• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

同性伴侣共同生活的意义及婚姻的重要性。

The Significance of Living Together and Importance of Marriage in Same-Sex Couples.

作者信息

Haas Stephen M, Whitton Sarah W

机构信息

a Department of Communication , University of Cincinnati , Cincinnati , Ohio , USA.

出版信息

J Homosex. 2015;62(9):1241-63. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2015.1037137. Epub 2015 Apr 7.

DOI:10.1080/00918369.2015.1037137
PMID:25848857
Abstract

Because marriage has been denied to same-sex couples, it is likely that the meaning and significance ascribed to non-marital cohabitation may be unique. Further, it is unclear whether same-sex couples view marriage as important to their relationships, and if they do, why. Using qualitative data from 526 individuals in cohabiting same-sex relationships across 47 states, we explored (1) the meaning and significance of cohabitation and (2) the perceived importance of legal marriage to the relationship. Participants viewed cohabitation as significant, most commonly because it indicates long-term commitment, provides emotional support, makes the couple a family, and allows them to share life together. Marriage was perceived as important to a majority (90%), most commonly because it confers financial and legal benefits, relational legitimacy, and demonstrates the same commitment as different-sex couples. Overall, findings highlight the symbolic significance of cohabitation and importance of access to legal marriage to adults in same-sex relationships.

摘要

由于同性伴侣被剥夺了结婚的权利,赋予非婚姻同居的意义和重要性可能是独特的。此外,目前尚不清楚同性伴侣是否认为婚姻对他们的关系很重要,如果是,原因是什么。我们利用来自47个州526名处于同居同性关系中的个体的定性数据,探讨了(1)同居的意义和重要性,以及(2)法定婚姻对这种关系的重要性。参与者认为同居很重要,最常见的原因是它表明了长期承诺,提供了情感支持,使伴侣成为一个家庭,并让他们能够共同分享生活。大多数人(90%)认为婚姻很重要,最常见的原因是它带来经济和法律利益、关系的合法性,并表明与异性伴侣相同的承诺。总体而言,研究结果凸显了同居的象征意义以及获得法定婚姻对同性关系中的成年人的重要性。

相似文献

1
The Significance of Living Together and Importance of Marriage in Same-Sex Couples.同性伴侣共同生活的意义及婚姻的重要性。
J Homosex. 2015;62(9):1241-63. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2015.1037137. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
2
Shall we marry? Legal marriage as a commitment event in same-sex relationships.我们可以结婚吗?合法婚姻作为同性关系中的一种承诺行为。
J Homosex. 2008;54(4):400-22. doi: 10.1080/00918360801991422.
3
The influence of same-sex marriage on the understanding of same-sex relationships.同性婚姻对同性关系理解的影响。
J Homosex. 2007;53(3):135-51. doi: 10.1300/J082v53n03_08.
4
Same-Sex and Different-Sex Cohabiting Couple Relationship Stability.同性和异性同居伴侣关系的稳定性。
Demography. 2016 Aug;53(4):937-53. doi: 10.1007/s13524-016-0490-x.
5
Same-sex cohabiting elders versus different-sex cohabiting and married elders: effects of relationship status and sex of partner on economic and health outcomes.同性同居老年人与异性同居及已婚老年人:伴侣关系状况和性别对经济及健康状况的影响。
Soc Sci Res. 2014 Jan;43:60-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.09.003. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
6
The close relationships of Lesbians and gay men.女同性恋者和男同性恋者之间的亲密关系。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2007;58:405-24. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085701.
7
The mental health benefits of relationship formalisation among lesbians and gay men in same-sex relationships.同性关系中女同性恋者和男同性恋者关系正式化对心理健康的益处。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2015 Dec;39(6):530-5. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12432. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
8
Change in relationship quality for partners from lesbian, gay male, and heterosexual couples.女同性恋、男同性恋和异性恋伴侣关系质量的变化。
J Fam Psychol. 2008 Oct;22(5):701-11. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.22.5.701.
9
Gay and lesbian couples in Italy: comparisons with heterosexual couples.意大利的同性恋伴侣:与异性恋伴侣的比较。
Fam Process. 2014 Dec;53(4):702-16. doi: 10.1111/famp.12078. Epub 2014 May 28.
10
Before and After "I Do": Marriage Processes for Mid-Life Gay and Lesbian Married Couples.“我愿意”前后:中年同性恋已婚夫妇的婚姻历程
J Homosex. 2018;65(14):1985-2004. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2017.1423213. Epub 2018 Apr 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Policy, Relationships, and Well-Being: Associations Between Mental Health and Main Partner Relationships Among Cisgender Sexual Minority Men in the Context of U.S. State-Level Policies.政策、人际关系与幸福感:美国州级政策背景下,顺性别性少数男性的心理健康与主要伴侣关系之间的关联
Psychol Sex Orientat Gend Divers. 2025 Mar;12(1):72-85. doi: 10.1037/sgd0000648. Epub 2023 May 29.
2
Relationship, marriage, and parenthood aspirations among sexual and gender minority youth assigned female at birth.出生时被指定为女性的性少数和性别少数青年的关系、婚姻和为人父母的愿望。
J Fam Psychol. 2022 Oct;36(7):1161-1172. doi: 10.1037/fam0000990. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
3
Measuring the impact of legal recognition of same-sex marriage among sexual minority women.
衡量同性婚姻合法化对性少数群体女性的影响。
J GLBT Fam Stud. 2021;17(4):371-392. doi: 10.1080/1550428x.2021.1935382. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
4
Family support modifies the effect of changes to same-sex marriage legislation on LGB mental health: evidence from a UK cohort study.家庭支持改变了同性婚姻立法对 LGB 心理健康的影响:来自英国队列研究的证据。
Eur J Public Health. 2022 Feb 1;32(1):35-40. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckab139.
5
Perceived psychosocial impacts of legalized same-sex marriage: A scoping review of sexual minority adults' experiences.法律认可同性婚姻对性少数群体成年人的感知心理社会影响:一项范围综述。
PLoS One. 2021 May 6;16(5):e0249125. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249125. eCollection 2021.
6
Within-person associations between romantic involvement and mental health among sexual and gender minorities assigned female-at-birth.在出生时被指定为女性的性少数群体和性别少数群体中,浪漫关系与心理健康之间的个体内关联。
J Fam Psychol. 2021 Aug;35(5):606-617. doi: 10.1037/fam0000835. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
7
It's complicated: The impact of marriage legalization among sexual minority women and gender diverse individuals in the United States.情况很复杂:美国性少数女性和性别多样化个体婚姻合法化的影响。
Psychol Sex Orientat Gend Divers. 2020 Dec;7(4):396-406. doi: 10.1037/sgd0000375. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
8
Before and After "I Do": Marriage Processes for Mid-Life Gay and Lesbian Married Couples.“我愿意”前后:中年同性恋已婚夫妇的婚姻历程
J Homosex. 2018;65(14):1985-2004. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2017.1423213. Epub 2018 Apr 3.