Shneerson Catherine L, Gale Nicola K
University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Qual Health Res. 2015 Jun;25(6):845-56. doi: 10.1177/1049732315580107. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
The need for mixed methods research in answering health care questions is becoming increasingly recognized because of the complexity of factors that affect health outcomes. In this article, we argue for the value of using a qualitatively driven mixed method approach for identifying and answering clinically relevant research questions. This argument is illustrated by findings from a study on the self-management practices of cancer survivors and the exploration of one particular clinically relevant finding about higher uptake of self-management in cancer survivors who had received chemotherapy treatment compared with those who have not. A cross-sectional study generated findings that formed the basis for the qualitative study, by informing the purposive sampling strategy and generating new qualitative research questions. Using a quantitative research component to supplement a qualitative study can enhance the generalizability and clinical relevance of the findings and produce detailed, contextualized, and rich answers to research questions that would be unachievable through quantitative or qualitative methods alone.
由于影响健康结果的因素复杂,混合方法研究在回答医疗保健问题方面的必要性日益得到认可。在本文中,我们主张采用定性驱动的混合方法来识别和回答临床相关研究问题的价值。一项关于癌症幸存者自我管理实践的研究结果以及对一个特定临床相关发现的探索说明了这一观点,该发现是与未接受化疗的癌症幸存者相比,接受化疗的癌症幸存者自我管理的接受度更高。一项横断面研究产生的结果为定性研究奠定了基础,为目的抽样策略提供了信息并产生了新的定性研究问题。使用定量研究部分来补充定性研究可以提高研究结果的普遍性和临床相关性,并为仅通过定量或定性方法无法实现的研究问题提供详细、情境化且丰富的答案。