Suppr超能文献

如何评估葡萄糖钳夹术的质量?使用新型自动钳夹装置ClampArt进行钳夹术的评估

How to Assess the Quality of Glucose Clamps? Evaluation of Clamps Performed With ClampArt, a Novel Automated Clamp Device.

作者信息

Benesch Carsten, Heise Tim, Klein Oliver, Heinemann Lutz, Arnolds Sabine

机构信息

Profil, Neuss, Germany.

Profil, Neuss, Germany

出版信息

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Jul;9(4):792-800. doi: 10.1177/1932296815576957. Epub 2015 Apr 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are no widely accepted parameters to assess the quality of glucose clamps. Thus, we selected different parameters describing clamp quality. These parameters were then evaluated in glucose clamps carried out with ClampArt, a novel CE-marked, state-of-the-art fully automated glucose clamp device employing continuous blood glucose (BG) measurements and minute-by-minute adaptations of glucose infusion rate (GIR).

METHODS

Thirty-nine glucose clamps were performed in 10 healthy and 29 subjects with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) (total duration 583 h). ClampArt-based BG measurements were compared with those obtained with a laboratory reference method. Clamp quality was assessed by 5 parameters: (1) difference (mg/dl) of all paired BG measurements of ClampArt versus reference method ("trueness"), (2) coefficient of variation (CV, %) of ClampArt's BG measurements at target clamp level ("precision"), (3) mean absolute relative difference (MARD, %) at target clamp level ("accuracy"), (4) difference (mg/dl) between ClampArt and target BG ("control deviation"), and (5) percentage operational time ("utility").

RESULTS

ClampArt-based BG measurements showed a trueness of 1.2 ± 2.5 mg/dl. CV and MARD at target BG were 5.5 ± 2.1% and 5.3 ± 2.3%, respectively. There were only small deviations from target level (1.2 ± 1.6 mg/dl). Operational time was as high as 95.4% ± 4.1% (means ± SD).

CONCLUSIONS

The selected parameters seem to be adequate to characterize clamp quality. The novel, fully automated clamp device ClampArt achieves high clamp quality, which in future trials should be compared with other (automated and manual) clamp methods.

摘要

背景

目前尚无被广泛接受的评估葡萄糖钳夹质量的参数。因此,我们选择了不同的参数来描述钳夹质量。随后,在使用ClampArt进行的葡萄糖钳夹实验中对这些参数进行了评估。ClampArt是一种新型的、有CE标志的、采用连续血糖(BG)测量和逐分钟调整葡萄糖输注速率(GIR)的先进全自动葡萄糖钳夹装置。

方法

对10名健康受试者和29名1型糖尿病(T1DM)患者进行了39次葡萄糖钳夹实验(总时长583小时)。将基于ClampArt的BG测量结果与通过实验室参考方法获得的结果进行比较。通过5个参数评估钳夹质量:(1)ClampArt与参考方法的所有配对BG测量值的差值(mg/dl)(“准确性”),(2)目标钳夹水平下ClampArt的BG测量值的变异系数(CV,%)(“精密度”),(3)目标钳夹水平下的平均绝对相对差值(MARD,%)(“准确度”),(4)ClampArt与目标BG之间的差值(mg/dl)(“控制偏差”),以及(5)操作时间百分比(“实用性”)。

结果

基于ClampArt的BG测量显示准确性为1.2±2.5 mg/dl。目标BG水平下的CV和MARD分别为5.5±2.1%和5.3±2.3%。与目标水平的偏差很小(1.2±1.6 mg/dl)。操作时间高达95.4%±4.1%(均值±标准差)。

结论

所选参数似乎足以表征钳夹质量。新型全自动钳夹装置ClampArt具有较高的钳夹质量,在未来的试验中应与其他(自动和手动)钳夹方法进行比较。

相似文献

1
How to Assess the Quality of Glucose Clamps? Evaluation of Clamps Performed With ClampArt, a Novel Automated Clamp Device.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Jul;9(4):792-800. doi: 10.1177/1932296815576957. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
2
Improved Algorithm for Automated Glucose Clamps.
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017 Feb;19(2):124-130. doi: 10.1089/dia.2016.0355. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
3
Considering Blood Dilution improves the Precision of Continuous Whole Blood Glucose Measurements.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2019 Jul;13(4):751-755. doi: 10.1177/1932296818803621. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
4
New Clamp-PID Algorithm for Automated Glucose Clamps Improves Clamp Quality.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022 Mar;16(2):408-414. doi: 10.1177/1932296821991514. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
5
A Comprehensive Performance Evaluation of Five Blood Glucose Systems in the Hypo-, Eu-, and Hyperglycemic Range.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2016 Nov 1;10(6):1316-1323. doi: 10.1177/1932296816668373. Print 2016 Nov.
6
Multicenter Observational Study of the First-Generation Intravenous Blood Glucose Monitoring System in Hospitalized Patients.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Jul;9(4):739-50. doi: 10.1177/1932296815587939. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
7
Rate-of-Change Dependence of the Performance of Two CGM Systems During Induced Glucose Swings.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Jul;9(4):801-7. doi: 10.1177/1932296815578716. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
9
System accuracy evaluation of 27 blood glucose monitoring systems according to DIN EN ISO 15197.
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2010 Mar;12(3):221-31. doi: 10.1089/dia.2009.0128.

引用本文的文献

3

本文引用的文献

1
A comparative effectiveness analysis of three continuous glucose monitors: the Navigator, G4 Platinum, and Enlite.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014 Jul;8(4):699-708. doi: 10.1177/1932296814532203. Epub 2014 Apr 21.
3
Insulin aspart has a shorter duration of action than human insulin over a wide dose-range.
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013 Jan;15(1):77-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2012.01677.x. Epub 2012 Sep 9.
4
Blood glucose control using an artificial pancreas reduces the workload of ICU nurses.
J Artif Organs. 2012 Mar;15(1):71-6. doi: 10.1007/s10047-011-0611-7. Epub 2011 Sep 27.
5
Insulin glulisine has a faster onset of action compared with insulin aspart in healthy volunteers.
Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2010 Oct;118(9):662-4. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1252067. Epub 2010 Apr 28.
6
Oral insulin: a comparison with subcutaneous regular human insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Diabetes Care. 2010 Jun;33(6):1288-90. doi: 10.2337/dc09-1807. Epub 2010 Feb 25.
7
Intraoperative glycemic control procedures and the use of an artificial pancreas.
World J Gastroenterol. 2009 Sep 7;15(33):4126-31. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.4126.
8
PROMAXX inhaled insulin: safe and efficacious administration with a commercially available dry powder inhaler.
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2009 May;11(5):455-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2008.00961.x. Epub 2009 Feb 19.
10
The interpretation of glucose clamp studies of long-acting insulin analogues: from physiology to marketing and back.
Diabetologia. 2008 Oct;51(10):1790-5. doi: 10.1007/s00125-008-1098-5. Epub 2008 Aug 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验