Diaz F G, Ohaegbulam S, Dujovny M, Ausman J I
Department of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan.
J Neurosurg. 1989 Dec;71(6):846-53. doi: 10.3171/jns.1989.71.6.0846.
Direct surgery on aneurysms in the cavernous sinus is a formidable technical procedure. The intimate relationship of the intracavernous carotid artery to the venous structures and to the cranial nerves make surgical access difficult at best. Thirty-two of 356 aneurysm patients presented with symptomatic aneurysms originating from the intracavernous internal carotid artery. Twenty-one patients had aneurysms contained entirely within the cavernous sinus, and in 11 others the aneurysms arose within the cavernous sinus and extended into the subarachnoid space. Of the purely intracavernous aneurysms there were five small aneurysms (less than 25 mm) and 16 giant (greater than or equal to 25 mm) aneurysms. Fifteen patients with purely intracavernous lesions had a superior orbital fissure syndrome, and six had a variety of other symptoms. Of 11 patients with subarachnoid extension, five had a subarachnoid hemorrhage (Grade I or II), five had ipsilateral visual loss, and one had periorbital pain. The aneurysms were treated as follows: Group 1 received progressive ligation of the internal carotid artery in the neck with a Selverstone clamp and a surface superficial temporal artery-middle cerebral artery (STA-MCA) anastomosis (purely intracavernous in nine, and with subarachnoid extension in one); Group 2 underwent trapping of the internal carotid artery and a deep STA-MCA anastomosis (purely intracavernous in seven); and Group 3 had direct clipping of the aneurysm (purely intracavernous in five, and with subarachnoid extension in 10). The cavernous sinus was entered directly through its roof by a pterional craniotomy with radical removal of the optic canal, lesser sphenoid wing, and lateral and superior orbital walls. Proximal control of the internal carotid artery was obtained through a cervical incision. Two patients in Group 1 developed transient neurological deficits, which resolved. Two patients in Group 2 developed a cerebral infarction, one of whom died; in both of these patients, the anastomosis was completed after the internal carotid artery occlusion. Two patients in Group 3 progressed from marked visual loss to blindness of the same side, and one developed an intraventricular hemorrhage during induction of anesthesia and died without surgery. It is proposed that a direct approach to symptomatic aneurysms in the cavernous sinus is the best initial alternative. When this approach is not feasible, a trapping procedure preceded by a high-flow extracranial-intracranial anastomosis may be considered. Although the authors have been able to clip aneurysms of various sizes, this has not been possible in all patients. Further work is needed in this area.
对海绵窦内动脉瘤进行直接手术是一项极具挑战性的技术操作。海绵窦内颈内动脉与静脉结构及颅神经的紧密关系,使得手术入路极为困难。356例动脉瘤患者中有32例出现源于海绵窦内颈内动脉的有症状动脉瘤。21例患者的动脉瘤完全位于海绵窦内,另外11例患者的动脉瘤起源于海绵窦并延伸至蛛网膜下腔。在纯粹位于海绵窦内的动脉瘤中,有5个小动脉瘤(直径小于25mm)和16个巨大动脉瘤(直径大于或等于25mm)。15例纯粹海绵窦内病变的患者出现眶上裂综合征,6例有其他各种症状。在11例有蛛网膜下腔延伸的患者中,5例发生蛛网膜下腔出血(Ⅰ级或Ⅱ级),5例出现同侧视力丧失,1例有眶周疼痛。动脉瘤的治疗方法如下:第1组采用塞尔弗斯通夹逐步结扎颈部颈内动脉,并进行颞浅动脉-大脑中动脉(STA-MCA)表面吻合术(9例纯粹位于海绵窦内,1例有蛛网膜下腔延伸);第2组进行颈内动脉夹闭并进行深部STA-MCA吻合术(7例纯粹位于海绵窦内);第3组直接夹闭动脉瘤(5例纯粹位于海绵窦内,10例有蛛网膜下腔延伸)。通过翼点开颅术直接经海绵窦顶部进入,彻底切除视神经管、蝶骨小翼以及眶外侧壁和眶上壁。通过颈部切口实现颈内动脉近端控制。第1组有2例患者出现短暂性神经功能缺损,但后来恢复。第2组有2例患者发生脑梗死,其中1例死亡;在这2例患者中,颈内动脉闭塞后完成了吻合术。第3组有2例患者从明显视力丧失发展为同侧失明,1例在麻醉诱导期间发生脑室内出血,未进行手术即死亡。有人提出,对海绵窦内有症状的动脉瘤采用直接手术方法是最佳的初始选择。当这种方法不可行时,可以考虑在进行高流量颅外-颅内吻合术之后进行夹闭手术。尽管作者能够夹闭各种大小的动脉瘤,但并非所有患者都能做到。该领域还需要进一步开展工作。