Crotty T B, Li C Y, Edwards W D, Suman V J
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology and the Section of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A.
Cardiovasc Pathol. 1995 Jan-Mar;4(1):39-42. doi: 10.1016/1054-8807(94)00023-k.
The heart is subject to involvement by primary (AL), senile (AS), and familial (AF) forms of amyloidosis, but the frequency, severity, and therapy of amyloid-related cardiac symptoms differ depending on the type of amyloidosis present. Endomycardial biopsy is a safe and reliable procedure for diagnosing cardiac amyloidosis, and immunohistochemical staining of routinely processed biopsy specimens can be performed to classify the type of amyloid present. However, whether or not the type can be determined from the histologic extent and pattern of amyloid deposition is unclear. Endomyocardial biopsy specimens from 100 patients with cardiac amyloidosis (74 AL, 22 AS, 4 AF) were examined, and the histologic extent and pattern of amyloid deposition were correlated with the amyloid immunophenotype. No difference in the extent of amyloid deposition was identified among the three types. Interstitial nodules of amyloid were more common in AS (82%) than in AL (50%, p = 0.0129), whereas vascular involvement was more frequently observed in AL (88%) than in AS (26%, p < 0.0001). Endocardial and interstitial pericellular deposition occurred with similar frequencies in both groups. Although statistically significant differences existed in the patterns of amyloid deposition, they did not allow reliable distinction between the different types in individual cases. Consequently, in older patients without serum or urinary light chains, immunohistochemical staining is recommended to distinguish AL from AS types of amyloid in cardiac biopsy tissues.
心脏易受原发性(AL)、老年性(AS)和家族性(AF)淀粉样变性的累及,但淀粉样变性相关心脏症状的发生率、严重程度及治疗方法因现存淀粉样变性的类型而异。心内膜活检是诊断心脏淀粉样变性的一种安全可靠的方法,可对常规处理的活检标本进行免疫组织化学染色以对存在的淀粉样蛋白类型进行分类。然而,是否能根据淀粉样蛋白沉积的组织学范围和模式来确定类型尚不清楚。对100例心脏淀粉样变性患者(74例AL型、22例AS型、4例AF型)的心内膜活检标本进行了检查,并将淀粉样蛋白沉积的组织学范围和模式与淀粉样蛋白免疫表型进行关联分析。三种类型之间在淀粉样蛋白沉积范围上未发现差异。淀粉样蛋白的间质结节在AS型中(82%)比在AL型中(50%,p = 0.0129)更常见,而血管受累在AL型中(88%)比在AS型中(26%,p < 0.0001)更频繁地被观察到。两组内心内膜和间质细胞周围沉积的发生率相似。尽管淀粉样蛋白沉积模式存在统计学上的显著差异,但在个别病例中它们并不能可靠地区分不同类型。因此,对于无血清或尿轻链的老年患者,建议在心脏活检组织中进行免疫组织化学染色以区分AL型和AS型淀粉样变性。