• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

犹他州灯塔计划经验:整合质量改进、健康信息技术和实践促进措施以改善小型医疗保健机构的糖尿病治疗效果。

The utah beacon experience: integrating quality improvement, health information technology, and practice facilitation to improve diabetes outcomes in small health care facilities.

作者信息

Tennison Janet, Rajeev Deepthi, Woolsey Sarah, Black Jeff, Oostema Steven J, North Christie

机构信息

HealthInsight.

出版信息

EGEMS (Wash DC). 2014 Aug 20;2(3):1100. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1100. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.13063/2327-9214.1100
PMID:25848624
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4371443/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The Utah Improving Care through Connectivity and Collaboration (IC3) Beacon community (2010-2013) was spearheaded by HealthInsight, a nonprofit, community-based organization. One of the main objectives of IC(3) was to improve health care provided to patients with diabetes in three Utah counties, collaborating with 21 independent smaller clinics and two large health care enterprises. This paper will focus on the use of health information technology (HIT) and practice facilitation to develop and implement new care processes to improve clinic workflow and ultimately improve patients' diabetes outcomes at 21 participating smaller, independent clinics.

INNOVATION

Early in the project, we learned that most of the 21 clinics did not have the resources needed to successfully implement quality improvement (QI) initiatives. IC(3) helped clinics effectively use data generated from their electronic health records (EHRs) to design and implement interventions to improve patients' diabetes outcomes. This close coupling of HIT, expert practice facilitation, and Learning Collaboratives was found to be especially valuable in clinics with limited resources.

FINDINGS

Through this process we learned that (1) an extensive readiness assessment improved clinic retention, (2) clinic champions were important for a successful collaboration, and (3) current EHR systems have limited functionality to assist in QI initiatives. In general, smaller, independent clinics lack knowledge and experience with QI and have limited HIT experience to improve patient care using electronic clinical data. Additionally, future projects like IC(3) Beacon will be instrumental in changing clinic culture so that QI is integrated into routine workflow.

CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION

Our efforts led to significant changes in how practice staff optimized their EHRs to manage and improve diabetes care, while establishing the framework for sustainability. Some of the IC(3) Beacon practices are currently smoothly transitioning to new models of care such as Patient-Centered Medical Homes. Thus, IC(3) Beacon has been instrumental in creating a strong community partnership among various organizations to meet the shared vision of better health and lower costs, and the experience over the last few years has helped the community prepare for the changing health care landscape.

摘要

目的

犹他州通过连通性与协作改善医疗(IC3)灯塔社区项目(2010 - 2013年)由非营利性的社区组织健康洞察(HealthInsight)牵头。IC(3)的主要目标之一是在犹他州的三个县改善为糖尿病患者提供的医疗服务,与21家独立的小型诊所和两家大型医疗企业合作。本文将聚焦于利用健康信息技术(HIT)和实践促进来开发并实施新的护理流程,以改善诊所工作流程,并最终改善21家参与项目的小型独立诊所中患者的糖尿病治疗效果。

创新

在项目早期,我们了解到21家诊所中的大多数都没有成功实施质量改进(QI)举措所需的资源。IC(3)帮助诊所有效利用其电子健康记录(EHR)生成的数据来设计和实施干预措施,以改善患者的糖尿病治疗效果。事实证明,在资源有限的诊所中,HIT、专业实践促进和学习协作的这种紧密结合尤其有价值。

研究结果

通过这个过程我们了解到:(1)广泛的准备情况评估提高了诊所的留存率;(2)诊所倡导者对于成功的合作很重要;(3)当前的电子健康记录系统在协助质量改进举措方面功能有限。总体而言,小型独立诊所缺乏质量改进方面的知识和经验,且利用电子临床数据改善患者护理的健康信息技术经验有限。此外,未来像IC(3)灯塔这样的项目将有助于改变诊所文化,使质量改进融入日常工作流程。

结论与讨论

我们的努力导致了实践人员在如何优化其电子健康记录以管理和改善糖尿病护理方面发生了重大变化,同时建立了可持续性框架。IC(3)灯塔项目的一些实践目前正在顺利过渡到新的护理模式,如以患者为中心的医疗之家。因此,IC(3)灯塔项目有助于在各组织之间建立强大的社区伙伴关系,以实现改善健康和降低成本的共同愿景,过去几年的经验帮助社区为不断变化的医疗格局做好准备。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/875a/4371443/67f4295fb7b8/egems1100f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/875a/4371443/67f4295fb7b8/egems1100f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/875a/4371443/67f4295fb7b8/egems1100f1.jpg

相似文献

1
The utah beacon experience: integrating quality improvement, health information technology, and practice facilitation to improve diabetes outcomes in small health care facilities.犹他州灯塔计划经验:整合质量改进、健康信息技术和实践促进措施以改善小型医疗保健机构的糖尿病治疗效果。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2014 Aug 20;2(3):1100. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1100. eCollection 2014.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Developing a communitywide electronic health record disease registry in primary care practices: lessons learned from the Western new york beacon community.在基层医疗实践中建立全社区电子健康记录疾病登记系统:来自纽约西部灯塔社区的经验教训。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2014 Sep 4;2(3):1089. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1089. eCollection 2014.
4
The journey of primary care practices to meaningful use: a Colorado Beacon Consortium study.初级保健实践迈向有意义使用的历程:科罗拉多灯塔联盟研究。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2013 Sep-Oct;26(5):603-11. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2013.05.120344.
5
Evaluating the Reliability of EHR-Generated Clinical Outcomes Reports: A Case Study.评估电子健康记录生成的临床结果报告的可靠性:一项案例研究。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2014 Oct 23;2(3):1102. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1102. eCollection 2014.
6
7
Supporting primary care practices in building capacity to use health information data.支持基层医疗实践机构提升利用健康信息数据的能力。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2014 Aug 4;2(3):1094. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1094. eCollection 2014.
8
A Practice Facilitation and Academic Detailing Intervention Can Improve Cancer Screening Rates in Primary Care Safety Net Clinics.实践促进与学术推广干预可提高基层医疗安全网诊所的癌症筛查率。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;29(5):533-42. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2016.05.160109.
9
The Southeastern Minnesota Beacon Project for Community-driven Health Information Technology: Origins, Achievements, and Legacy.明尼苏达州东南部社区驱动的健康信息技术灯塔项目:起源、成就与遗产。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2014 Oct 28;2(3):1101. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1101. eCollection 2014.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Using Electronic Health Records to Measure Quality Improvement Efforts: Findings from a Large Practice Facilitation Initiative.利用电子健康记录衡量质量改进工作:一项大型实践促进计划的结果
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2020 Jan;46(1):11-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2019.09.006. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
2
Impact of Practice Facilitation in Primary Care on Chronic Disease Care Processes and Outcomes: a Systematic Review.基层医疗中实践促进对慢性病护理过程和结果的影响:系统评价。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Nov;33(11):1968-1977. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4581-9. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
3
Practice Facilitator Strategies for Addressing Electronic Health Record Data Challenges for Quality Improvement: EvidenceNOW.

本文引用的文献

1
Increasing capacity for quality improvement in underresourced primary care settings.提高资源匮乏的基层医疗环境中的质量改进能力。
Qual Manag Health Care. 2014 Jul-Sep;23(3):155-62. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000031.
2
Applications of social constructivist learning theories in knowledge translation for healthcare professionals: a scoping review.社会建构主义学习理论在医疗保健专业人员知识转化中的应用:范围综述。
Implement Sci. 2014 May 6;9:54. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-54.
3
Small practices' experience with EHR, quality measurement, and incentives.
应对电子健康记录数据挑战以促进质量改进的实践促进者策略:EvidenceNOW。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2018 May-Jun;31(3):398-409. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.03.170274.
4
IT-enabled Community Health Interventions: Challenges, Opportunities, and Future Directions.信息技术支持的社区卫生干预措施:挑战、机遇与未来方向。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2014 Oct 30;2(3):1117. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1117. eCollection 2014.
5
eGEMs' Early Adventures in Open Access Publishing.eGEMs在开放获取出版领域的早期探索。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2014 Oct 9;2(1):1157. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1157. eCollection 2014.
小型医疗机构在电子健康记录、质量评估及激励措施方面的经验。
Am J Manag Care. 2013 Nov;19(10 Spec No):eSP12-8.
4
Using coaching to create empowered nursing leadership to change lives.
J Contin Educ Nurs. 2014 Jan;45(1):12-3. doi: 10.3928/00220124-20140103-14.
5
A national study of challenges to electronic health record adoption and meaningful use.一项关于电子健康记录采用和有意义使用面临挑战的全国性研究。
Med Care. 2014 Feb;52(2):144-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000038.
6
Quality improvement training: experiences of frontline staff.质量改进培训:一线员工的经验
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2013;26(7):627-41. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-10-2011-0056.
7
A randomized trial of practice facilitation to improve the delivery of chronic illness care in primary care: initial and sustained effects.一项实践促进随机试验,以改善初级保健中慢性病护理的提供:初始和持续效果。
Implement Sci. 2013 Aug 22;8:93. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-93.
8
Nurses amidst change: the concept of change fatigue offers an alternative perspective on organizational change.变革中的护士:变革疲劳的概念为组织变革提供了另一种视角。
Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2013 Feb;14(1):26-32. doi: 10.1177/1527154413481811. Epub 2013 Apr 2.
9
Small physician practices in new york needed sustained help to realize gains in quality from use of electronic health records.纽约的小型医生诊所需要持续的帮助,才能从使用电子健康记录中获得质量的提高。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Jan;32(1):53-62. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0742.
10
The role of the champion in primary care change efforts: from the State Networks of Colorado Ambulatory Practices and Partners (SNOCAP).初级保健变革努力中的冠军角色:来自科罗拉多州门诊实践和合作伙伴州网络(SNOCAP)。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2012 Sep-Oct;25(5):676-85. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2012.05.110281.