Fredericks Suzanne, Lapum Jennifer, Hui Gladys
Associate Professor;, all at Daphne Cockwell School of Nursing, Ryan University, Toronto, Canada.
Br J Nurs. 2015;24(7):394-400. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2015.24.7.394.
Within patient-centered care (PCC), the individual is viewed as an active member of the healthcare team. While there has been recent interest in conducting systematic reviews to examine the effectiveness of PCC interventions, various studies fall short in explaining the type of intervention most effective in producing significant changes to desired outcomes. The purpose of this systematic review was to determine the characteristics of PCC interventions that have demonstrated effectiveness in enhancing the quality of care and performance of self-care behaviours. A systematic review of 40 studies that addressed PCC interventions, included samples over the age of 18 years, and were published between 1995 and 2014 was performed. Descriptive statistics were used to delineate study, participant, and intervention characteristics. Results suggest PCC-based interventions are not effective when delivered to individuals living with chronic illnesses.
在以患者为中心的护理(PCC)中,个人被视为医疗团队的积极成员。虽然最近人们对进行系统评价以检验PCC干预措施的有效性很感兴趣,但各种研究在解释哪种干预措施对产生预期结果的显著变化最有效方面存在不足。本系统评价的目的是确定已证明在提高护理质量和自我护理行为表现方面有效的PCC干预措施的特征。对40项涉及PCC干预措施、样本年龄在18岁以上且于1995年至2014年间发表的研究进行了系统评价。使用描述性统计来描述研究、参与者和干预措施的特征。结果表明,基于PCC的干预措施在应用于慢性病患者时无效。