1Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. 2Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anesthesiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 3Department of Medical Informatics, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Crit Care Med. 2015 Jul;43(7):1508-19. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000998.
Oxygen is vital during critical illness, but hyperoxia may harm patients. Our aim was to systematically evaluate the methodology and findings of cohort studies investigating the effects of hyperoxia in critically ill adults.
A meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis of cohort studies published between 2008 and 2015 was conducted. Electronic databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science were systematically searched for the keywords hyperoxia and mortality or outcome.
Publications assessing the effect of arterial hyperoxia on outcome in critically ill adults (≥ 18 yr) admitted to critical care units were eligible. We excluded studies in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, extracorporeal life support or hyperbaric oxygen therapy, and animal studies. Due to a lack of data, no studies dedicated to patients with acute lung injury, sepsis, shock, or multiple trauma could be included.
Studies were included independent of admission diagnosis and definition of hyperoxia. The primary outcome measure was in-hospital mortality, and results were stratified for relevant subgroups (cardiac arrest, traumatic brain injury, stroke, post-cardiac surgery, and any mechanical ventilation). The effects of arterial oxygenation on functional outcome, long-term mortality, and discharge variables were studied as secondary outcomes.
Twenty-four studies were included of which five studies were only for a subset of the analyses. Nineteen studies were pooled for meta-analyses and showed that arterial hyperoxia during admission increases hospital mortality: adjusted odds ratio, 1.21 (95% CI, 1.08-1.37) (p = 0.001). Functional outcome measures were diverse and generally showed a more favorable outcome for normoxia.
In various subsets of critically ill patients, arterial hyperoxia was associated with poor hospital outcome. Considering the substantial heterogeneity of included studies and the lack of a clinical definition, more evidence is needed to provide optimal oxygen targets to critical care physicians.
氧气在危重病中至关重要,但高氧可能对患者造成伤害。我们的目的是系统地评估 2008 年至 2015 年间发表的队列研究,以调查高氧对危重症成人的影响。
对发表于 2008 年至 2015 年间的队列研究进行了荟萃分析和荟萃回归分析。系统地检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Web of Science 电子数据库中的高氧和死亡率或结局的关键词。
评估危重症成人(≥18 岁)入住重症监护病房时动脉高氧对结局影响的出版物符合条件。我们排除了慢性阻塞性肺疾病、体外生命支持或高压氧治疗以及动物研究的患者。由于缺乏数据,无法纳入急性肺损伤、脓毒症、休克或多发伤患者的研究。
研究是独立于入院诊断和高氧定义进行的。主要观察指标为院内死亡率,并对相关亚组(心搏骤停、创伤性脑损伤、中风、心脏手术后和任何机械通气)进行分层。还研究了动脉氧合对功能结局、长期死亡率和出院变量的影响。
共纳入 24 项研究,其中 5 项研究仅用于部分分析。对 19 项研究进行了荟萃分析,结果表明,入院时动脉高氧增加了住院死亡率:调整后的优势比为 1.21(95%可信区间,1.08-1.37)(p = 0.001)。功能结局指标多种多样,通常表现为正常氧合的预后更好。
在各种危重症患者亚组中,动脉高氧与不良的住院结局相关。考虑到纳入研究的显著异质性以及缺乏临床定义,需要更多的证据为重症监护医生提供最佳的氧目标。