• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Evaluating the phase model of change during short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy.

作者信息

Hilsenroth M J, Ackerman S J, Blagys M D

出版信息

Psychother Res. 2001 Mar;11(1):29-47. doi: 10.1080/713663851.

DOI:10.1080/713663851
PMID:25849876
Abstract

This study examined the phase model of psychotherapy change (Howard, Lueger, Maling, & Martinovich, 1993; Howard, Moras, Brill, Martinovich, & Lutz, 1996) and assessed the domains of subjective well-being, symptomatic distress, and social/interpersonal functioning during short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy. Specifically, we assessed evaluation/third-session to ninth-session changes in a group of 20 treated patients. These three domains were examined for both statistical and clinically significant change (Jacobson & Truax, 1991). Treatment fidelity and credibility were also evaluated. Statistical and clinically significant improvement in the domains of subjective well-being and symptom distress were evident by the ninth session of short-term dynamic psychotherapy. Statistical and reliable improvement were observed in relational functioning during the same time period. In addition, changes in both subjective well-being and symptomatic distress contributed unique and separate variance to predicting changes in social/interpersonal functioning. The results with respect to the differential effects predicted by the phase model of change during the early course of treatment are discussed.

摘要

相似文献

1
Evaluating the phase model of change during short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy.
Psychother Res. 2001 Mar;11(1):29-47. doi: 10.1080/713663851.
2
Personality and symptom change in treatment-refractory inpatients: evaluation of the phase model of change using Rorschach,TAT, and DSM-IV Axis V.难治性住院患者的人格与症状变化:使用罗夏墨迹测验、主题统觉测验及《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版轴V对改变阶段模型的评估
J Pers Assess. 2004 Dec;83(3):306-22. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8303_12.
3
Relationship between patient pre-treatment object relations functioning and psychodynamic techniques early in treatment.患者治疗前客体关系功能与治疗早期心理动力学技术的关系。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2014 Mar-Apr;21(2):123-31. doi: 10.1002/cpp.1826. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
4
Short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy for depression: an examination of statistical, clinically significant, and technique-specific change.抑郁症的短期心理动力心理治疗:对统计学、临床显著及特定技术变化的考察
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2003 Jun;191(6):349-57. doi: 10.1097/01.NMD.0000071582.11781.67.
5
Efficacy, effectiveness, and expected treatment response in psychotherapy.心理治疗中的疗效、有效性及预期治疗反应
J Clin Psychol. 2003 Jul;59(7):745-50. doi: 10.1002/jclp.10169.
6
Impact of behavioral health consultant interventions on patient symptoms and functioning in an integrated family medicine clinic.行为健康顾问干预对综合家庭医学诊所患者症状及功能的影响。
J Clin Psychol. 2009 Mar;65(3):281-93. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20539.
7
[Does improvement of symptoms four weeks after the begin of psychodynamic inpatient psychotherapy correspond to long term outcome?].[心理动力住院心理治疗开始四周后症状的改善是否与长期结果相符?]
Z Psychosom Med Psychother. 2005;51(4):360-72.
8
Psychodynamic techniques related to outcome for anxiety disorder patients at different points in treatment.与焦虑症患者在治疗不同阶段的治疗结果相关的心理动力学技术。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2014 May;202(5):391-6. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000137.
9
Social functioning of patients with psychotic disorders in long-term psychodynamic group psychotherapy: preliminary research.精神病患者在长期精神动力团体心理治疗中的社会功能:初步研究。
Psychiatr Danub. 2014 Jun;26(2):122-6.
10
Clinical significance and patients' perceived change in four sessions of brief psychodynamic intervention: characteristics of early responders.
Psychol Psychother. 2005 Sep;78(Pt 3):347-62. doi: 10.1348/147608305X25766.

引用本文的文献

1
Why Does Therapy Work? An Idiographic Approach to Explore Mechanisms of Change Over the Course of Psychotherapy Using Digital Assessments.治疗为何有效?一种运用数字评估探索心理治疗过程中变化机制的个性化方法。
Front Psychol. 2020 Apr 24;11:782. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00782. eCollection 2020.
2
Clinical outcomes of psychotherapy dropouts: does dropping out of psychotherapy necessarily mean failure?心理治疗脱落者的临床结局:心理治疗脱落是否一定意味着失败?
Braz J Psychiatry. 2018;40(2):123–127. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2017-2267. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
3
A brief mental health outcomes measure: translation and validation of the Czech version of the Schwartz Outcomes Scale-10.
一种简短的心理健康结果测量工具:施瓦茨结果量表-10捷克语版本的翻译与验证
Qual Life Res. 2006 Mar;15(2):307-12. doi: 10.1007/s11136-005-1389-y.