性、序贯性或替代性证据的来源。
Res Synth Methods. 2013 Mar;4(1):49-62. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1078.
2
A framework for the analysis of heterogeneity of treatment effect in patient-centered outcomes research.患者中心结局研究中治疗效果异质性分析框架。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Aug;66(8):818-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.02.009. Epub 2013 May 4.
3
A review of evidence on consent bias in research.关于研究中同意偏差的证据综述。
Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(4):42-4. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2013.767958.
4
Informed consent, big data, and the oxymoron of research that is not research.知情同意、大数据以及非研究之研究的矛盾说法。
Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(4):40-2. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2013.768864.
5
Does consent bias research?同意会影响研究吗?
Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(4):27-37. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2013.767955.
6
A Markov model of the cost-effectiveness of pharmacist care for diabetes in prevention of cardiovascular diseases: evidence from Kaiser Permanente Northern California.药剂师护理糖尿病预防心血管疾病成本效益的马尔可夫模型:来自北加利福尼亚凯撒医疗集团的证据
J Manag Care Pharm. 2013 Mar;19(2):102-14. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2013.19.2.102.
7
From concepts, theory, and evidence of heterogeneity of treatment effects to methodological approaches: a primer.从治疗效果异质性的概念、理论和证据到方法学方法:简介。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Dec 13;12:185. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-185.
8
Screening electronic veterans' health records for medication discontinuation.筛查电子退伍军人健康记录以了解药物停用情况。
Am J Manag Care. 2012 Jul;18(7):352-8.
9
Informed consent: a broken contract.知情同意:一份破裂的契约。
Nature. 2012 Jun 20;486(7403):312-4. doi: 10.1038/486312a.
10
Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy in obese patients with diabetes.肥胖伴糖尿病患者的减肥手术与强化内科治疗的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Apr 26;366(17):1567-76. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1200225. Epub 2012 Mar 26.

电子临床数据如何改善卫生技术评估。

How electronic clinical data can improve health technology assessment.

作者信息

Treadwell Jonathan R, Erinoff Eileen, Coates Vivian

机构信息

ECRI Institute.

出版信息

EGEMS (Wash DC). 2013 Oct 28;1(2):1028. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1028. eCollection 2013.

DOI:10.13063/2327-9214.1028
PMID:25848573
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4371479/
Abstract

Health technology assessments represent comprehensive summaries of available evidence and information on a technology. They are used by medical decision makers in a variety of ways, including diagnostic testing, treatment selection, care management, patient perspectives, patient safety, insurance coverage, pharmaceutical innovation, equipment planning, device purchasing, and total cost-of-care. Electronic clinical data, which are captured routinely by clinicians and hospitals, are only rarely incorporated into formal health technology assessments. This disconnect reveals a key opportunity. In this paper, we discuss current uses of electronic clinical data, several benefits of including it in health technology assessments, potential pitfalls of that inclusion, and the implications for better medical decisions.

摘要

卫生技术评估代表了关于某项技术的现有证据和信息的全面总结。医疗决策者以多种方式使用这些评估,包括诊断测试、治疗选择、护理管理、患者观点、患者安全、保险覆盖范围、药物创新、设备规划、设备采购以及总护理成本。临床医生和医院常规收集的电子临床数据很少被纳入正式的卫生技术评估中。这种脱节揭示了一个关键机遇。在本文中,我们讨论了电子临床数据的当前用途、将其纳入卫生技术评估的若干益处、纳入过程中可能存在的陷阱以及对做出更好医疗决策的影响。