• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[舌癌的间质放射治疗——雅各布森-山本分级与预后的比较]

[Interstitial radiotherapy of carcinoma of the tongue-comparison between Jacobson-Yamamoto grading and prognosis].

作者信息

Jingu K, Miyoshi M, Arichi E, Ohmagari J, Wada S, Uehara S, Masumoto H, Hayabuchi T, Matsui M, Hirata H

机构信息

Dept. of Radiology, Faculty of Med., Kyushu Univ.

出版信息

Gan No Rinsho. 1989 Oct;35(13):1587-90.

PMID:2585730
Abstract

One hundred and one patients of less than seventy years old with T1, T2 and N0 carcinoma of the tongue were graded according to the Jacobson-Yamamoto's grading (1-4 D). All patients were also classified into two groups such as less than fifty years old group and fifty to seventy years old group. Patients with grade 3, 4 C and 4 D carcinoma had more metastases to the cervical lymph nodes than grade 1, 2. Patients with T2N0 carcinoma showed approximately same five year cervical lymph node metastases free survival rate. However, the five year survival rate of less than fifty years old group was significantly lower than that of fifty to seventy years old group. In T2N0, grade 3-4 D carcinoma cases, more dead cases were found in less than fifty years old group than in fifty to seventy years old group.

摘要

101例年龄小于70岁的舌T1、T2及N0期癌患者根据雅各布森 - 山本分级法(1 - 4 D级)进行分级。所有患者还被分为两组,即小于50岁组和50至70岁组。3级、4 C级和4 D级癌患者发生颈部淋巴结转移的情况比1级、2级患者更多。T2N0期癌患者的五年颈部淋巴结无转移生存率大致相同。然而,小于50岁组的五年生存率显著低于50至70岁组。在T2N0、3 - 4 D级癌病例中,小于50岁组的死亡病例比50至70岁组更多。

相似文献

1
[Interstitial radiotherapy of carcinoma of the tongue-comparison between Jacobson-Yamamoto grading and prognosis].[舌癌的间质放射治疗——雅各布森-山本分级与预后的比较]
Gan No Rinsho. 1989 Oct;35(13):1587-90.
2
[Clinical results of N0 tongue cancer treated with interstitial brachytherapy and management of occult cervical node metastases].[间质近距离放疗治疗N0期舌癌的临床结果及隐匿性颈淋巴结转移的处理]
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi. 1991 Jun 25;51(6):671-7.
3
Is glossectomy necessary for late nodal metastases without clinical local recurrence after initial brachytherapy for N0 tongue cancer? A retrospective experience in 111 patients who received salvage therapy for cervical failure.对于N0期舌癌初次近距离放疗后出现晚期淋巴结转移但无临床局部复发的患者,是否有必要进行舌切除术?111例接受挽救性治疗以解决颈部治疗失败问题患者的回顾性经验。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jan;36(1):3-6. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyi218. Epub 2006 Jan 17.
4
Exclusive low-dose-rate brachytherapy in 279 patients with T2N0 mobile tongue carcinoma.279例T2N0期可活动舌癌患者的单纯低剂量率近距离放射治疗
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Oct 1;63(2):434-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.02.014.
5
[Mobile tongue cancer. Prognostic value of lymph node invasiveness. Apropos of 744 cases].[移动性舌癌。淋巴结侵袭的预后价值。基于744例病例]
Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac. 1989;106(8):551-5.
6
Elective neck irradiation on ipsilateral side in patients with early tongue cancer for high-risk group with late cervical lymph node metastasis.
Nagoya J Med Sci. 2006 Jan;68(1-2):53-62.
7
[Squamous-cell carcinoma of the tongue: treatment results and prognosis].[舌鳞状细胞癌:治疗结果与预后]
Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac. 2003 Feb;104(1):10-7.
8
[Relevant factors and management for patients with squamous carcinoma in tongue without clinical cervical lymphatic node metastasis].[舌鳞状细胞癌无临床颈淋巴结转移患者的相关因素及管理]
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2003 Jan;38(1):5-8.
9
[Prognostic factors in epidermoid carcinoma of the mobile tongue classified as T1-T2].[舌活动部T1-T2期表皮样癌的预后因素]
Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac. 2001 Oct;118(5):315-22.
10
[Multivariate analysis for prognostic predictors in the cN0 squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue].[舌部cN0期鳞状细胞癌预后预测指标的多因素分析]
Ai Zheng. 2003 Feb;22(2):206-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Extracellular Vesicles and Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Opportunities and Challenges.细胞外囊泡与肝细胞癌:机遇与挑战
Front Oncol. 2022 May 25;12:884369. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.884369. eCollection 2022.