• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版分离性亚型的潜在类别分析和主轴因子分析

Latent profile analysis and principal axis factoring of the DSM-5 dissociative subtype.

作者信息

Frewen Paul A, Brown Matthew F D, Steuwe Carolin, Lanius Ruth A

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Psychology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2015 Apr 1;6:26406. doi: 10.3402/ejpt.v6.26406. eCollection 2015.

DOI:10.3402/ejpt.v6.26406
PMID:25854673
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4390557/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

A dissociative subtype has been recognized based on the presence of experiences of depersonalization and derealization in relation to DSM-IV posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). However, the dissociative subtype has not been assessed in a community sample in relation to the revised DSM-5 PTSD criteria. Moreover, the 20-item PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) currently does not assess depersonalization and derealization.

METHOD

We therefore evaluated two items for assessing depersonalization and derealization in 557 participants recruited online who endorsed PTSD symptoms of at least moderate severity on the PCL-5.

RESULTS

A five-class solution identified two PTSD classes who endorsed dissociative experiences associated with either 1) severe or 2) moderate PTSD symptom severity (D-PTSD classes). Those in the severe dissociative class were particularly likely to endorse histories of childhood physical and sexual abuse. A principal axis factor analysis of the symptom list identified six latent variables: 1) Reexperiencing, 2) Emotional Numbing/Anhedonia, 3) Dissociation, 4) Negative Alterations in Cognition & Mood, 5) Avoidance, and 6) Hyperarousal.

CONCLUSIONS

The present results further support the presence of a dissociative subtype within the DSM-5 criteria for PTSD.

摘要

目的

基于与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)相关的人格解体和现实解体体验,已识别出一种分离亚型。然而,尚未在社区样本中根据修订后的DSM-5 PTSD标准对分离亚型进行评估。此外,目前的20项DSM-5 PTSD检查表(PCL-5)未评估人格解体和现实解体。

方法

因此,我们在557名通过网络招募的参与者中评估了两项用于评估人格解体和现实解体的条目,这些参与者在PCL-5上认可至少中度严重程度的PTSD症状。

结果

一个五类解决方案识别出两类PTSD患者,他们认可与1)严重或2)中度PTSD症状严重程度相关的分离体验(D-PTSD类别)。严重分离类别的患者特别可能认可童年期身体和性虐待史。对症状列表进行的主轴因子分析确定了六个潜在变量:1)重新体验,2)情感麻木/快感缺失,3)分离,4)认知与情绪的消极改变,5)回避,以及6)过度警觉。

结论

目前的结果进一步支持在DSM-5 PTSD标准中存在分离亚型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44fa/4390557/0b5982c52ac0/EJPT-6-26406-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44fa/4390557/0b5982c52ac0/EJPT-6-26406-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44fa/4390557/0b5982c52ac0/EJPT-6-26406-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Latent profile analysis and principal axis factoring of the DSM-5 dissociative subtype.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版分离性亚型的潜在类别分析和主轴因子分析
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2015 Apr 1;6:26406. doi: 10.3402/ejpt.v6.26406. eCollection 2015.
2
The dissociative subtype of PTSD in women with substance use disorders: Exploring symptom and exposure profiles.物质使用障碍女性创伤后应激障碍的分离亚型:探索症状和暴露特征。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2019 Apr;99:73-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2019.01.004. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
3
The Dissociative Subtype of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Among Adolescents: Co-Occurring PTSD, Depersonalization/Derealization, and Other Dissociation Symptoms.青少年创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的解离亚型:共病的PTSD、人格解体/现实解体及其他解离症状
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017 Dec;56(12):1062-1072. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2017.09.425. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
4
Evidence for a dissociative subtype of PTSD by latent profile and confirmatory factor analyses in a civilian sample.在一个平民样本中,通过潜在剖面分析和验证性因子分析为 PTSD 的分离亚型提供证据。
Depress Anxiety. 2012 Aug;29(8):689-700. doi: 10.1002/da.21944. Epub 2012 May 11.
5
A latent class analysis of dissociation and posttraumatic stress disorder: evidence for a dissociative subtype.分离性障碍与创伤后应激障碍的潜在类别分析:一种分离性亚型的证据
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012 Jul;69(7):698-705. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.1574.
6
Childhood maltreatment type and severity predict depersonalization and derealization in treatment-seeking women with posttraumatic stress disorder.童年期虐待类型和严重程度可预测创伤后应激障碍治疗寻求女性的人格解体和现实解体。
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Oct;292:113301. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113301. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
7
The dissociative subtype of PTSD in trauma-exposed individuals: a latent class analysis and examination of clinical covariates.创伤暴露个体创伤后应激障碍的分离亚型:潜在类别分析及临床协变量的考察。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2022 Mar 3;13(1):2031591. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2022.2031591. eCollection 2022.
8
Psychometric Properties of the Dissociative Subtype of PTSD Scale: Replication and Extension in a Clinical Sample of Trauma-Exposed Veterans.创伤后应激障碍解离分量表的心理计量学特性:在创伤暴露退伍军人的临床样本中的复制与扩展。
Behav Ther. 2019 Sep;50(5):952-966. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2019.02.003. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
9
Dissociation and posttraumatic stress disorder: a latent profile analysis.分离与创伤后应激障碍:一项潜在剖面分析
J Trauma Stress. 2014 Aug;27(4):388-96. doi: 10.1002/jts.21933. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
10
The Dissociative Subtype of PTSD Interview (DSP-I): Development and Psychometric Properties.创伤后应激障碍的分离亚型访谈(DSP-I):发展与心理测量特性。
J Trauma Dissociation. 2019 Oct-Dec;20(5):564-581. doi: 10.1080/15299732.2019.1597806. Epub 2019 May 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Emotional Disorders, Risk Factors, and Correlations of Post-Partum Depression and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder with Sexual Function During Post-Partum Period.产后情绪障碍、危险因素以及产后抑郁症和创伤后应激障碍与产后性功能的相关性
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Apr 22;15(9):1065. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15091065.
2
Resolution of Dissociated Ego States Relieves Flashback-Related Symptoms in Combat-Related PTSD: A Brief Mindfulness Based Intervention.解离自我状态的解决可缓解与战斗相关的创伤后应激障碍中与闪回相关的症状:一种基于正念的简短干预措施。
Mil Psychol. 2020 Feb 21;32(2):135-148. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2019.1654292. eCollection 2020.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in US combat soldiers: a head-to-head comparison of DSM-5 versus DSM-IV-TR symptom criteria with the PTSD checklist.美国作战士兵创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的患病率:使用创伤后应激障碍检查表对DSM-5与DSM-IV-TR症状标准进行的直接比较。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2014 Sep;1(4):269-77. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(14)70235-4. Epub 2014 Aug 14.
2
ICD-11 Complex PTSD in US National and Veteran Samples: Prevalence and Structural Associations with PTSD.美国国家和退伍军人样本中的国际疾病分类第11版复杂性创伤后应激障碍:患病率及与创伤后应激障碍的结构关联
Clin Psychol Sci. 2015 Mar;3(2):215-229. doi: 10.1177/2167702614545480.
3
Development and validation of the Convalescence Symptom Assessment Scale for EsophageCtomy patients.
食管癌术后恢复期症状评估量表的研制与验证。
Nurs Open. 2024 Feb;11(2):e2085. doi: 10.1002/nop2.2085.
4
Building resilience through daily smartphone app use: results of a pilot study of the JoyPop app with social work students.通过每日使用智能手机应用程序增强心理韧性:针对社会工作专业学生开展的JoyPop应用程序试点研究结果
Front Digit Health. 2023 Nov 20;5:1265120. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1265120. eCollection 2023.
5
Neurobiological and genetic correlates of the dissociative subtype of posttraumatic stress disorder.创伤后应激障碍解离亚型的神经生物学和遗传学相关性。
J Psychopathol Clin Sci. 2023 May;132(4):409-427. doi: 10.1037/abn0000795. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
6
Cannabis-assisted psychotherapy for complex dissociative posttraumatic stress disorder: A case report.大麻辅助心理治疗复杂解离性创伤后应激障碍:一例报告。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Feb 9;14:1051542. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1051542. eCollection 2023.
7
Amnesia of Uncertain Etiology in an Adolescent during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Report.新冠疫情期间一名青少年病因不明的失忆症:病例报告
Case Rep Neurol. 2022 May 3;14(2):223-230. doi: 10.1159/000523733. eCollection 2022 May-Aug.
8
The dissociative subtype of PTSD in trauma-exposed individuals: a latent class analysis and examination of clinical covariates.创伤暴露个体创伤后应激障碍的分离亚型:潜在类别分析及临床协变量的考察。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2022 Mar 3;13(1):2031591. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2022.2031591. eCollection 2022.
9
Global Psychotrauma Screen (GPS): psychometric properties in two Internet-based studies.全球心理创伤筛查(GPS):两项基于互联网的研究中的心理测量学特性。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021 Jun 25;12(1):1881725. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2021.1881725. eCollection 2021.
10
Psychometric properties of the Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) in Greek women after cesarean section.希腊剖宫产术后女性使用 DSM-5 创伤后应激障碍检查表(PCL-5)的心理计量特性。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 13;16(8):e0255689. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255689. eCollection 2021.
Dimensional structure of DSM-5 posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms: results from the National Health and Resilience in Veterans Study.
DSM-5 创伤后应激障碍症状的维度结构:来自国家健康和退伍军人适应力研究的结果。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2015 May;76(5):546-53. doi: 10.4088/JCP.14m09091.
4
Dimensional structure of DSM-5 posttraumatic stress symptoms: support for a hybrid Anhedonia and Externalizing Behaviors model.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版创伤后应激症状的维度结构:对快感缺失与外化行为混合模型的支持
J Psychiatr Res. 2015 Feb;61:106-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.10.012. Epub 2014 Nov 22.
5
DSM-5 posttraumatic stress disorder: factor structure and rates of diagnosis.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版创伤后应激障碍:因子结构与诊断率
J Psychiatr Res. 2014 Dec;59:60-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.08.014. Epub 2014 Aug 30.
6
Dissociation and posttraumatic stress disorder: a latent profile analysis.分离与创伤后应激障碍:一项潜在剖面分析
J Trauma Stress. 2014 Aug;27(4):388-96. doi: 10.1002/jts.21933. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
7
The underlying dimensions of DSM-5 posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in an epidemiological sample of Chinese earthquake survivors.DSM-5 创伤后应激障碍症状在地震幸存者流行病学样本中的潜在维度。
J Anxiety Disord. 2014 May;28(4):345-51. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2014.03.008. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
8
A genome-wide association study of clinical symptoms of dissociation in a trauma-exposed sample.一项针对受过创伤样本中分离性临床症状的全基因组关联研究。
Depress Anxiety. 2014 Apr;31(4):352-60. doi: 10.1002/da.22260. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
9
Trauma-related altered states of consciousness: exploring the 4-D model.创伤相关的意识改变状态:探索四维模型。
J Trauma Dissociation. 2014;15(4):436-56. doi: 10.1080/15299732.2013.873377.
10
The co-occurrence of PTSD and dissociation: differentiating severe PTSD from dissociative-PTSD.创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)与分离症状的共现:区分重度PTSD与分离性PTSD。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2014 Aug;49(8):1297-306. doi: 10.1007/s00127-014-0819-y. Epub 2014 Jan 21.