• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
eGEMs: Pathways to Success for Multisite Clinical Data Research.电子生成式证据模型:多中心临床数据研究的成功途径
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2013 Sep 19;1(1):1041. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1041. eCollection 2013.
2
Security and privacy requirements for a multi-institutional cancer research data grid: an interview-based study.多机构癌症研究数据网格的安全与隐私要求:一项基于访谈的研究
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2009 Jun 15;9:31. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-9-31.
3
Tuberculosis结核病
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
The project data sphere initiative: accelerating cancer research by sharing data.项目数据领域计划:通过数据共享加速癌症研究
Oncologist. 2015 May;20(5):464-e20. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0431. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
6
Data governance and data sharing agreements for community-wide health information exchange: lessons from the beacon communities.社区范围健康信息交换的数据治理与数据共享协议:来自灯塔社区的经验教训
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2014 Apr 23;2(1):1057. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1057. eCollection 2014.
7
Building a Governance Strategy for CER: The Patient Outcomes Research to Advance Learning (PORTAL) Network Experience.构建比较效果研究的治理策略:推进学习的患者结局研究(PORTAL)网络经验
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2016 Mar 28;4(2):1216. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1216. eCollection 2016.
8
eGEMs' Early Adventures in Open Access Publishing.eGEMs在开放获取出版领域的早期探索。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2014 Oct 9;2(1):1157. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1157. eCollection 2014.
9
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
10
eGEMs: Pragmatic Publishing to Build a Learning Health System.电子健康与医学创新:务实出版以构建学习型健康系统。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2012 Dec 20;1(1):1001. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1001. eCollection 2013.

引用本文的文献

1
Caribbean data-sharing initiatives: activities of the Eastern Caribbean Health Outcomes Research Network.加勒比地区数据共享倡议:东加勒比健康结果研究网络的活动
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2024 Dec 16;48:e121. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2024.121. eCollection 2024.
2
An open natural language processing (NLP) framework for EHR-based clinical research: a case demonstration using the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C).基于电子健康记录的临床研究的开放自然语言处理 (NLP) 框架:使用国家 COVID 队列协作 (N3C) 的案例展示。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Nov 17;30(12):2036-2040. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad134.
3
Artificial intelligence in neuroradiology: a scoping review of some ethical challenges.神经放射学中的人工智能:对一些伦理挑战的范围界定性综述
Front Radiol. 2023 May 15;3:1149461. doi: 10.3389/fradi.2023.1149461. eCollection 2023.
4
Ethics Issues Arising in the Transition to Learning Health Care Systems: Results from Interviews with Leaders from 25 Health Systems.向学习型医疗保健系统转型过程中出现的伦理问题:对25个医疗系统领导者的访谈结果
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2016 Mar 29;4(2):1212. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1212. eCollection 2016.
5
Developing electronic data methods infrastructure to participate in collaborative research networks.开发电子数据方法基础设施以参与协作研究网络。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2014 Dec 2;2(1):1126. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1126. eCollection 2014.

本文引用的文献

1
Modifications to the HIPAA Privacy, Security, Enforcement, and Breach Notification rules under the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act; other modifications to the HIPAA rules.根据《经济和临床健康医疗信息技术法案》及《遗传信息非歧视法案》对《健康保险流通与责任法案》隐私、安全、执法及违规通知规则的修改;对《健康保险流通与责任法案》规则的其他修改。
Fed Regist. 2013 Jan 25;78(17):5565-702.
2
Approaches to facilitate institutional review board approval of multicenter research studies.促进机构审查委员会批准多中心研究的方法。
Med Care. 2012 Jul;50 Suppl:S77-81. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31825a76eb.
3
Federating clinical data from six pediatric hospitals: process and initial results from the PHIS+ Consortium.整合来自六家儿科医院的临床数据:PHIS+联盟的流程与初步结果
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2011;2011:994-1003. Epub 2011 Oct 22.
4
Data governance and stewardship: designing data stewardship entities and advancing data access.数据治理和管理:设计数据管理实体并推进数据访问。
Health Serv Res. 2010 Oct;45(5 Pt 2):1442-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01140.x. Epub 2010 Aug 2.
5
Standards for privacy of individually identifiable health information.
Health Care Law Mon. 2003 Jan:13-20.

电子生成式证据模型:多中心临床数据研究的成功途径

eGEMs: Pathways to Success for Multisite Clinical Data Research.

作者信息

McGraw Jd Deven C, Leiter Jd Alice B

机构信息

Center for Democracy and Technology.

出版信息

EGEMS (Wash DC). 2013 Sep 19;1(1):1041. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1041. eCollection 2013.

DOI:10.13063/2327-9214.1041
PMID:25848568
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4371512/
Abstract

There are numerous and significant challenges associated with leveraging electronic clinical data (ECD) for purposes beyond treating an individual patient and getting paid for that care. Optimizing this secondary use of clinical data is a key underpinning of many health reform goals and triggers numerous issues related to data stewardship and, more broadly, data governance. These challenges often involve legal, policy, and procedural issues related to the access, use, and disclosure of electronic health record (EHR) data for quality improvement and research. This paper contributes to the ongoing discussion of health data governance by detailing the experiences of nine multisite research initiatives across the country. The rich set of experiences from these initiatives, as well as a number of resources used by project participants to work through various challenges, are documented and collected here for others wishing to learn from their collective efforts. The paper does not attempt to catalog the full spectrum of governance issues that could potentially surface in the course of multisite research projects using ECD. Rather, the goal was to provide a snapshot in time of data-sharing challenges and navigation strategies, as well as validation that privacy-protective, legally compliant clinical data sharing across sites is currently possible. Finally, the paper also provides a foundation and framing for a broader community resource on governance-a "governance toolkit"-that will create a virtual space for the further discussion and sharing of promising practices.

摘要

将电子临床数据(ECD)用于治疗个体患者及获取该治疗费用以外的目的,存在诸多重大挑战。优化临床数据的这种二次利用是许多医疗改革目标的关键支撑,并引发了诸多与数据管理以及更广泛的数据治理相关的问题。这些挑战通常涉及与电子健康记录(EHR)数据的访问、使用和披露相关的法律、政策和程序问题,以用于质量改进和研究。本文通过详细介绍全国九个多中心研究项目的经验,为正在进行的健康数据治理讨论做出了贡献。这些项目丰富的经验集,以及项目参与者用于应对各种挑战的一些资源,在此记录并收集起来,供其他希望从他们的集体努力中学习的人参考。本文并未试图罗列在使用ECD的多中心研究项目过程中可能出现的所有治理问题。相反,目标是及时呈现数据共享挑战和导航策略的概况,以及验证目前跨站点进行隐私保护、符合法律规定的临床数据共享是可行的。最后,本文还为一个更广泛的关于治理的社区资源——“治理工具包”——提供了基础和框架,该工具包将创建一个虚拟空间,用于进一步讨论和分享有前景的实践。