Department of Infectious Diseases, Peking University First Hospital, No.8, XiShiKu Street, Xicheng, District Beijing 100034, China.
BMC Public Health. 2013 Jan 16;13:41. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-41.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the management of acute adult diarrhea in China and assess adherence of clinical practice to national guidelines and 2012 World Gastroenterology Organization guidelines.
A cross-sectional survey was carried out among physicians in 20 hospitals in two different areas of China (Beijing, 10; Shaanxi province, 10). Summary statistics were calculated for the overall study group and for each region. Between-region differences were assessed with χ(2) or t-tests.
Data were collected for 800 patients (≥18 years; mean ± SD age 37.0 ± 16.3 years; 56.4% female). The mean ± SD time between diarrhea onset and visiting a diarrhea clinic was 2.4 ± 1.6 days; this interval was significantly shorter in Beijing than Shaanxi (2.0 ± 1.4 vs 2.8 ± 1.8 days, respectively; p < 0.001). Overall, 31.4% of patients self-medicated before visiting the clinic, most commonly with antibiotics. Routine stool examinations were ordered for 70.6% of patients, vibrio cholera stool culture for 57.5%, but non-vibrio bacteria stool culture for only 11.4%. Only 61.6% of patients received fluid and electrolyte therapy: 28.3% oral rehydration solution (ORS) and 33.4% intravenous fluids (even though only 13.8% needed). Antibiotics were the most common drugs (60.8%) and the most common antibiotics were fluoroquinolones, followed by aminoglycosides. Totally 51.3% of patients received irrational antibiotic treatment (unnecessary for 47.9%; indicated but not prescribed for 3.4%). After antibiotics, the most commonly prescribed drugs were dioctahedral smectite (59.3%); For Shaanxi compared with Beijing, less individuals received ORS (7.8% vs 48.5%,respectively; p < 0.001) and more received intravenous fluids (46.3% vs 20.5%, respectively; p < 0.001). Significantly more of the patients in Shaanxi province were administered antibiotics (64.5% vs 57%, respectively; p = 0.03), and more received intravenous antibiotics than Beijing (49.0% vs 27.0%, respectively; p < 0.001).
Adherence to both national guidelines and 2012 World Gastroenterology Organization guidelines for the management of acute diarrhea in adult was limited among tertiary hospital physicians. The findings suggest nationwide education and effective health policies are needed to improve medical practice and reduce the unnecessary burden on the healthcare system.
本研究旨在评估中国成人急性腹泻的管理情况,并评估临床实践对国家指南和 2012 年世界胃肠病组织指南的依从性。
对中国两个不同地区(北京,10 家;陕西省,10 家)的 20 家医院的医生进行了横断面调查。对整个研究组和每个地区分别计算了汇总统计数据。采用 χ(2)或 t 检验评估地区间差异。
共收集了 800 例(≥18 岁;平均年龄±标准差为 37.0±16.3 岁;56.4%为女性)患者的数据。腹泻发作至就诊腹泻门诊的平均时间为 2.4±1.6 天;北京患者的就诊间隔明显短于陕西(分别为 2.0±1.4 天和 2.8±1.8 天;p<0.001)。总体而言,31.4%的患者在就诊前自行用药,最常使用的是抗生素。70.6%的患者进行了常规粪便检查,57.5%进行了霍乱弧菌粪便培养,但仅有 11.4%进行了非霍乱弧菌粪便培养。仅 61.6%的患者接受了液体和电解质治疗:28.3%口服补液盐(ORS)和 33.4%静脉输液(尽管仅 13.8%需要)。抗生素是最常用的药物(60.8%),最常用的抗生素是氟喹诺酮类,其次是氨基糖苷类。完全有 51.3%的患者接受了不合理的抗生素治疗(不必要的占 47.9%;有适应证但未开处方的占 3.4%)。在使用抗生素后,最常开的药物是双八面体蒙脱石(59.3%);与北京相比,陕西接受 ORS 的患者明显较少(分别为 7.8%和 48.5%;p<0.001),接受静脉输液的患者较多(分别为 46.3%和 20.5%;p<0.001)。陕西省接受抗生素治疗的患者明显较多(分别为 64.5%和 57%;p=0.03),且接受静脉用抗生素的患者也多于北京(分别为 49.0%和 27.0%;p<0.001)。
三级医院医生对国家指南和 2012 年世界胃肠病组织成人急性腹泻管理指南的依从性有限。研究结果表明,需要在全国范围内开展教育和有效的卫生政策,以改善医疗实践并减轻医疗体系的不必要负担。