• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发电子数据方法基础设施以参与协作研究网络。

Developing electronic data methods infrastructure to participate in collaborative research networks.

作者信息

Priest Elisa L, Klekar Christopher, Cantu Gabriela, Berryman Candice, Garinger Gina, Hall Lauren, Kouznetsova Maria, Kudyakov Rustam, Masica Andrew

机构信息

Baylor Scott & White Health.

出版信息

EGEMS (Wash DC). 2014 Dec 2;2(1):1126. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1126. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.13063/2327-9214.1126
PMID:25848600
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4371420/
Abstract

CONTEXT

Collaborative networks support the goals of a learning health system by sharing, aggregating, and analyzing data to facilitate identification of best practices care across delivery organizations. This case study describes the infrastructure and process developed by an integrated health delivery system to successfully prepare and submit a complex data set to a large national collaborative network.

CASE DESCRIPTION

We submitted four years of data for a diverse population of patients in specific clinical areas: diabetes, chronic heart failure, sepsis, and hip, knee, and spine. The most recent submission included 19 tables, more than 376,000 unique patients, and almost 5 million patient encounters. Data was extracted from multiple clinical and administrative systems.

LESSONS LEARNED

We found that a structured process with documentation was key to maintaining communication, timelines, and quality in a large-scale data submission to a national collaborative network. The three key components of this process were the experienced project team, documentation, and communication. We used a formal QA and feedback process to track and review data. Overall, the data submission was resource intensive and required an incremental approach to data quality.

CONCLUSION

Participation in collaborative networks can be time and resource intense, however it can serve as a catalyst to increase the technical data available to the learning health system.

摘要

背景

协作网络通过共享、汇总和分析数据来支持学习型健康系统的目标,以促进在各个医疗机构中识别最佳实践护理。本案例研究描述了一个综合医疗服务系统开发的基础设施和流程,该系统成功地准备并向一个大型国家协作网络提交了一个复杂的数据集。

案例描述

我们提交了特定临床领域中不同患者群体的四年数据,这些领域包括糖尿病、慢性心力衰竭、败血症以及髋部、膝盖和脊柱疾病。最近一次提交的数据包括19个表格、超过37.6万名独特患者以及近500万次患者就诊记录。数据从多个临床和管理系统中提取。

经验教训

我们发现,对于向国家协作网络进行大规模数据提交而言,一个有文档记录的结构化流程是维持沟通、时间表和质量的关键。该流程的三个关键组成部分是经验丰富的项目团队、文档记录和沟通。我们使用正式的质量保证和反馈流程来跟踪和审查数据。总体而言,数据提交资源密集,需要采用渐进式方法来保证数据质量。

结论

参与协作网络可能在时间和资源方面要求很高,然而它可以成为增加学习型健康系统可用技术数据的催化剂。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5af6/4371420/bbdbeb0a030f/egems1126f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5af6/4371420/b0d6e085a92b/egems1126f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5af6/4371420/afa97ab1c5cf/egems1126f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5af6/4371420/bbdbeb0a030f/egems1126f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5af6/4371420/b0d6e085a92b/egems1126f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5af6/4371420/afa97ab1c5cf/egems1126f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5af6/4371420/bbdbeb0a030f/egems1126f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Developing electronic data methods infrastructure to participate in collaborative research networks.开发电子数据方法基础设施以参与协作研究网络。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2014 Dec 2;2(1):1126. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1126. eCollection 2014.
2
Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.基层医疗研究团队评估(PCRTA):开发与评估
Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 2002 Feb(81):iii-vi, 1-72.
3
Pediatric collaborative networks for quality improvement and research.用于质量改进和研究的儿科协作网络。
Acad Pediatr. 2013 Nov-Dec;13(6 Suppl):S69-74. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2013.07.004.
4
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
5
Modifying the electronic health record to facilitate the implementation and evaluation of a bundled care program for intensive care unit delirium.修改电子健康记录以促进重症监护病房谵妄综合护理计划的实施与评估。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2014 Dec 18;2(1):1121. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1121. eCollection 2014.
6
A Collaborative Learning Network Approach to Improvement: The CUSP Learning Network.一种用于改进的协作学习网络方法:CUSP学习网络。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2015 Apr;41(4):147-59. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(15)41020-7.
7
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
8
Pediatric collaborative improvement networks: background and overview.儿科合作改进网络:背景与概述。
Pediatrics. 2013 Jun;131 Suppl 4:S189-95. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-3786E.
9
The Pioneering Role of the Vaccine Safety Datalink Project (VSD) to Advance Collaborative Research and Distributed Data Networks.疫苗安全数据链项目(VSD)在推进协作研究和分布式数据网络方面的开创性作用。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2015 Dec 29;3(1):1195. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1195. eCollection 2015.
10
Team Science Approach to Developing Consensus on Research Good Practices for Practice-Based Research Networks: A Case Study.基于团队科学方法就实践型研究网络的研究良好实践达成共识:一项案例研究。
Clin Transl Sci. 2015 Dec;8(6):632-7. doi: 10.1111/cts.12363. Epub 2015 Nov 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Learning health systems in primary care: a systematic scoping review.基层医疗中的学习健康系统:系统范围界定综述。
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Jun 23;22(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01483-z.
2
A method for interoperable knowledge-based data quality assessment.一种基于知识的可互操作的数据质量评估方法。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Mar 9;21(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01458-1.
3
A Framework for Classification of Electronic Health Data Extraction-Transformation-Loading Challenges in Data Network Participation.数据网络参与中电子健康数据提取-转换-加载挑战的分类框架。

本文引用的文献

1
Availability of structured and unstructured clinical data for comparative effectiveness research and quality improvement: a multisite assessment.用于比较效果研究和质量改进的结构化与非结构化临床数据的可获取性:一项多中心评估
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2014 Jul 11;2(1):1079. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1079. eCollection 2014.
2
eGEMs: Pathways to Success for Multisite Clinical Data Research.电子生成式证据模型:多中心临床数据研究的成功途径
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2013 Sep 19;1(1):1041. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1041. eCollection 2013.
3
Recommendations for the use of operational electronic health record data in comparative effectiveness research.
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2017 Jun 13;5(1):10. doi: 10.5334/egems.222.
4
Data Cleaning in the Evaluation of a Multi-Site Intervention Project.多地点干预项目评估中的数据清理
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2017 Dec 15;5(3):4. doi: 10.5334/egems.196.
5
A Data Driven Approach to Achieving High Value Healthcare.一种实现高价值医疗保健的数据驱动方法。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2017 Dec 15;5(3):1. doi: 10.5334/egems.241.
关于在比较效果研究中使用电子健康记录操作数据的建议。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2013 Oct 8;1(1):1018. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1018. eCollection 2013.
4
Data quality assessment for comparative effectiveness research in distributed data networks.分布式数据网络中比较有效性研究的数据质量评估。
Med Care. 2013 Aug;51(8 Suppl 3):S22-9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31829b1e2c.
5
Challenges in using electronic health record data for CER: experience of 4 learning organizations and solutions applied.使用电子健康记录数据进行临床效果研究的挑战:4 个学习型组织的经验及应用的解决方案。
Med Care. 2013 Aug;51(8 Suppl 3):S80-6. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31829b1d48.
6
A pragmatic framework for single-site and multisite data quality assessment in electronic health record-based clinical research.基于电子健康记录的临床研究中单站点和多站点数据质量评估的实用框架。
Med Care. 2012 Jul;50 Suppl(0):S21-9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318257dd67.