Suppr超能文献

考察以患者为中心的护理对治疗结果的影响。

Examining the effect of patient-centred care on outcomes.

作者信息

Fredericks Suzanne, Lapum Jennifer, Hui Gladys

机构信息

Associate Professor;, all at Daphne Cockwell School of Nursing, Ryan University, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Br J Nurs. 2015;24(7):394-400. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2015.24.7.394.

Abstract

Within patient-centered care (PCC), the individual is viewed as an active member of the healthcare team. While there has been recent interest in conducting systematic reviews to examine the effectiveness of PCC interventions, various studies fall short in explaining the type of intervention most effective in producing significant changes to desired outcomes. The purpose of this systematic review was to determine the characteristics of PCC interventions that have demonstrated effectiveness in enhancing the quality of care and performance of self-care behaviours. A systematic review of 40 studies that addressed PCC interventions, included samples over the age of 18 years, and were published between 1995 and 2014 was performed. Descriptive statistics were used to delineate study, participant, and intervention characteristics. Results suggest PCC-based interventions are not effective when delivered to individuals living with chronic illnesses.

摘要

在以患者为中心的护理(PCC)中,个人被视为医疗团队的积极成员。虽然最近人们对进行系统评价以检验PCC干预措施的有效性很感兴趣,但各种研究在解释哪种干预措施对产生预期结果的显著变化最有效方面存在不足。本系统评价的目的是确定已证明在提高护理质量和自我护理行为表现方面有效的PCC干预措施的特征。对40项涉及PCC干预措施、样本年龄在18岁以上且于1995年至2014年间发表的研究进行了系统评价。使用描述性统计来描述研究、参与者和干预措施的特征。结果表明,基于PCC的干预措施在应用于慢性病患者时无效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验