• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“除非事关生死”:对口吃成年人医疗保健经历的定性研究

"Not Unless It's a Life or Death Thing": A Qualitative Study of the Health Care Experiences of Adults Who Stutter.

作者信息

Perez Hector R, Doig-Acuña Camilo, Starrels Joanna L

机构信息

Primary Care Research Fellow, New York University School of Medicine, 227 East 30th Street, 6th Floor, New York, NY, 10016, USA.

New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Nov;30(11):1639-44. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3302-x. Epub 2015 Apr 9.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-015-3302-x
PMID:25855480
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4617916/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

For adults who stutter, communication difficulties can impact many spheres of life. Previous studies have not examined how stuttering might impact patient's experiences with the medical system.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to understand the range and depth of experiences with the medical system among adults who stutter.

DESIGN

This was a qualitative study using age-stratified focus groups.

PARTICIPANTS

Sixteen adults who stutter were recruited at a national conference about stuttering.

APPROACH

We conducted three focus groups. Participants also completed a written questionnaire about sociodemographic characteristics, health status, and the impact of stuttering on their life [using the St. Louis Inventory of Life Perspectives Scale (SL-ILP-S) Total Effect Score]. We analyzed data using an iterative, thematic analysis, with an inductive approach, at a semantic level.

KEY RESULTS

Participants were mostly (75 %) male and resided throughout the United States. The mean SL-ILP-S Total Effect Score was 27.3, indicating that stuttering caused minimal concern in participants' lives. Despite this, we identified five themes that characterize ways in which stuttering affects interactions with the medical system. Participants described (1) discomfort speaking with office staff and physicians, which resulted in (2) avoiding health care interactions because of stuttering, and (3) relying on a third party to navigate the medical system. During visits with physicians, participants felt that (4) discussing stuttering with physicians required trust and rapport, and (5) speaking assertively with physicians required self-acceptance of their stuttering.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified ways in which stuttering affects medical interactions. These results highlight the need for increased awareness and training for medical staff and physicians when caring for persons who stutter. Future studies among diverse samples of stutterers can determine the effects of stuttering on medical interactions, and inform the development of interventions to provide high quality health care for adults who stutter.

摘要

背景

对于口吃的成年人来说,沟通困难会影响生活的许多方面。以往的研究尚未探讨口吃如何影响患者在医疗系统中的就医体验。

目的

我们的目的是了解口吃成年人在医疗系统中的就医体验的范围和深度。

设计

这是一项使用年龄分层焦点小组的定性研究。

参与者

在一次全国口吃会议上招募了16名口吃成年人。

方法

我们进行了三个焦点小组讨论。参与者还完成了一份关于社会人口学特征、健康状况以及口吃对其生活影响的书面问卷[使用圣路易斯生活视角量表(SL-ILP-S)总效应得分]。我们采用迭代主题分析法,以归纳法在语义层面分析数据。

主要结果

参与者大多(75%)为男性,居住在美国各地。SL-ILP-S总效应得分的平均值为27.3,表明口吃在参与者生活中引起的担忧最小。尽管如此,我们确定了五个主题,这些主题描述了口吃影响与医疗系统互动的方式。参与者描述了(1)与办公室工作人员和医生交谈时感到不适,这导致(2)因口吃而避免医疗保健互动,以及(3)依靠第三方在医疗系统中周旋。在与医生就诊期间,参与者认为(4)与医生讨论口吃需要信任和融洽关系,并且(5)自信地与医生交谈需要自我接受口吃。

结论

我们确定了口吃影响医疗互动的方式。这些结果凸显了在照顾口吃患者时,医护人员和医生提高认识和接受培训的必要性。未来在不同口吃者样本中的研究可以确定口吃对医疗互动的影响,并为开发干预措施提供信息,以便为口吃成年人提供高质量的医疗保健。

相似文献

1
"Not Unless It's a Life or Death Thing": A Qualitative Study of the Health Care Experiences of Adults Who Stutter.“除非事关生死”:对口吃成年人医疗保健经历的定性研究
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Nov;30(11):1639-44. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3302-x. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
2
The impact of stuttering on adults who stutter and their partners.口吃对成年口吃者及其伴侣的影响。
J Fluency Disord. 2013 Mar;38(1):14-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2012.12.001. Epub 2012 Dec 13.
3
Capsule Commentary on Perez, Doig-Acuna, and Starrels, "Not Unless It's a Life or Death Thing": A Qualitative Study of the Health Care Experiences of Adults Who Stutter.佩雷斯、多伊格 - 阿库纳和斯塔雷尔斯所著《除非事关生死》的胶囊评论:对口吃成年人医疗保健经历的定性研究
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Nov;30(11):1696. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3434-z.
4
Older people who stutter: barriers to communication and perceptions of treatment needs.口吃老年人:沟通障碍和治疗需求认知。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2010 Jan-Feb;45(1):15-30. doi: 10.3109/13682820802627314.
5
Self-help conferences for people who stutter: a qualitative investigation.口吃者自助会议:一项定性研究。
J Fluency Disord. 2011 Dec;36(4):290-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2011.06.001. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
6
The Impact of Stuttering on Development of Self-Identity, Relationships, and Quality of Life in Women Who Stutter.口吃对女性自我认同、人际关系和生活质量的发展的影响。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018 Oct 19;27(3S):1244-1258. doi: 10.1044/2018_AJSLP-ODC11-17-0201.
7
Self-efficacy and quality of life in adults who stutter.口吃成年人的自我效能感与生活质量
J Fluency Disord. 2017 Dec;54:14-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2017.09.004. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
8
The accuracy with which adults who do not stutter predict stuttering-related communication attitudes.不口吃的成年人对口吃相关交流态度的预测准确性。
J Fluency Disord. 2011 Dec;36(4):334-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2011.06.002. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
9
Perceptions of university instructors toward students who stutter: a quantitative and qualitative approach.大学教师对口吃学生的看法:一种定量与定性相结合的方法。
J Commun Disord. 2011 Nov-Dec;44(6):631-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2011.07.002. Epub 2011 Aug 5.
10
Life experiences of people who stutter, and the perceived impact of stuttering on quality of life: personal accounts of South African individuals.口吃者的生活经历,以及口吃对生活质量的感知影响:南非个人的亲身叙述。
J Fluency Disord. 2004;29(4):275-305. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2004.10.001. Epub 2004 Dec 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Stakeholder Perspectives on the Responsible Innovation in Health Framework for Addressing Stigma-Based Health Inequalities Among People Who Stutter.利益相关者对解决口吃者基于耻辱感的健康不平等问题的健康领域负责任创新框架的看法。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Sep-Oct;60(5):e70115. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.70115.
2
Virtual reality exposure therapy for reducing social anxiety in stuttering: A randomized controlled pilot trial.虚拟现实暴露疗法减轻口吃患者社交焦虑:一项随机对照试验
Front Digit Health. 2023 Feb 9;5:1061323. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1061323. eCollection 2023.
3
Stuttering: Clinical and research update.口吃:临床与研究进展
Can Fam Physician. 2016 Jun;62(6):479-84.
4
Leading the Way in Health Disparities Research.引领健康差异研究之路。
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Nov;30(11):1569. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3498-9.
5
Capsule Commentary on Perez, Doig-Acuna, and Starrels, "Not Unless It's a Life or Death Thing": A Qualitative Study of the Health Care Experiences of Adults Who Stutter.佩雷斯、多伊格 - 阿库纳和斯塔雷尔斯所著《除非事关生死》的胶囊评论:对口吃成年人医疗保健经历的定性研究
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Nov;30(11):1696. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3434-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Social anxiety disorder and stuttering: current status and future directions.社交焦虑障碍与口吃:现状与未来方向
J Fluency Disord. 2014 Jun;40:69-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2013.08.003. Epub 2013 Sep 2.
2
Trait and social anxiety in adults with chronic stuttering: conclusions following meta-analysis.成人慢性口吃患者的特质焦虑和社交焦虑:荟萃分析后的结论
J Fluency Disord. 2014 Jun;40:35-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2014.01.001. Epub 2014 Jan 15.
3
Functional impairment and Internet use among older adults: implications for meaningful use of patient portals.老年人的功能障碍与互联网使用:对患者门户网站合理使用的启示
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Jul;174(7):1188-90. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.1864.
4
Global prevalence of vision impairment and blindness: magnitude and temporal trends, 1990-2010.全球视力障碍和失明的患病率:1990-2010 年的规模和时间趋势。
Ophthalmology. 2013 Dec;120(12):2377-2384. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.05.025. Epub 2013 Jul 10.
5
Epidemiology of stuttering: 21st century advances.口吃的流行病学:21 世纪的进展。
J Fluency Disord. 2013 Jun;38(2):66-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2012.11.002. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
6
Avoidance of eye gaze by adults who stutter.口吃成人回避眼神接触。
J Fluency Disord. 2012 Dec;37(4):263-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2012.04.004. Epub 2012 May 7.
7
Self-help conferences for people who stutter: a qualitative investigation.口吃者自助会议:一项定性研究。
J Fluency Disord. 2011 Dec;36(4):290-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2011.06.001. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
8
Quality of life in adults who stutter.口吃成年人的生活质量。
J Commun Disord. 2011 Jul-Aug;44(4):429-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2011.02.002. Epub 2011 Mar 27.
9
Mood and substance use disorders among adults seeking speech treatment for stuttering.成人寻求口吃言语治疗中的情绪和物质使用障碍。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2010 Oct;53(5):1178-90. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0166). Epub 2010 Jul 19.
10
Disability and the training of health professionals.残疾与卫生专业人员的培训
Lancet. 2009 Nov 28;374(9704):1815-6. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(09)62050-x.