Çakmakçı Karadoğan Dilek, Balkarlı Ayşe, Önal Özgür, Altınışık Göksel, Çobankara Veli
Department of Chest Diseases, Hopa State Hospital, Artvin, Turkey.
Tuberk Toraks. 2015;63(1):22-30. doi: 10.5578/tt.8673.
Nailfold capillaroscopy (NFC) is a non-invasive diagnostic test that is mostly used for early diagnosis of collagen tissue diseases (CTDs). We aimed to evaluate whether NFC findings could be a clue for discriminating idiopathic interstitial lung diseases (ILD) from CTD associated ILDs (CTD-ILD). Additionally it was aimed to determine whether NFC could be helpful in discriminating usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern from non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) pattern.
We grouped patients into three main groups: 15 CTD-ILD, 18 idiopathic ILD, and 17 patients in the control group. The CTD-ILD group was split into two subgroups: 8 patients with Sjögren's syndrome (SJS)-associated ILD and 7 with rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-associated ILD. The idiopathic-ILD group consisted of 10 idiopathic NSIP and 8 IPF patients. The control group consisted of 10 SJS and 7 RA patients without lung disease. None of the patients were on acute exacerbation at the time of examination, and none had Reynaud's phenomenon.
Mean capillary density was significantly reduced only in the CTD-ILD group as compared to the control group (p= 0.006). In subgroup analysis, it was determined that RA-ILD, IPF, and SJS-ILD subgroups had more severe capillaroscopic abnormalities. Mean capillary density in patients with the UIP pattern was reduced compared to patients with the NSIP pattern and those in the control group; p values were 0.008 and < 0.001, respectively.
This study is to be the first describing and comparing the nailfold capillaroscopic findings of patients with NSIP and UIP patterns. NFC findings can be helpful in discriminating UIP patterns from NSIP patterns. But to show its role in differentiating idiopathic disease, more studies with more patients are needed.
甲襞毛细血管镜检查(NFC)是一种非侵入性诊断测试,主要用于胶原组织疾病(CTD)的早期诊断。我们旨在评估NFC检查结果是否可作为区分特发性间质性肺病(ILD)与CTD相关ILD(CTD-ILD)的线索。此外,旨在确定NFC是否有助于区分普通型间质性肺炎(UIP)模式与非特异性间质性肺炎(NSIP)模式。
我们将患者分为三个主要组:15例CTD-ILD患者、18例特发性ILD患者和17例对照组患者。CTD-ILD组又分为两个亚组:8例干燥综合征(SJS)相关ILD患者和7例类风湿关节炎(RA)相关ILD患者。特发性ILD组由10例特发性NSIP患者和8例特发性肺纤维化(IPF)患者组成。对照组由10例无肺部疾病的SJS患者和7例无肺部疾病的RA患者组成。所有患者在检查时均无急性加重,也无雷诺现象。
与对照组相比,仅CTD-ILD组的平均毛细血管密度显著降低(p = 0.006)。亚组分析确定,RA-ILD、IPF和SJS-ILD亚组的毛细血管镜异常更严重。UIP模式患者的平均毛细血管密度低于NSIP模式患者和对照组患者;p值分别为0.008和<0.001。
本研究是首次描述和比较NSIP和UIP模式患者的甲襞毛细血管镜检查结果。NFC检查结果有助于区分UIP模式与NSIP模式。但要显示其在区分特发性疾病中的作用,还需要对更多患者进行更多研究。