Mahapatra Tanmay, Mahapatra Sanchita, Banerjee Barnali, Mahapatra Umakanta, Samanta Sandip, Pal Debottam, Datta Chakraborty Nandini, Manna Byomkesh, Sur Dipika, Kanungo Suman
Department of Epidemiology, National Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases, P-33, CIT Road, Scheme-XM, Beliaghata, Kolkata-700 010, West Bengal, India.
Department of Data Management, National Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases, P-33, CIT Road, Scheme-XM, Beliaghata, Kolkata-700 010, West Bengal, India.
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 7;10(4):e0123479. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123479. eCollection 2015.
Decades after the establishment of clear guidelines for management, mostly due to irrational approach, diarrhea is still a major concern in the developing world, including India. The scenario is even worse in urban slums owing to poor health-seeking and socio-environmental vulnerability. Determining the distribution of rational diarrhea management by practitioners and identification of its important predictors seemed urgent to minimize the potential for antibiotic resistance, diarrhea-related mortality and morbidity in these areas.
Between May 2011 and January 2012, 264 consenting, randomly selected qualified and non-qualified practitioners (including pharmacists) were interviewed in the slums of Kolkata, a populous city in eastern India, regarding their characteristics, diarrhea-related knowledge (overall and in six separate domains: signs/symptoms, occurrence/spread, management, prevention/control, cholera and ORS), prescribed antibiotics, intravenous fluid (IVF) and laboratory investigations. Rationality was established based on standard textbooks.
Among participants, 53.03% had no medical qualifications, 6.06% were attached to Governmental hospitals, 19.32% had best knowledge regarding diarrhea. While treating diarrhea, 7.20%, 17.80% and 20.08% respectively advised antibiotics, IVF and laboratory tests rationally. Logistic regression revealed that qualified and Governmental-sector practitioners managed diarrhea more rationally. Having best diarrhea-related knowledge regarding signs/symptoms (OR=5.49, p value=0.020), occurrence/spread (OR=3.26, p value=0.035) and overall (OR=6.82, p value=0.006) were associated with rational antibiotic prescription. Rational IVF administration was associated with best knowledge regarding diarrheal signs/symptoms (OR=3.00, p value=0.017), occurrence/spread (OR=3.57, p value=0.004), prevention/control (OR=4.89, p value=0.037), ORS (OR=2.55, p value=0.029) and overall (OR=4.57, p value<0.001). Best overall (OR=2.68, p value=0.020) and cholera-related knowledge (OR=2.34, p value=0.019) were associated with rational laboratory testing strategy.
Diarrheal management practices were unsatisfactory in urban slums where practitioners' knowledge was a strong predictor for rational management. Interventions targeting non-qualified, independent practitioners to improve their diarrhea-related knowledge seemed to be required urgently to ensure efficient management of diarrhea in these endemic settings.
在明确的管理指南制定数十年后,主要由于不合理的处理方式,腹泻在包括印度在内的发展中世界仍是一个主要问题。由于就医行为不佳和社会环境脆弱性,城市贫民窟的情况更为糟糕。确定从业者合理腹泻管理的分布情况并识别其重要预测因素,对于尽量减少这些地区抗生素耐药性、腹泻相关死亡率和发病率的可能性似乎至关重要。
2011年5月至2012年1月期间,在印度东部人口众多的城市加尔各答的贫民窟,对264名同意参与、随机挑选的合格和不合格从业者(包括药剂师)进行了访谈,内容涉及他们的特征、腹泻相关知识(总体以及六个不同领域:体征/症状、发生/传播、管理、预防/控制、霍乱和口服补液盐)、抗生素处方、静脉输液(IVF)和实验室检查。合理性根据标准教科书确定。
参与者中,53.03%没有医学资质,6.06%隶属于政府医院,19.32%对腹泻有最佳知识。在治疗腹泻时,分别有7.20%、17.80%和20.08%合理建议使用抗生素、静脉输液和进行实验室检查。逻辑回归显示,合格和政府部门的从业者对腹泻的管理更合理。对体征/症状(比值比[OR]=5.49,p值=0.020)、发生/传播(OR=3.26,p值=0.035)和总体(OR=6.82,p值=0.006)有最佳腹泻相关知识与合理的抗生素处方相关。合理的静脉输液管理与对腹泻体征/症状(OR=3.00,p值=0.017)、发生/传播(OR=3.57,p值=0.004)、预防/控制(OR=4.89,p值=0.037)、口服补液盐(OR=2.55,p值=0.029)和总体(OR=4.57,p值<0.0