Mahlakõiv Tanel, Hernandez Pedro, Gronke Konrad, Diefenbach Andreas, Staeheli Peter
Institute of Virology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Spemann Graduate School of Biology and Medicine (SGBM), Albert Ludwigs University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; International Max Planck Research School for Molecular and Cell Biology (IMPRS-MCB), Freiburg, Germany; Research Centre Immunology and Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, University of Mainz Medical Centre, Mainz, Germany.
PLoS Pathog. 2015 Apr 7;11(4):e1004782. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004782. eCollection 2015 Apr.
Epithelial cells are a major port of entry for many viruses, but the molecular networks which protect barrier surfaces against viral infections are incompletely understood. Viral infections induce simultaneous production of type I (IFN-α/β) and type III (IFN-λ) interferons. All nucleated cells are believed to respond to IFN-α/β, whereas IFN-λ responses are largely confined to epithelial cells. We observed that intestinal epithelial cells, unlike hematopoietic cells of this organ, express only very low levels of functional IFN-α/β receptors. Accordingly, after oral infection of IFN-α/β receptor-deficient mice, human reovirus type 3 specifically infected cells in the lamina propria but, strikingly, did not productively replicate in gut epithelial cells. By contrast, reovirus replicated almost exclusively in gut epithelial cells of IFN-λ receptor-deficient mice, suggesting that the gut mucosa is equipped with a compartmentalized IFN system in which epithelial cells mainly respond to IFN-λ that they produce after viral infection, whereas other cells of the gut mostly rely on IFN-α/β for antiviral defense. In suckling mice with IFN-λ receptor deficiency, reovirus replicated in the gut epithelium and additionally infected epithelial cells lining the bile ducts, indicating that infants may use IFN-λ for the control of virus infections in various epithelia-rich tissues. Thus, IFN-λ should be regarded as an autonomous virus defense system of the gut mucosa and other epithelial barriers that may have evolved to avoid unnecessarily frequent triggering of the IFN-α/β system which would induce exacerbated inflammation.
上皮细胞是许多病毒的主要入侵门户,但保护屏障表面免受病毒感染的分子网络尚未完全了解。病毒感染会同时诱导I型(IFN-α/β)和III型(IFN-λ)干扰素的产生。据信所有有核细胞都会对IFN-α/β产生反应,而IFN-λ反应主要局限于上皮细胞。我们观察到,与该器官的造血细胞不同,肠道上皮细胞仅表达极低水平的功能性IFN-α/β受体。因此,在对缺乏IFN-α/β受体的小鼠进行口服感染后,3型人类呼肠孤病毒特异性感染了固有层中的细胞,但令人惊讶的是,它并未在肠道上皮细胞中有效复制。相比之下,呼肠孤病毒几乎只在缺乏IFN-λ受体的小鼠的肠道上皮细胞中复制,这表明肠道黏膜配备了一个分区化的IFN系统,其中上皮细胞主要对病毒感染后产生的IFN-λ作出反应,而肠道中的其他细胞大多依赖IFN-α/β进行抗病毒防御。在缺乏IFN-λ受体的乳鼠中,呼肠孤病毒在肠道上皮中复制,并额外感染了胆管内衬的上皮细胞,这表明婴儿可能利用IFN-λ来控制各种富含上皮组织中的病毒感染。因此,IFN-λ应被视为肠道黏膜和其他上皮屏障的自主病毒防御系统,该系统可能已经进化以避免不必要地频繁触发会导致炎症加剧的IFN-α/β系统。